this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
161 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19865 readers
4100 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 98 points 10 hours ago

Of course not.

It's not as if Trump is difficult to figure out or predict.

All you have to do really is keep in mind the fact that he has the emotional development of a spoiled toddler.

So all you have to do is ask yourself, for instance, "Would a spoiled toddler share power with Congress?"

And the answer is "No."

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 62 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

That's why it blows my mind how so many republicans are helping him, regular people and politicians alike. Like, y'all know you're not getting a slice of the pie right? In the end he'll only want the ones that are useful, not the ones that are loyal. Loyalty only goes so far when you aren't useful anymore.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 6 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I'm surprised he pardoned the Jan 6 people. I thought he would let them hang because their usefulness was done. The fact that he didn't suggests he wants something more from them.

[–] Tower@lemm.ee 3 points 5 hours ago

They're his future ~~brown shirts~~ red hats.

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

They're still very useful. Gives the rest of us something to focus on while he does worse things behind the scenes.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 20 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

By the time the average schmoe makes it Congress they've been a big shot for years. They were a star in high school, important at college, had their pick of jobs after graduating, and were hand picked by The Establishment to run for office. They can't comprehend that Trump doesn't care about any of that.

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

It's kinda the same thing as talking to my MAGA father. Saying "you know he doesn't give a shit about you, right?" Always falls on deaf ears.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

blows my mind how so many republicans are helping him

I never understood fascism until Trump came in. It works not because he gives orders, but because others *want to give him the power.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It's early stage and anyone that follows his orders are either fascist too or idiots. Fast-forward 10 years, if the GOP still haven't been edged out it will be an automatic felony and mandatory jail time to disobey a President.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

I'm saying they don't just "follow" if ordered. Fascism comes about because people want to do it. They want to give their power and support to the leader. They implement what the direction is without being given an order.

[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 11 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I’ve had this exact discussion with my father. We both think it’s absurdly short sighted for the SCOTUS to give Trump immunity like they did, even if they reserve the right to define what is in bounds. The moment he has unlimited power, they’re toast.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

The moment he has unlimited power,

He already does. What enforcement mechanism does the Supreme Court have? None.

If Trump decides he wants to start ignoring the Supreme Court tomorrow, what the hell are they going to do about it? Especially if Congress is on his side?

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

What are they going to do? Well, I'll tell you: John Roberts will consider withholding his vote for Trump's 2028 campaign.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

He'll write a supporting argument stating that this does not grant precedence for future cases with other presidents.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Biden pretty much already went through this dance with student debt relief. Trump will throw a dozen things at the wall all at once in the hope just one thing sticks. There's only so many judges and hours in the day, so just like with the media he'll overwhelm the system. Until a judge rules on it, Trump and the whole of the GOP considers his every action legal.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 10 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Wannabe Dictator Wants To Be A Dictator

FTFY

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 2 points 2 hours ago

Right? Why the fuck are we tiptoing around this word.

He's acting like a dictator and feckless Republicans are letting him do it.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 21 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

"may not want"?

lol

has already blatantly and repeatedly stepped on congress' toes and assumed much of their powers. he isn't sharing and no, he doesn't 'want to' either.

this should be infuriating to every member of congress, regardless of party..

so.. wutcha gunna do about it, dear members of congress? stop him? or be a willing and liable accomplice who are already forgotten by the asshole in chief now that he literally doesn't need you anymore.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

They're happy just riding his coattails and picking up his scraps along the way. They won't turn on him unless the donor spigot runs dry because they're irrelevant to the process and donors would rather go straight to the Pres.

[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 7 points 8 hours ago

Republicans in Congress won't complain until they notice they're no longer worth bribing.

[–] TheCriticalMember@aussie.zone 5 points 9 hours ago

It's like they created a monster and set it loose thinking they could control it, but turns out they can't, because it's a monster. Nobody could have seen that coming...

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 4 points 8 hours ago

Trump share toys? I doubt that even happened when he was a child. He was bred for this kind of lunacy. Too bad all those undecided democrats decided not to vote.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Trump
Not
Share

Yeah, obviously. He doesn't share anything with anyone.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

not true.

he shares blame.

he's so 'generous' even, he'll let others have all of it.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

He doesn't share blame. Blame is for other people, not him. He is above blame by birthright, as far as he's concerned.

Sharing it means that at one point, he had some or all of it. Trump has already gone on record during his first term directly saying he refuses to accept responsibility for anything. Heck, he just got finished saying that our trade deals with Canada and Mexico were bad and tried to deflect blame away, even though he was the one who negotiated them in the first place.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

lol “may”

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 1 points 9 hours ago

So? It's not like a room of 5 year olds was Gunned Down! Who cares about the Constitution?