this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
414 points (99.5% liked)

politics

19865 readers
3595 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 4am@lemm.ee 17 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Aaanndd they hired him back

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 20 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

That was the racist eugenics one. This one didn't resign from the government.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago

Hard to keep them straight.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 116 points 14 hours ago

it's always the people you most suspect

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 99 points 14 hours ago (3 children)
[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 52 points 13 hours ago

Yeah. Most of the tech industry intern firings I'm aware of are for sex with other interns at work. Horny teen learns self control is a story they can tell.

Leaking trade secrets is not.

[–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 10 hours ago

When I was an intern, a lot of the interns were terrible and didn’t even bother to show up. The big bank just let them finish their internship cause it was more work to fire them…

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 19 points 13 hours ago

These lowlife fascists sure are good at finding each other

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 38 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Not Mr Douchy Short Pants!! He seemed so wholesome!!!

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 14 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

His chosen name is actually “Big Balls.”

(I’m not joking)

https://youtube.com/shorts/uX7Tet-cugA

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 hours ago

I saw that and then realized my user name wouldn't actually hamper a public career as much as I had previously feared.

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 16 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah this guy should never have gotten a security clearance in the first place, even if it was issued by the President himself.

It's like handing the nuclear codes to a known international arms dealer.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 30 points 12 hours ago

I didn't think any of them actually have a clearance. Certainly wouldn't be able to get them through the normal process.

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 10 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Everybody feels so bad for The Onion having to deal with reality and satire bending, but nobody feels for the poor espionage writer.

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 6 points 11 hours ago

"More classified documents were discovered missing from a the President's Florida bathroom today..."

[–] woodenskewer@lemmy.world 13 points 14 hours ago

I guess that twitter girl got invited to their discord server.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 3 points 12 hours ago

That's GREAT news! I'm GLAD he knows my Social Security Number!