this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
232 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

58143 readers
5570 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 39 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I used to love Google, the company, the search, the tech. But god damn if in the last 5 years it hasn’t become the most insane ad delivery tool in existence. Sometimes when I Google something it’s multiple full pages of ads before I actually see what I’m looking for. I switched to duckduckgo.

[–] Steve 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Should look into Kagi. No ads at all, for $5/month

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't think that's a good idea in terms of privacy and reliability. You need an account to use it

[–] Steve 1 points 11 months ago

In terms of privacy that could be debatable.
But what do you mean by reliability?

[–] Tygr@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

DDG is essentially Bing though. The results aren’t the greatest. If Bing decides to ban a site, it’s banned on DDG.

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Try presearch: it has way better results than DDG

[–] AProfessional@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Seems like a Brave-esqe crypto platform:

In addition to offering users a great search experience, Presearch is dedicated to creating significant value for marketers who would like to reach Presearch users. Advertisers can stake their PRE to a keyword, and whichever advertiser stakes the most tokens will have its ads displayed when a user searches on the term selected. Advertisers confer the most external value on PRE, so their success is very important to the ecosystem.

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

True, for the browser. But their search engine works in any browser and has the best quality search results

[–] AProfessional@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

The site has ads too. Nothing specific to the app.

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 26 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Just the cost of doing business.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Certainly true for Apple if this is 15% of their operating profits every year.

[–] sadreality@kbin.social 15 points 11 months ago

Mega corp paying protection fee to another mega corp...

FTC see nothing wrong with this market

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Hey Google! If you want you can be my top search engine again... 🤭

[–] TvanBuuren@feddit.nl 4 points 11 months ago

Pretty lies 😂

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

that's pretty fucking insane

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 7 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


According to a Bernstein analyst, that’s how much Google is paying Apple to keep its top spot, representing roughly 15% of the iPhone maker’s annual operating profits.

Bernstein analysts are looking into Apple’s exposure to the Department of Justice’s antitrust lawsuit against Google, originally reported by The Register.

One of the major interest areas of the case is the payments it makes to Apple, classified under the Information Services Agreement (ISA).

“We believe there is a possibility that federal courts [will] rule against Google and force it to terminate its search deal with Apple,” says the Bernstein report.

Google’s Chief Executive Officer Sundar Pichai raised concerns over the bad optics of its Safari deal back in 2007.

“I don’t think it is a good user experience nor the optics is great for us to be the only provider in the browser,” said Pichai in emails to co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin that were revealed in the case.


The original article contains 304 words, the summary contains 158 words. Saved 48%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Eggyhead@artemis.camp 7 points 11 months ago

I’m thankful I have the option to change it.

[–] yoz@aussie.zone 7 points 11 months ago

Fucking hell! and they still fire their employees.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 months ago

Yeah duckduckgo can't possible afford that

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 2 points 11 months ago (3 children)

It's not clear to me how browsers are supposed to make the list of search engines open and not bound to money. Especially for closed source stuff, how would it work? Should they have a git repo to which search engines can make pull requests to to be included in the list of search engines a user can choose from when first starting up Safari?

If the list and process of getting on the list is closed, then one can always just assume that to get on the list, it requires money. But if that's made illegal... yeah, not sure how this should be solved.

[–] Vigge93@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

I mean, you just have to specify the format of the url that the search engine uses, and then the browser just formats in your search string into that. This has existed for years, if not over a decade, at this point, at least on desktop.

[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 11 months ago

Firefox solved this long time ago: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/change-your-default-search-engine-firefox-ios

In desktop Firefox there is also a format in which webpage can inform it's a search engine and the browser would list option to add it in the search selection (Firefox has a selector to choose search engine on each query if you want).

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 5 points 11 months ago

Any user can add their own search engine in desktop versions of Firefox and Chromium-based browsers. Not sure about mobile versions. IIRC search sites can even put an icon in the URL bar to automate the process.

[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

As long as they don’t suddenly stop supporting Apple devices overnight, leaving Apple to scramble to make their own search engine that sucks and still sucks 10 years later. #mapgate

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

There was a recent post about them entertaining making DuckDuckGo the default. I think it's just a negotiation point.

[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I have switched to DDG and like it.

[–] ripcord@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

It was ok to me, but still tended to find the Google results better (especially in verbatim mode) and kept going back to it.

I'm using Kagi right now for a bunch of reasons and it's awesome, but 99.99% of people aren't going to pay money for a search engine. Especially at these prices. But it's way less money than Google, and Bing make off mining our data, or DDG does selling ads and doing SOME mining

[–] ripcord@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

Only for private mode, which made some sense.

[–] ripcord@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But...the maps are actually pretty good now? I thought?

[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

They’re getting better but still takes you to the the back entrance of the place now and then. Plus it doesn’t take me to the shortest drive on my commute. Keeps on taking me to local streets, adding 5 minutes then I disregard the turn and it updates for a shorter drive. But they’re making progress.