this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
353 points (98.1% liked)

politics

22710 readers
4568 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump was reportedly “unhappy” and “frustrated” after learning Elon Musk would be briefed at the Pentagon in March on secret U.S. war plans involving China.

The meeting, initially planned to include classified content, was scaled back after public backlash over Musk’s business ties to China.

Though Trump dismissed the reports as “fake news,” insiders say he was upset about being blindsided.

Musk, who requested the briefing, called the coverage “propaganda” and threatened prosecution over leaks.

all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] libra00@lemmy.world 15 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

I hope this is not news to anyone, but Trump does not give a fuck about conflicts of interest as was made abundantly clear by his first term. What he cares about is looking good; specifically in making sure that everyone remembers he is king dick of the universe and Musk is subordinate.

  • He said he wouldn't include Musk in the briefing to establish that impression.
  • Obviously he was lying and was going to include him anyway; oligarchs don't spend that kind of money without making sure they're getting value for it.
  • Now he's making excuses for having done what he always intended to do so he can maintain the illusion that he is in control.
  • But also he's a moron, so this excuse makes it look like he's not keeping his house in order, and any remotely media-literate adult can see through this shit clear as day.
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

Just start up a signal chat. Make sure to include a journalist.

[–] ZeroCool@lemmy.ca 163 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Donald Trump was reportedly “unhappy” and “frustrated” after learning Elon Musk would be briefed at the Pentagon in March on secret U.S. war plans involving China.

Who the fuck is in charge here? I mean, it's obvious Trump sold the Presidency to Musk for the $290mil he spent getting Trump elected and as a result - out of prison. But it still needs to be said. There is nothing normal about a President being upset because he "found out" that an unelected neo-Nazi from South Africa is being briefed on war plans. Trump isn't just the weakest President of all time, he's a straight-up puppet.

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 94 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Who the fuck is in charge here?

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

I feel like it should be Putin controlling Musk controlling Trump

[–] xzot746@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think Trump would be smiling more.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 2 points 14 hours ago

Has he thanked Putin yet?

[–] killabeezio@lemm.ee 46 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

You know what trips me out the most. As of right now, Elons net worth is $360,000 million dollars. He spent $290 Million dollars. Let's just drop the million and imagine you made $360,000 last year and it only cost you $290 dollars to become president. The amount of money this person has is just staggering. He should be taxed 100% at this point.

[–] Fandangalo@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago

Imagine life was a game. You lived for 2025 years. You worked 260 days / year. You made the median US salary.

You would need to relive that process 3,145 times to match an Oligarch.

That amount of wealth is unethical while humanity suffers. No one can really fathom “1b dollars.”

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's income, though, not net worth. Imagine you've got $250k in your 401k and you spent $250.

[–] killabeezio@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago

I get there is a difference, but the 401k thing is not exactly correct either. He can borrow money against his net worth. Yes, while it's not 100% accurate, it's still pennies to him.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 8 points 1 day ago

"No puppet! No Puppet! You’re the puppet!"

[–] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago

This is the correct answer. Musk bribed the election outcome in an unimaginably vicious attack on democracy. Therefore it should be expected that Felon Drink Bleach be beholden to Sieg Heiling Space Karen.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 101 points 1 day ago

Maybe he should appeal to Congress to impeach musk.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 13 points 23 hours ago

Ohno, mom and dad are fighting agian

[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 68 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Du..u..wh...he's the fucking president.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 15 hours ago

president MUSK, should not have to listen to assistant TRUMP.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

False. Putin is president.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 15 hours ago

chairman of several countries.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] libra00@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

Yeah, but 'lying liar lies some more' is not much of a headline, either. :P This really souldn't be surprising media organizations anymore.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 33 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Why is Trump SO UPSET that our President would Want to be Briefed on War Plans?

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 14 hours ago

what would president musk say, about TRUMP'S outburst?

[–] libra00@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Because he said that he wouldn't be in order to establish that he was in control, so when it comes out that he's not (which we all knew anyway) he looks weak and stupid. So he's issuing excuses, only he's a moron so the excuses make him look even less in control. But it's okay, he'll have nappy time in 5 minutes and forget about this and the American media will conveniently forget along with him.

[–] twistypencil@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wait, it's it propaganda, or a leak? It can't be both

[–] Iapar@feddit.org 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Of course it can. War is peace after all.

[–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Weirdly, we are at (trade) war with Eastasia.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 32 points 1 day ago

Two of the biggest egos clashing? I did Nazi that coming.

[–] Jimius@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 day ago

It's not even that he has business in China. He has also stated that Taiwan is part of China and that China-Taiwan tensions could be alleviated if Taiwan gave up some of it's territory to China. He has already chosen to side with the adversary in any future indo-pacific conflict.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

Liquidate Musk

[–] Talaraine@fedia.io 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I mean, Trump can always see to it that Elon falls out a window. He got what he wanted from the guy right?

[–] libra00@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

Trump couldn't arrange a beer run in a goddamned frat house. The reverse is far more likely to be true.

[–] OCATMBBL@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

R voters would somehow blame Bill Gates. Trump is invincible for some goddamn reason.

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

He can just wait for an equine dose of ketamine to liquify Elon’s liver and kidneys. Rest in literal piss.

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This has to be fake. Since when does Trump care about conflicts of interest?

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When the conflicts don't benefit him?

[–] libra00@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

He's on Musk's payroll, conflicts of interest that benefit Musk do benefit Trump, so I think it's rather that he only cares when they make him look bad.