this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2024
86 points (91.3% liked)

politics

22615 readers
5788 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Former federal prosecutor Joyce Vance suggests the Supreme Court may reject Donald Trump’s recent legal filing supporting TikTok amid an upcoming U.S. ban.

Trump’s brief emphasizes his own use of TikTok, claiming it as a vital platform for political expression.

Legal expert Vance criticized the filing as self-serving and noted Trump’s representation by John Sauer, his former Solicitor General nominee.

The case concerns whether U.S. companies can continue hosting TikTok after the ban, but Vance doubts the Court will entertain what she describes as a “kleptocratic” move.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 32 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How do I block the tell-me-what-I-want-to-hear news domains from my feed?

[–] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I've seen a lot of these "engagement driven" articles on Lemmy from here. https://www.rawstory.com/

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

Daily beast. New republic. Common dreams.

Echo chambering, which helps us not at all. If you could block all mention of Musk or Keanu from Old Reddit, blocking the echo chamber headlining should be doable here as well.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They're a gagle of kids that ran after an ice cream truck all screaming for it to stop.

Now it's stopped...

But they're gonna riot because they all want the credit for it stopping and believe that means they go first.

They'll spend the whole time it's stopped arguing over who goes first, so eventually it'll drive away and none of them will get any ice cream.

[–] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago (2 children)

That's only if there are elections in 2028

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Hopefully, there will be elections in 2026.

One third of the Senate and all the Congress will be running.

Start working on getting good candidates into the primaries now.

[–] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I wish I had faith in the DNC to run candidates that can win in contested districts in 2026

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 17 points 3 months ago (2 children)

And that don't come out as Republicans immediately after winning.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 11 points 3 months ago

Should hold the same penalties as a poor person's fraud.

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 9 points 3 months ago

Flipping parties should be an immediate vote of no confidence.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

They'll do what they always do, find some MAGA Lite mini-Fettermans. Because the only other people who might run are brain-dead triangulating centrists or progressives, and the corporate moneybags hate the progressives more than they hate fascists.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago

If 2024 taught us anything it's that we have to work if we want good candidates.

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago (2 children)

wasn't banning tiktok trump's idea to begin with?

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago

Before he could get ByteDance to decide they need to placate him, he had to first show that he could make their lives miserable.

The cornerstone of any "protection" scheme.

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 12 points 3 months ago

Has Joyce Vance just been paying zero attention to the current Supreme Court? 6 of them have zero ethics and will rubber-stamp whatever the orange man tells them to do. I really doubt that this little bit of extra corruption will be the line in the sand that forces a corrupt shitbag like Thomas to take a stand against his master.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 months ago

I don't think Tiktok should be banned... but if Trump ends up getting credit for it not being banned I am going to be ill.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah, the Supreme Court is sure to restrain the corrupt madman. Don't regard all the times they didn't as precedent.