this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
120 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19098 readers
3504 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Elon Musk, having endorsed and campaigned for Donald Trump, is now acting as a “shadow president,” advising on policies and personnel, and joining Trump on calls with world leaders.

This unprecedented relationship between the world’s richest man and the leader of the free world raises concerns about the influence of wealth on government.

While both Trump and Musk have incentives to continue their partnership, their volatile personalities and differing expertise may lead to a breakup in the future.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 59 minutes ago (1 children)

This is the most mask-off corporatist government we've ever seen, and they haven't even been sworn in yet.

[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 2 points 20 minutes ago

This is what happens when you pussyfoot consequences.

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world 3 points 43 minutes ago

The constant talk of Musk's power in the new administration must irritate the fuck out of Trump. How terrible.

[–] ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world 27 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

"Differing expertise?" They're both experts at destroying profitable businesses, and..? Narcissism? Hatred?

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 2 points 30 minutes ago

Musk hasn’t made a reality show yet, and Trump hasn’t become rich, despite multiple attempts. Maybe that’s the expertise they’re talking about?

"Leader of the free world" 🤡

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 31 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

"leader of the free world"

Coming from someone outside the USA: lulz, you guys don't know shit about freedom

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 38 points 3 hours ago

First Lady Elon Musk.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Ya know itd be a real fucken shame if this Saxon African bastard came down with a case of the dead.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago

"No one’s even bothering to try to kill Elmo."

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 11 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

This unprecedented relationship between the world’s richest man and the leader of the free world raises concerns about the influence of wealth on government.

The only change is that Liberals are apparently becoming aware of the power dynamic that has always existed — that democracy cannot exist with massive wealthy inequality and money equal to speech. I'm also positive that if Trump/MAGA fails to implement fascism (this time around), Liberals will believe the current system works, and completely ignore the reality that their system was almost destroyed by a small number of wealthy sociopaths.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah it's a bullshit take. There's always been a bunch of money up every presidents ass. It's just public. Very very public now.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago

You'd think they'd get the memo after several decades of "corporations get most of what they want, without objection" while "the people can't even get basic healthcare or a minimum wage comparable to poorer countries", yet here we are... Fascism is knocking down the door, financed by the wealthiest capitalism can muster, and they still have their heads firmly planted in the dirt, blaming the left for not voting, without evidence ... when the millions of people who didn't vote may very well be just as oblivious as Trump voters, don't know how the government works, don't know the danger they're in, and don't pay enough attention to care 99% of the time.

[–] GreatBlueHeron@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I'd be curious to know what the people downvoting this don't agree with?

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 1 points 47 minutes ago

For one thing, the Netherlands has nearly the lowest wealth inequality in the world, yet it is a democracy.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

And feed the rest to the pigs.