this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
167 points (100.0% liked)

3DPrinting

15790 readers
20 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is a battery cell case that was a pain last time I printed it with supports

Model: https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:5240533/files

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Ohh nice, battery pez dispenser!

Is that considered a raft + supports or just supports on there?

[–] petey@aussie.zone 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just supports, I had to manually paint them in to prevent the slicer from putting them all the way up the side

[–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

In Orca slicer, if you use tree supports and hybrid, an option appears (advanced must be enabled) for something like "Essential supports only". It is so much better than spending all that time adding or blocking supports.

[–] petey@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago

Ooh thanks I’ll give that a try

[–] anguo@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Would that be equivalent to PrusaSlicer's "automatic painting"?

[–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I have no clue about that. I only recently stumbled across the orca setting while waging my own battle against excessively aggressive supports.

[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Looks like the model is just resting on supports. Might have a roof or "support interface" (a layer between supports and model)

[–] IncogCyberspaceUser@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As a total beginner, it's not really clear to me what's meant here. I read printing some things are better to print at an angle, like boxes, for additional strength. Is that what's meant here?

[–] peregrin5@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think OP is putting it at an angle so there are no 90 degree overhangs and so the model doesn't need support added or removed.

[–] OmanMkII@aussie.zone 7 points 1 week ago

That's actually genius, thanks for the tip man

[–] mst@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

What exactly is the difference to just printing it standing?

[–] spitfire@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's one, but if you are priting a particularly delicate part, printing at an angle could strengthen the part significantly

[–] derek@infosec.pub 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

How? What mechanisms, conditions, etc, are we manipulating which produce such a significant effect? After a bit of searching I found this write up:

https://thor3d.ca/wp/the-effects-of-print-orientation-on-strength/

Is this what we're referring to? To summarize (if I've understood this properly): Printing at 45 degrees ensures none of the print's three axes are aligned with the printer's least accurate axis of movement.

[–] antimongo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Similar, but I believe the strength addition is also because it changes the directions of the Z-axis layers.

Most filament is rather strong in tension. If you imagine printing a regular cube, without rotation, it’s going to be strongest stretching or compressing the sides of the cube.

But if you pulled the cube apart from its top and bottom, the only adhesive strength is the fused connection between layer heights. Which is super weak.

By printing at an angle, the layer heights may be in a direction that doesn’t receive tensile load, making it functionally stronger.

[–] petey@aussie.zone 5 points 1 week ago

This model is almost entirely overhangs with small gaps between them, making support removal a pain. This way uses less filament and makes for better quality

[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

This particular model would have lots of troublesome bridging if printed vertically, and would need supports along the entire length if printed horizontally.

[–] KryptonNerd@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago

That's so smart! Thanks for the tip

[–] Gumbyyy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Caveat: I know nothing about 3D printing.

That being said, couldn't you just print it on its side?

[–] Zangoose@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It really depends on what you're printing, how strong you need it to be, and/or what axis you don't mind looking uglier because of layer lines.

In this case OP might have been able to print it on a side with minimal supports, but the idea is that printing it at an angle turns things that would have been overhangs (which are hard for printers to do because of the melted plastic sagging) into upwards slopes. The alternative is adding support material that is intended to snap off (i.e. The block at the bottom of this picture), but those would be hard/impossible to remove in models like OP's that would have supports inside the holes.

[–] petey@aussie.zone 1 points 1 week ago

That’s a great idea and would require similar amounts of support, however there’s still going to be 90 degree overhangs that wouldn’t come out quite as nice as the orientation I used

The model in question only has 1 flat side, its end (which is the top in the photo). Every other side requires supports if it’s on the build plate because of the recess in the cap, and the cap being wider than the rest of the model