this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
544 points (98.2% liked)

News

23274 readers
3097 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Bettersten Wade’s search for her adult son ended when she discovered that an officer had run him over — and without telling her, authorities buried him in a pauper’s field.

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] irreticent@lemmy.world 73 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Blackout@kbin.social 31 points 1 year ago

This is America
Don't catch you slippin' now

[–] Coasting0942@reddthat.com 15 points 1 year ago

I’m so tired of Enforcers choosing the most expensive option for the taxpayers.

[–] BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago

What a shitty investigator. It took the new one less than a week to figure it out. I can't see how this could have possibly happened for any reason other than malice or gross incompetence. Either way both the original investigator and the rest of the department need to be looked into.

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hope very soon police can face the same amount of suffering they dish out to people and families.

[–] at_an_angle@lemmy.one 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If that were to become a reality, they would be no cops. Is that what you want? No cops? Because that sounds nice.

[–] medgremlin@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Every time I hear about (more) police violence, I just get stuck thinking about the number of times I've been assaulted by patients as a healthcare worker and how I was still required to put their safety above my own if at all possible...including the one that was twice my weight and tried to strangle me.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

There seems to be an inverse correlation between fearing for your life and fearing negative repercussions...

[–] TheJims@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah but she literally didn’t even thank them for their service.

[–] Hotdogman@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

PSSH, the gall

[–] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

His name was Dexter Wade.

[–] BertramDitore@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This behavior is cowardly and disgusting. There’s no excuse.

Also, I didn’t realize we still had “pauper’s fields.” The repeated use of the word “pauper” in this article makes me really uncomfortable. I’m not from the south, so maybe it’s a regional thing? But that term strikes me as antiquated and dehumanizing.

[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Just curious what word would you use? Those without wealth or status have always been dehumanized regardless of the terms used for them.

As for right or wrong, pauper's fields will always be a thing as long as there are poor and indigent people. Have you ever wondered what happens to the homeless when they die? Many end up unified in death. So there is no way to inform family if they ever have any.

I believe that it is much more common to cremate unclaimed deceased then bury them these days. Even still the ashes are not carefully interred, but just spread out on a common site.

[–] BertramDitore@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That makes sense, and I totally understand the utility of having municipal graves for unclaimed remains. I guess I would just call them that: unclaimed or unrepresented remains. I’m not saying “pauper” is inherently bigoted or anything, it just took me by surprise and struck me as a dehumanizing label that fits better in Medieval England. I don’t think we would call someone a pauper to their face in 2023, so I’m not sure why we’d use it to refer to their remains.

[–] Laticauda@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah I prefer the older term "potter's field" personally.

I don't disagree with you but honestly I much more have a problem with the need for a place like this than whatever people feel comfortable calling it. Part of me would much prefer an uncomfortable term. It is an uncomfortable practice, a nicer name will not change that.

[–] Laticauda@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't think their issue is with the practice, just the term used. It's like saying "poor people cemetery", kinda distasteful sounding. They could just call it something else with less stigma attached than the term "pauper", like calling it a public graveyard. Or just use the older term "potter's field".

[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I actually disagree with the practice not the name. There is a long history of giving nice names to distasteful practices to hide their true nature. In a way distasteful names are at least honest.

[–] Laticauda@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not sure what alternatives you think we should have for burying unidentified people. I could see an argument to be made about how poor people shouldn't have to be relegated to certain types of cemeteries or graves just because they can't afford "proper" ones. But generally even if you took away cost people usually choose where they want to be buried based on various factors if possible, or their families do for them if they haven't, so you need to have a system for people whose choice and affiliations are otherwise unknown. The original intent of potter's fields was for burying strangers and unknown people, and that's ideally what the practice should be more about rather than a class thing imo. And in that case, it's more of a necessary practice than anything else, and the dead deserve to be referred to with dignity. It's not like they're the ones who chose to be buried there, yet they bear the brunt of the term "pauper", giving an "uncomfortable name to an uncomfortable practice" is a nice idea and all but the only people who suffer for it are the people being buried there, not the ones doing the burying. So it just seems rather mean and unnecessary. The term isn't a commentary on the practice, it's a commentary on the people it's being practiced on, who arguably deserve to be treated better than that.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People like doing this, but the stigma remains with the thing, not the word. Until attitudes change, changing the word does nothing.

[–] Laticauda@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's not really how it works in every case. Take slurs for example, the stigma is very much in the word, and referring to people by the terms they prefer to be referred by instead of a slur definitely does more than nothing. There's a reason why many groups and companies like to rebrand after a particularly devastating scandal, or why certain communities 9r ideologies use alternative terms for themselves, like fascists calling themselves identitarians, and so on. Words can have more influence on how we perceive something than you think.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 38 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The decision to call the police was difficult for Bettersten. She did not trust them. In 2019, her 62-year-old brother died after a Jackson officer slammed him to the ground. The officer was convicted of manslaughter but is appealing.

Two of her family, wow. Now, I don't know what the environment is like there, but the son was crossing a highway at night on meth. This one could be.. I'm not sure of the word.. no bad behavior? Accident? But the lack of identification and contact is absolutely absurd.

[–] JoBo@feddit.uk 29 points 1 year ago

They did identify him. They just didn't contact her.

Police had known Dexter’s name, and hers, but failed to contact her, instead letting his body go unclaimed for months in the county morgue.

Disgusting behaviour.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago

Darnella Frazier is the woman who recorded George Floyd's murder. Her uncle was also killed by police. Recently a man was released and awarded several hundred thousand dollars after spending over a decade in prison for a crime he didn't commit. After release, he was shot and killed by police. The police are a street gang, legitimized by capital in exchange for capital's occasionally being allowed to direct the police's constant stream of violence.

[–] rbhfd@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Yeah, the cover-up is the bad part.

Might as well be considered a hit-and-run.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 24 points 1 year ago

In 2019, her 62-year-old brother died after a Jackson officer slammed him to the ground.

A family having to deal with this much awfulness... it beggars belief.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Jfc. That's was heavy.

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

God Damn Mississippi! What the fuck are you doing?!

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

deleted by creator

[–] superguy@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

Really shitty article.

Just give us the facts without all the dramatization.