I’m confused isn’t this just for images tho?
this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
438 points (98.9% liked)
News
29216 readers
3517 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
OK so this is meant for revenge porn / stolen photos... but it's written so broadly that it will affect basically any online speech. Great.
it passed. it fucking passed. i don't think people realize what they're about to use this for (or at least they don't fully realize the implications).
load more comments
(4 replies)
load more comments
(4 replies)
Call it what it is: a censorship law. Apparently the climate of fear that makes people self-censor wasn’t enough.
Watch for a LOT of ‘extreme left’ opinions get taken down and their authors imprisoned.
It won't stop with journalists and authors. They'll be looking in Facebook posts, Reddit comments, Twitter threads, Instagram, etc. And random citizens are going to start disappearing.
They'll want people to know it can happen to anyone, not just the most visible or high profile critics.
load more comments
(13 replies)
Another step closer to achieving his Nazi wet dream.
While this is bullshit, we should be able to weaponize it right back at them - any lies the administration spews (which let’s face it, that’s everything) needs to be reported relentlessly.
Make them feel it!
gulf of america?
rumor has it that AOC voted for this
She's part of the problem.
We like to believe she isn't, but she's a proud consumer just like the rest of them.
She will never fight back against the culture of consumption until it becomes cool to do so.
I can eat for literal days, having several pounds of meat, for $15. Meanwhile she feels justified in defending spending $15 on avocado toast and her useful idiots support her because they're part of the problem, too.
All democrats become conservatives when their consumerism is threatened.
She absolutely was a progressive, until that corporate lobby money started hitting her bank account.
Now her bullshit is just performative, like all the rest.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Kompromat
Not a rumor, only 2 house members voted against (both republican).
mfw we can pass a bipartisan spy law no problem but a bipartisan daylight savings law is still too hard.
load more comments
(1 replies)
They all did, it was 409 vs 2, with 22 not voting:
https://clerk.house.gov/evs/2025/roll104.xml
And ironically the only two Nays came from Republicans.
She did. She ‘objected to some of the wording’ but jumped in line like a good little puppet.
censorship is bipartisan, they just want to censor different things
Anyone else hear thunderous applause?
“Flood the zone” benefits both parties when it comes to power grab shit like this. This barely made headlines until it was already passed and it’s too late.
Good news, now we can report all those christians online that won't shut the fuck up!!
I wonder how fast left leaning youtubers will go down.
Oligarchs gonna oligarch.
Isn’t this what the DMCA is for?
Yeah but the DMCA was vaguely reasonable. This is meant to be weaponized.
the DMCA was vaguely reasonable
No it wasn't. It too was MEANT to be weaponized from day one. The difference is that almost all of the people in control of both parties and all mainstream media were in favor, so it got a false veneer of reasonability in coverage.
The DMCA is just as bad as SOPA and PIPA, which was always the intent from the powerful industry groups lobbying for all three bills and the politicians they own.
Meant to be or not, it’s still weaponized.
I think you mean the communications decency act? Most of that has been found to be unconstitutional as will likely be the fate of this bill...
Not with the MAGA Supreme Court on the job.
That's a possibility, but laws like this cut in many directions.
House of Representatives passed the TAKE IT DOWN
I am confused. The title say congress passed the bill while the article says the house is the one that passed it (so congress should be next).
Which is it?
Literally the most basic of basic civics... Depressing.
Congress is our legislators. Our Congress is "bicameral". It is broken down into two houses: the Senate (upper house of Congress), and the House of Representatives (lower house of Congress).
People often use "Congress" as a shorthand for the House of Representatives (but only when they also mention the Senate to make the distinction. Or at least some sort of context making it clear they mean the House).
However, technically, "Congress" includes both houses.
Nobody refers to the Senate alone as "Congress," and if they do, they're doing it wrong and likely causing all sorts of confusion.
how many countries are there in the world these days? cause whatever the number is, that's where we are in education.
Congress is the combination of the House of Representatives and the Senate. America has a bicameral legislature. (Congress=House of Reps + Senate)
Because this passed the Senate in Feb and the House recently it is correct to say that this bill has passed Congress.
The bill has passed both the Senate and House so now the president just has to sign it.
Which he would gladly do. Very sad