People need to realise the next step in civilisation is not stealing labour so eventually we can transition to a society that gets it's production from "play" (people produce what they like & how they like it) not from "work" (forced production to maximise financial profit of an entity).
this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
91 points (100.0% liked)
World News
22287 readers
131 users here now
Breaking news from around the world.
News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
For US News, see the US News community.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Meanwhile, the US is trying to go to 60 hour workweeks and 6-day workweeks.
Labor needs to organize, and the rich need to be broken.
And don't forget, we also gotta get our children involved. It's outrageous that government regulations are preventing their small fingers from taking advantage of lucrative opportunitues. They yern for the mines!
It will never revert back to that historic barbaric practice. The little fingers will be good at assembling Temu junk on the production line.
996 incomming
The economy used to function with half the adult population (men) working 40h a week.
I'm not surprised that it continues to function with the entire adult population working 36h a week.
The fact that it isn't way below 20h is a scandal in my opinion.
Cause every work hour achieves so much more productivity now than what it did in the 50s.
But all that productivity benefits the owners, not the workers.
~~I don't understand your rationale in your opening sentence. A larger population means a proportionate increase in workload.~~
I am totally with you on the productivity angle. Politicians, academics, journalists warn us about an ageing population resulting in an inverted population pyramid. "Who will look after the elderly?" they cry but never touch on productivity. Even the Left are silent. Strange
The entry point is about women, who previously primarily filled the role of housewives, entering the workforce. Since then, the share of people going to work practically doubled, but the working hours did not decrease, so capitalists got twice as much labor, and as it became harder and harder to lead a family on a single income, they essentially just exploited that extra labor for free.
OK I understand what you mean now.
Right wing hijacked women's right to work turning it into women's necessity to work for ever increasing mortgage/rent with half of it being siphoned off into childcare.
No more could a household rely on a single bread-winner.
Yep!
Written by Sarah Jensen
Meet Sarah Jensen, a dynamic 30-year-old American web content writer, whose expertise shines in the realms of entertainment including film, TV series, technology, and logic games. Based in the creative hub of Austin, Texas, Sarah’s passion for all things entertainment and tech is matched only by her skill in conveying that enthusiasm through her writing.
"Creative hub." Not really in 2025. Austin is a gentrified techbro hub that's priced creatives out of the city (unless you're willing to build out a van). Honestly, the whole bio is like "maybe put down the Kool-Aid" (dynamic? really?). It's also off register for a story about social issues, which is not among the listed interests.
We're also the 11th-largest metro area in the U.S. AP really needs to get with the times and make us a dateline city.
Does tearing her bio apart contribute meaningfully to the discussion her article is facilitating?
It's relevant to her expertise in the area. It also calls into question the overall state of the outlet that this is considered an acceptable bio.
Questioning sources is just as important as discussing the contents.
I don't at all disagree with questioning sources, but I'd rather call attention to the lack of provided sources. Going all-in on her bio reads as pretty mean-spirited as opposed to truth-seeking.
This is worth a second response. In 1999, we ran out of reporters without considering that the State of the University was that night. So, who's picked to cover this? Worst possible choice: me.
Great. Columnist sent to cover hard news.
Excerpts include UW President Richard McCormick "stressed the need for panhandling" on A1.
Someone sends me to cover a field I'm not familiar with? That's malpractice.
I'm inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt as allegedly they're fully student-run but I defer to your experience in journalism.
It's certainly a crucial part of the path. But that's at GA. By the time you're doing specialist reporting?
Not really, but it does highlight it's written for views.
The article had no citations or links to sources. It only links to other articles in the site.
Lack of sources definitely is a valid criticism. Just feels like maybe that should be the criticism instead of a bio critique, but hey-ho.
Super fucking cool to see it succeed in practice. I hope it catches on, I really do.
9 hour days though :(
Hopefully countries who are already on 38 hour weeks will try 4 days of 8 hours.
Nice to see that it went well.