_portrait.jpg){kind=link}
Leader of the “Feed the Leopards” party still claims they will go away after the next feeding.
this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
331 points (96.6% liked)
Leopards Ate My Face
7493 readers
622 users here now
Rules:
- The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
- Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
- If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
- Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
- For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
- Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
- This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
- All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.
Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).
Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Hang on. Schumer is a fucking coward, no argument from me there. But who's the leopard here, whose face is getting eaten, and what is the actual face being eaten?
Something about Liz Cheney and a big tent
Republican voters vote for the leopards to eat not just theirs, but everyones' faces. Well, everyone who's who's not rich, anyway. Democrats in power enable the leopards to eat more faces, even though their voters did not vote for it.
That... has nothing to do with the linked article. What specific policy is being talked about in the article, and who is supporting that policy only to get hurt by the policy itself applying to them?
The terminology has existed long before this article and is much more widespread.
Per the sidebar for this community, "leopards ate my face" is a metaphor specifically for the 2-part case of:
- someone supporting an oppressive person or policy ("I support the Leopards Eating Faces Party")
- only to get oppressed by the very person or policy they supported ("I didn't expect them to eat my face")
So, once again, what specifically is this article saying that Schumer supported, and how is he now being oppressed by it? Because younger Democrats giving him shit for enabling fascism isn't actually oppression.
People continue to be blown away that the party that tefuses to stop the fascist party continue to not stop fascists. I'm sure that Shumer handing Trump everything he wanted is all Hexbear's fault too
I think a lot of us are still in denial about rotating villains, ratchet effect, Overton window etc.
It stings, but I hope my face is at least chewy. (Not in the right state, but I feel this one applies)
Not sure if I know any young Democrats who campaigned for Schumer in NY, and if anything would probably have supported a primary challenger if they were more invested or had someone to rally behind. But voting for him over what, a Republican? Do they even seriously run for Senate seats there?
Is there an animal that works instead of leopard? "I didn't think the ostrich would bury it's head when the leopards ate my face"?
The Dems that voted for this bill will 100% have primary challengers.