this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
282 points (92.2% liked)

Privacy

31974 readers
425 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Quick shout-out to Grayjay: An app to watch videos on any platform - reducing the power of individual services. The Software is open-source and can be found here: https://gitlab.futo.org/videostreaming/grayjay

I will test this out for myself and hope someone here finds this useful.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 103 points 1 year ago (8 children)

It's viewable source, the license does not allow modification and distribution of the modifications. The license also reserves the right to be revoked at any time.

It's source available, but it is not what most people would consider open source in the common usage.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Exactly. Beware of the inevitable enshittification down the line. Once they have the market share, they have no reason not to close their source

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pontata@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

He says in the video on yt that you can fork it and modify it however you want for personal use no problem. You just can't make money distributing it I think.

[–] Coasting0942@reddthat.com 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So basically no chance of it coming to iOS. Given that even open source apps have options to purchase donations in the iOS app, cause developers can’t eat gratitude

[–] pontata@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He also says somewhere in the comments that apple simply wouldn't allow this app on the app store. But there's also the option of sideloading, I think that's free no?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Skimmer@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

App looks legitimately amazing. Seems a bit buggy in alpha but I'm sure it'll be ironed out. I just hope they look into supporting Piped instead of directly connecting to YouTube, as well as SponsorBlock. Once they get those 2 things and iron out some of the bugs, I'll primarily use it for sure. Its a great concept.

[–] LainOfTheWired@lemy.lol 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The app supports plugins for other platforms with development docs coming that I don't think are out yet. So if they don't add it someone else certainly can

[–] PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wouldn't interacting through Piped just introduce an additional communication layer, which makes interacting with YT slower? I see your argument with Piped, but what would be the pros of using Piped which outweighs the additional communication costs?

[–] Skimmer@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pro would just be not directly connecting through Google/YouTube servers, and instead using a proxy. Its a nice privacy benefit. I agree it could make things slower, so I don't think it should completely replace direct connection with YouTube, but I just think the option would be nice to have.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] navi@lemmy.tespia.org 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

I wish somewhere on their site or anywhere in that description they'd say "Android App".

I was a little disappointed as an iOS user browsing their site trying to find the iOS App Store link 😬.

Edit: I appreciate the advice to switch to Android but I really wasn't asking. 😅

[–] sir_reginald@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Apple actively sabotages projects like this one. You're using the wrong phone.

[–] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Silly apple user you don't get to have good apps

[–] LainOfTheWired@lemy.lol 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

All you can hope is that some day they are forced to support 3rd party apps because of some anti monopoly lawsuit telling them they have too.

But good luck with that, Apple is very powerful and can probably just buy out the right lawyers and judges in that situation.

Or if they were forced to it would have an Apple twist on it like they get to approve the 3rd party app stores that are allowed or something.

Just get an Android phone you can put a custom ROM on and you'll have a very good experience.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] StarsBypass@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (8 children)

A shame it is not available for iOS (at least I can see).

[–] Tanya@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your mistake chosing an iPhone.

[–] StarsBypass@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If there was a Linux approach to smartphones, I’d be interested. Instead, it’s a choice between two large corporations. And one of them receives the majority of its income from advertising. So that’s why I chose what I perceived to be the lesser of the two evils.

[–] Quintus@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

The lesser of two evils is Android as it's like they put closed-source software on top of open source software (see AOSP) whereas on iPhone it's all closed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sir_reginald@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Apple actively sabotages these kinds of projects. You're on the wrong device.

[–] Substance_P@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I wonder, are there any decent open source apps available for IOS? Asking for a friend, an Android envious friend, (actually my wife)

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 year ago

https://monal-im.org/

Is a nice XMPP client for iOS. But yeah Apple is pretty hostile to open-source developers.

[–] clmbmb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Louis says somewhere in a comment on the presentation video that they won't have (at least for the time being) an iOS app because Apple wouldn't allow it in the Store, so there's that.

[–] StarsBypass@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hopefully once the alternative App Stores come about (thanks to EU legislation), it might appear in the future.

Or web app approach (like Voyager does with Lemmy).

[–] notenoughbutter@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

alternative app stores are only supposed to be in eu

apple is looking forward to region lock this side loading facility

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 8 points 1 year ago

Really enjoying it so far

[–] Oha@lemmy.ohaa.xyz 8 points 1 year ago

Louis Rossmann is based AF

[–] WeLoveCastingSpellz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not FOSS. So I don't really trust it

[–] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Software simply being FOSS does not equal trust. It never has, and never should.

A free program certainly doesn't make it trustworthy.

edit: as pointed out, free stands for liberty to do as you please, not the financial definition. With that in mind, I definitely wouldn't call Grayjoy FOSS due to the license. I like my made up classification, but maybe this would work better; ROSS, "restricted open source software."

An open source program doesn't make it trustworthy. Unless you vet the program yourself you can never be 100% trusting.

For most of us, we're trusting the smaller community of people who actually go through the code for us. We don't trust individual pieces of FOSS, we trust the FOSS community and recognize that a developer is less likely to place malicious software in the code. However, it's also much easier for a malicious 3rd party to fork the program and infect the code.

I'm confident that anything FUTO puts out is going to be heavily looked over by all the Louis haters and fanboys - if they're up to something shady, we'll hear about it.

This particular software is what I'd call Open Source Donation Ware (OSDW)

"please pay us but we aren't checking if you do. Here's the code, if you want you could copy it and remove the payment all together. However, we retain the legal right to destroy any fork that adds spy/malware."

As a model, I can respect it. It's a good medium between releasing the program to the wild and being closed source. It's also a good model for making money for their work, pretty much like winrar's approach (rip now that windows is finally getting native .rar support). Yes, some programs are more subtle with a little coffee cup button, but as long as it doesn't constantly nag you, I'm okay with a more prominent 'donation' button.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] filcuk@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not sure what part of a free YT+ frontend that doesn't require permissions or an account you don't trust, but the reason is they don't want people to fork it freely and spread a version with malware, like happened to NewPipe.

[–] ram@bookwormstory.social 5 points 1 year ago

I understand the reasoning, but I disagree that it's an effective solution, or if it was, that it'd be worth what you're giving up.

[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think this looks awesome. Curious if it will be added to F-Droid?

[–] moitoi@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

It's not open source. It's only source available.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The app looks cool, but why did you post this in c/privacy? Does this have some extra privacy related features?

[–] GreenIcePear@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It excludes trackers from apps like YT, Twitch etc, so there is an argument to be made

[–] ToxicWaste@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Exactly this. Bonus points: this time privacy is more convenient than the native apps.

load more comments
view more: next ›