this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
317 points (99.7% liked)

politics

21225 readers
4709 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Some good news and a reminder to always fight back. You can win by surprise

State representative Zooey Zephyr spoke out against a bill that sought to ban drag performances and Pride parades in Montana, introduced by a Republican member of of the house

[....]

The bill was defeated by 55 to 44, after 13 Republicans flipped to support Democrats.

Representative SJ Howell then spoke out against an even more extreme bill that sought to remove transgender children from their parents.

[...]

The bill was defeated by 71 votes to 27, after 29 Republicans defected.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am glad they failed, but Jesus Christ. There were still 27 elected officials, about a quarter of that legislative body, who thought children should be separated from their parents because they're transgender. What the fuck?

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm surprised you're surprised.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

It's not that I'm surprised, but mainly saying that this isn't the feel-good story of bipartisanship taking down a bad idea that the headline leads you to think. There's still a significant (if not majority) in favor of this

[–] Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hope this is indicative of maybe not every republican wants me dead

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is also indicative that sometimes we can successfully pressure them to change their votes

We can win this fight

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 15 points 1 day ago

This is good news!

But the constant barrage:

the part-time legislature has spent more than half of its days this session pushing such bills through committees and the house floor, with Republicans largely voting in lockstep

..is by design.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

It's nice to see that there are some lines even republicans are not yet willing to cross.

[–] Today@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Kinda wish i had chosen zooeyzephyr as my lemmy name.

[–] donuts@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago
[–] otto@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 day ago

I wonder who will regret this more?

What do you think? Give your opinion but below.