FUCKING FINALLY! This was the biggest scientific mystery and we finally figured it out.
It’s things like this that really make me see that humans have limitless potential and can solve any problem handed to us.
Way to go scientists!
this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
45 points (100.0% liked)
Science
13029 readers
100 users here now
Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Haha, I'm so glad you're hyped about this. It might be the most excitement I'll ever see for menopause.
At first I thought it was just a general mammal thing, and it probably is, but the question really is why only some mammals have evolved to survive after the reproductional age.
The article briefly mentions food availability as a key, and there are many other external causes, so it's still not understood how or if longevity is inherited. In humans it's generelly accepted that a long lifespan is partly inherited and partly due to society.
The similarities to other species is interesting to confirm, because it shows that the construction of a society can maybe influence the genetic evolution. In short, it's (maybe) a sort of indirect feedback loop, where if a society can afford to have old individuals, it will also evolve to more individuals getting old. I realise that evolution itself can not do this alone, but it can apparently take advantage of happening in a society that enables this.
Anyway that's just my take on it, I'm not a biologist.
One older female named Marlene, for instance, outlived her eldest, a male named Dolphy, with whom she was very close [...] she took up a solitary existence and moved away into the northern part of their territory. [...] Marlene would show up within 15 minutes, begging for meat. Even into her very old age, she'd almost always get meat.
And then Marlene shares half of her meat with a bunch of servals. And spends most of her day cleaning serval poop around her. (I'm joking.)
Serious now, here's a link for further info on the reproductive conflict hypothesis. It's mostly used for humans, but it might be partially true for chimps acc. to the text from the OP - specially due to the female dispersal.
There are two key elements here:
- Resource scarcity: trying to raise too many children at the same time, in a given clan, puts at risk the likelihood of all those children to survive until adulthood.
- Asymmetric relatedness: the children of an older female, in a chimp clan, are mostly unrelated to the incoming females (they're basically in-laws). However, those children of the incoming young females are likely related to the older female (they're likely her grandchildren).
Because of those two things, it might be advantageous to keep the older female alive, gathering resources for children, but not having children of her own. ...that's what menopause does.
Some maths with made up numbers illustrating this point
Let's say that Alice has a son called Bob. Bob mates with Charlotte. And since they're chimps, Charlotte went to live with Alice and Bob. They're now a clan, with shared resources. Including the fridge.
If the clan raises a new child, there's a [made up] 90% chance that it'll reach adulthood. But if the clan tries to raise two children, they'll both become malnourished, and each will only have 20% odds of surviving.
From Alice's PoV, her own children share 1/2 of her genes. However, Charlotte's children share 1/4, as they're Alice's grandchildren.
From Charlotte's PoV, her own children share 1/2 of her genes. However, Alice's children share zero of their genes with Charlotte - they're Charlotte's in-laws, not relatives! As such, Charlotte will never give up having her own children for the sake of Alice's.
So Charlotte will always have a child. In this situation, Alice can choose between having another child or not.
If Alice decides to give up having children, she'll get a grandchild from Bob and Charlotte 90% of the time. So on average Alice shares (1/4)*(90%) = 22.5% of her genes with the newer gen.
If Alice insists having yet another child, four things can happen:
- only Alice's child survive. This will happen 16% of the time. Alice shares 1/2 of her genes with her new child.
- only Charlotte's child survive. This will happen 16% of the time. Alice shares 1/4 of her genes with her new grandchild.
- both children die. This will happen 64% of the time. Alice shares nothing with the kids because they're both dead.
- both children survive. This will happen 4% of the time. Alice will share 1/2 + 1/4 = 3/4 of her genes with both kids.
If you do the maths for the above, Alice should expect to share, on average 15%, of her genes with the (0, 1 or 2) child[ren] of the newer gen. It's actually less than the 22.5% that she would, if she gave up having children. As such, it's evolutionarily advantageous for Alice to not have further children.
And, if the clan had the resources to raise two children instead of one, the same reasoning still applies - it's better for Alice to leave Charlotte to give her two grandchildren than to put their resources at risk by trying to get her own new kids.
Nature seems extremely chaotic and extremely calculating at the same time.
It is both things - statistics on random events. Einstein would argue that God doesn't play dice with the universe, but it seems that the gods play poker with living things instead.
🤖 I'm a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:
Click here to see the summary
Catching a wild chimpanzee's urine involves good positioning, a bit of luck, and — hopefully — minimal splashback on your face.
It may not be the most glamorous job in science, but years of dedicated chimpanzee urine sample collection in Uganda's Kibale National Park have revealed that older females undergo hormonal changes much like those in menopausal humans.
This chimpanzee "change", reported by Dr Langergraber and his colleagues in the journal Science, is the first time that signs of menopause have been found in wild non-human primates.
The study, part of the Ngogo Chimpanzee Project, also found females in the group frequently lived long after their reproductive years were up.
Aside from humans, the only other wild animals that spend a fair chunk of their life post-reproduction are a few whales, including orcas — species in which older females tend to help raise their grandchildren.
Dr Langergraber joined the project in 2001 and has spent a couple of months each year since (pandemic permitting) following and observing the chimpanzee community.
Saved 85% of original text.