this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2025
294 points (96.8% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

3839 readers
5 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 76 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I believe that is 381 km squared, not 381 square kilometers. Vastly different areas. Germany is much larger than 381 square kilometers.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 33 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Oops. You are correct. Thank you. Fixing.

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

If it's a square 381km x 381km then that's 145161km² (and I'm not aware that there's any difference between "square kilometres" and "kilometres squared", is there?)

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Square x and x squared is the same thing. The proper way to say this is "A square of 381 km width"

[–] Sadbutdru@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 weeks ago

It's very common to use km^2 (or m^2 or whatever) as a unit of area, with the understanding that a square with x km sides has area x^2 km^2. I can see what you're saying, but I think most people would call that area 'over 145 000 square km' or something, rather than talk about the side length.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

In writing it's not clear, but in spoken word you usually stress it like (381 kilometers) *pause* squared, which makes it clear the square applies to both value and unit, (381km)², whereas 381 (kilometers squared) is just 381km²

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

The title still looks wrong to me

Probably should take this post down, since it’s misleading.

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 weeks ago

381^2^ k^2^m^2^

[–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 35 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Some questions...

  1. How is this measured in sq km, rather than something digital such as pixels?
  2. Why is it 381? How did they arrive at that number?
  3. Why is there any limit at all, if it's this big?
[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 48 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Beginning with PDF 1.6, the size of the default user space unit may be set with the UserUnit entry of the page dictionary. Acrobat 7.0 supports a maximum UserUnit value of 75,000, which gives a maximum page dimension of 15,000,000 inches (14,400 * 75,000 * 1 ⁄ 72). The minimum UserUnit value is 1.0 (the default).

15 million inches happens to be exactly 381 km Source

[–] gressen@lemm.ee 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Arigion@feddit.org 14 points 2 weeks ago

True. But thankfully most of the world uses centimetrs instead of inches nowadays. 😉

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 30 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

To satisfy the anything but metric postulate: 381 km originally are 15 million inches.

However, using some tricks, the size isn't limited to that.

https://alexwlchan.net/2024/big-pdf/

Remark: The side length of the square correspods to 381 km, subsequently, its area is 145161 km^2 .
381 km^2 are slightly smaller than the city of Cologne.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Good to see Germany won't run out of PDF for their digital mapping efforts and need a costly replacement.

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

I'm pretty sure, we would use a costly alternative anyways.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Ok, now where can we get a printer to print that?

[–] glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

a global network of printers

[–] SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

A national network will suffice.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I think the play would be to get one that's modular (I suspect it's been done) and just keep building it out. The trick would be if the Earth is flat enough of it to sit nicely on. If not, you could cheat by slightly changing the DPI further from the center, so it would be a sphere section.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What is the smallest file size possible for a black PDF of this size? How about one with a solid color pattern, or a standard pattern?

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Physical size is just a parameter, unless you insert formatting and stuff which needs to save data per page/region. Otherwise you can have just vector graphics of fixed data size which gets scaled on rendering to fit the physical limit.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So you could have a very small file that has a huge area, got it!

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 weeks ago

easy to do in svg, just start with something like , then and you're mostly done; a gradient or pattern requires more than that, but vector graphics don't really care how large you say they are

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

funny, because adobe illustrator shits itself at a couple m²

[–] magikmw@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

DWG enthusiasts in tatters.