this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
96 points (97.1% liked)

politics

22575 readers
4954 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, a leading advocate for "Liberation Day" tariffs scheduled for April 2, faces growing criticism within Trump's administration.

Sources indicate Lutnick will likely be blamed if the tariffs backfire economically, with insiders describing him as giving Trump "bad advice" and pushing "crazy" aggressive tariff policies, unlike Treasury Secretary Bessent's more measured approach.

While White House spokesperson Desai maintains the administration is unified, corporate America fears significant economic damage.

Trump reportedly enjoys the uncertainty, expecting nations to "grovel" for deals to avoid punitive tariffs.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 12 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

So they already assigned a scapegoat for Trumps deranged ideas?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 hours ago

Throwing others under the bus to cover his own ass is what he does best.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We all know its you, Trump. I'm not burning any fall guys willing or not. I want you to feel the repercussions of your actions. I want you to feel the weight of the world. I want you to beg for relief, and the only form you are met with is a hole to die in.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 12 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Trump needs sycophants and patsies or he can't do a fucking thing. If Lutnik is burned for basically doing what he was asked then it sends the message to his inner circle that following orders is not a guaranteed way to keep your head off the chopping block. This kind of volatile leadership style is how coups occur. Almost none of them probably care about Trump's goals. They just want to ride the tidal wave so they're not crushed by it.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 3 points 12 hours ago

Or assassinations the list of autocrats who ended up dead because they pissed off their inner circle is long indeed. All it'd take for Trump to die is for one of his inner circle to get burned at the wrong time and oops Trump was pushed down the stairs and broke his hip.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Corporate America:

"Oh no, we'll only be able to buy up everything from the poor suckers at a bargain price!"

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Companies don't like uncertainty.

[–] Throbbing_Banjo@midwest.social 4 points 13 hours ago

Capitalists and shareholders fucking love it though, that's why there's a Volatility Index fund you can invest in.

Every one of these little mini-craahes is like a fire sale for the rich. Watch it drop all day again today and then rally fifteen minutes before close.

Are the leopards caged, or do they roam freely?

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Watching interviews, he's parroting everything dear leader says. Just as nuts as the boss, can't see the difference.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What the heck??? This is bizarre...

Lutnick was trying to competently play "good cop, bad cop" diplomacy for Trump, because of Trump's personal fixations with tariffs, and was mildly successful as far as successes in this administration go. But I remembered we can't have any semblance of independent thinking in the Trump administration, no siree. It all makes sense now.

[–] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

No fall guys for Felon Drink Bleach. This is entirely on him.