this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2025
768 points (99.1% liked)

News

28345 readers
5147 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

US stocks were sharply lower Friday as investors digested souring consumer sentiment and inflation data that showed an uptick in one of the Federal Reserve’s key gauges, underscoring the delicate state of the economy as businesses brace for President Donald Trump’s tariffs.

The Dow tumbled 750 points, or 1.77%, on Friday. The broader S&P 500 fell 2.1% and the Nasdaq Composite slid 2.8%.

. . .

Wall Street was also grappling with Trump’s announcement on Wednesday of 25% tariffs on all cars shipped into the US, set to go into effect April 3. Trump also announced tariffs on car parts like engines and transmissions, set to take effect “no later than May 3,” according to the proclamation he signed.

MBFC
Archive

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 6 days ago

Good.... goood...

[–] Ironfist@lemmy.ca 133 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 70 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Billionaires and corporations are absolutely winning, in the foreseeable future.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Asetru@feddit.org 100 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

We also believe the dynamic macro environment has contributed to a more cautious consumer

Am I getting this right? Is this double speak for "the government is fucking up so badly, people try to save some wealth for the inevitable fall of society"?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Looks like I made the right choice pulling most of my 401k out of stock/blended funds and into stable bonds.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 91 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Looks like I made the right choice by not saving money at all and working until I die.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 71 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue

[–] hemmes@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit amphetamines

[–] SilverCode@lemm.ee 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

At least you don't have a drinking problem

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lanske@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

It's going well with the 'Make America Great Again' over the other side of the pond

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Bro just quit buying avocado toast and pull yourself up by them bootstraps, you're just not working hard enough bro get on the grind and then you can maybe retire in a slightly larger cardboard box

[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

Maybe even be able to afford the ritzier corrugated cardboard boxes everyone’s talking about?

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (16 children)

Looks like I made the right choice pulling most of my 401k out of stock/blended funds and into stable bonds.

You've made HALF the right choice. You "sold high", which is great!

However, the harder part is knowing when to go back in for the "buy low" part. If you're out of the market when that recovery occurs you'll be missing out on those gains. I've look at historical recoveries and can tell there is no way I'll know when that time is. I will guess wrong every time.

I hope you're better at it than I am.

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Timing the exact top and bottom is impossible, but you can always sell at an all-time high and buy at a 52 week low.

Personally, I find it more effective for myself if I frame it in terms of "owning the most shares" instead of "making the most dollars".

If I started with 100 shares and now have 200 shares, I consider that a win, even if the 200 shares together are worth less than the 100 shares were at one time.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Timing the exact top and bottom is impossible, but you can always sell at an all-time high

An all-time high? So on point over the prior record and you sell?

and buy at a 52 week low.

I'm not understanding your strategy here. What are you accomplishing by putting your money back into the market at the dollar figure equal to the lowest value in the last year (52 weeks)? Especially if you sold at one point over the prior record (the all time high) you could be out of the market for years while stocks are on a rapid increase. The last 2 years of the S&P500 were both north of 23% returns back to back. Using your method you would have sold sometime in 2022 losing all those HUGE gains.

What if the recover occurs prior to stocks ever hitting the 52 week low? You'd still be out of the market and will have missed the recovery.

Personally, I find it more effective for myself if I frame it in terms of “owning the most shares” instead of “making the most dollars”.

If I started with 100 shares and now have 200 shares, I consider that a win, even if the 200 shares together are worth less than the 100 shares were at one time.

This confuses me even more. Number of shares is completely irrelevant. Stock splits double shares (and half values), a reverse stock split would double value (but half number of shares). I mean, if you're just interested in number of shares, you do you, but most people use stocks as an investment vehicle where the value of those stocks is primary value (voting rights being a second value but most people don't care about that).

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 6 days ago (5 children)

If you can't even understand that I am obviously not including things like stock splits, then I don't think my comment was intended for you.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The right time to go back in is whenever this admin is done, there is no "low" when the floor keeps falling out.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That sounds like a rational answer. Stock markets are not rational. Also, who's to say the next admin isn't just a carbon copy of this one?

[–] independantiste@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You can never time the lowest point. What you can do however is guarantee yourself a massive gain over the next few years when the stocks inevitably go back to pre-trump levels by buying it now, which is already much lower than it was 2 months ago

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's great, until our money is worthless and hyper inflation sets in. Nothing will keep your money safe from that.

[–] themobrules@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That is a good point. I think Turkey is a good example of that happening right now. I don't know that they are technically an example of hyperinflation, but they have had extremely high inflation.

[–] Magister@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

About Jan 21st, I moved 50% to "international developed market", there is 0 stock from USA in the fund.

https://finviz.com/map.ashx?t=etf&st=ytd

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

wow, pandemic numbers without a pandemic. trump rules...!

[–] match@pawb.social 16 points 1 week ago

imagine what it'll look like when the second pandemic hits

[–] griff@lemmings.world 14 points 1 week ago

Stable genius getting results!!!

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

since 2023

So what's the explanation for why stocks dropped so much in 2023?

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago

Inflation was part of it, also the Russian incursion into Ukraine was sparking fears of ww3.

The actions of this admin are reigniting those fears and we’re witnessing similar results in the market.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›