this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
287 points (97.4% liked)

News

36292 readers
2680 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In seeking a judge’s order, the government was drawing attention to the former president’s longstanding habit of attacking those involved in criminal cases against him.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WorldieBoi@lemmy.world 54 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Can America ask for a Protective Order against trump?

[–] kittenbridgeasteroid@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I vote that we send him to Greenland and tell him he's the king now.

[–] nxn@lemm.ee 27 points 2 years ago (2 children)

What has Greenland done to deserve that?

[–] Tigbitties@kbin.social 19 points 2 years ago

They lied about being green.

[–] kittenbridgeasteroid@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I mean, it's mostly an inhospitable wasteland.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

What makes it inhospitable?

[–] VanillaGorilla@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Like death valley, let's dump him there.

[–] orphiebaby@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Nah, that's close to Trump Tower, isn't it? I drove next to something with his name on it when we passed through Las Vegas from California to Minnesota.

[–] Jimbabwe@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

Traitors get hanged.

[–] magnor@lemmy.magnor.ovh 4 points 2 years ago

Nah. Give him his own submarine. Better yet, let him design it. How hard could it be?

[–] Neuron@lemm.ee 51 points 2 years ago

Just to be clear, it's not like a protective order for their person (though Jack Smith and others already have to travel with large security details because of the stochastic terrorism of Trump and most other Republicans), but a protective order of the evidence in the case given through discovery. So before the trial the prosecution has to show the defense all the evidence it has, which is called discovery. The prosecutors here are concerned that Trump is going to leak that info in some way, like witnesses lists, so that his supporters can harass and intimidate witnesses on his behalf. Or maybe even bribe them or something. What the prosecution is seeking is a protective order to prevent trump from releasing publicly any evidence that they obtain through discovery. Normally there wouldn't be anything preventing a defendent from releasing that info, though most sane people wouldn't generally want their incriminating evidence released publicly. If the order is granted and Trump violates it, he could theoretically be held in contempt and go to prison where he no longer can violate the order.

[–] takeda@kbin.social 43 points 2 years ago

This is absolutely how he should be handled from the start. A lot of people dismissed him "because he is an idiot" and that enabled him to cause damage to our country.

[–] AwkwardPenguin@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] takeda@kbin.social 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Upvote this and not mine. Not sure what happened but the link got buried in formatting somehow so I just stripped it away. takeda should get credit for providing the actual link to non-paywalled content.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago

The ad is one of Mr. Trump’s most aggressive denigrations of the prosecutors, whom he has consistently denounced.

Doesn't america have libel laws?