this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
1349 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

69156 readers
3444 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blackout@kbin.social 331 points 1 year ago (3 children)

no cost

I think the head of a CEO somewhere just exploded.

[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 303 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Space: The final free tier.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's 1:30AM and you have me cackling like a witch here.

[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Halloween was last week, man!

[–] rostby@lemmy.fmhy.net 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Unlike the free tier.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

and every conservative congresscritter, for some reason. 'couldn't this be done in the private sector'

[–] oce@jlai.lu 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

CEOs are usually not relying as much on taxes. That's why it's free, this is a way to justify tax usage by developing public outreach.

[–] feminalpanda@lemmings.world 7 points 1 year ago

Walmart CEO definitely relies on taxes, food stamps, WIC, and other programs. ISP CEOs took tax money for Internet upgrades and did nothing. Multiple bailouts for business that they squandered on stock buyback.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Chozo@kbin.social 135 points 1 year ago (3 children)

With this being a free service, I feel like calling it NASA+ is a bit misleading. To me, I feel like the "+" indicates a paid, premium service. If it wasn't for the title of this post that clarifies that it's free, I probably wouldn't have even considered installing the app based on the name, alone.

Either way, this is great news! I'm probably gonna check this out once it's available. I wish they'd have a release date, though. The official page just says "Coming soon".

[–] MysticKetchup@lemmy.world 82 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Feels very much like they're just following the trend of a bunch of streaming services that just add a + to the end. As long as it's good though I don't think it matters much

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think Paramount ++good sounds promising

[–] ItsMeSpez@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ItsMeSpez@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Strikes me as tongue-in-cheek.

[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

The release date is November 8th.

[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 year ago

It may mean, NASA content plus other content they feel is appropriate to the service.

I don't usually think "paid service" when I see the plus symbol added to something.

[–] IronpigsWizard@lemmy.world 99 points 1 year ago (11 children)

I posted on Lemmy about needing recommendations for movies to watch on shrooms....and then minutes later stumble across this article.

Talk about perfect timing, lol.

This is really starting to feel like a perfect replacement for that...other website.

[–] sweetviolentblush@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I have a huge list of trippy & visual movies, tons of variety if you're interested in picking through it for ideas: https://letterboxd.com/bee_tea/list/background-movies-for-house-parties

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Monty python and the holy grail and/or life of brian.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Chef_Boyardee@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In my Humboldt opinion, it doesn't matter what I watch as long as I consume enough shrooms. I watched Hot Tub Time Machine the last time. It was great.

[–] Wilshire@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I took too much and had a really bad trip watching "Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs 2"

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 70 points 1 year ago (5 children)

NASA+ will be available on most major platforms via the NASA App on iOS and Android mobile and tablet devices; streaming media players such as, Roku, Apple TV, and Fire TV; and on the web across desktop and mobile devices.

What's the betting it won't be on LG's WebOS though? 😭

[–] 474D@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My deepest sympathies to all 3 of you.

[–] dlpkl@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Lol you joke but that includes every LG OLED tv sold to date

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't most with one have a better box?

[–] LUHG_HANI@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Usually yes, Plex is slow as shit but honestly iPlayer is still fantastic even on a b7 2017 oled.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] epyon22@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 year ago

Who will think of all the palm pre's out there

[–] harry_balzac@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Don't say that... I'm planning on getting an LG

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

Get a streaming stick. The hardware TV manufacturers use to run their OS is generally bottom of the barrel and is sluggish as hell.

[–] appel@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

Their OLED panels are top notch, so don't sleep on it. Just get a separate streaming device as the experience on Roku, Android TV and Apple TV is just miles better.

[–] thanevim@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

As others have said, don't buy TVs for their smart features. Just use a streaming stick. They are easier to replace as software changes, and there's practically no real benefit to ever putting a TV online in the first place.

Also, LG panels are the best visual quality. You're doing good going the LG route. Just keep it offline.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sygheil@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

*Previously on Desperate Spacewives...

Sam has just kicked out of the airlock apartment by his wife Karen. Would his other woman save him from radiation and lack of oxygen? Tune in to this episode of Desperate Spacewives

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago
[–] obinice@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (7 children)

If it's called NASA Plus, how is it free? The "plus" means it goes a step beyond their free content and into a paid tier.

Don't get me wrong this is absolutely fantastic I adore NASA and space, but they're just be some hidden cost? Otherwise it wouldn't be a streaming service called NASA Plus, right?

[–] ChewTiger@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

I don't think everyone sat down and agreed to that being what plus means. It's like labeling food as organic, it means nothing. It's just a name. Odd thing to obsess over, you'll get nowhere trying to understand marketing people, just let it go.

What they are adding is a more condensed experience accessing NASA content and making it easier for casual viewers to access. The more people paying attention to science the better. I think this is a fantastic move from NASA

[–] Sanyanov@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Looks like they refer to adding their Science wing into the streaming, too.

In this crazy capitalist world peiple started forgetting that public services can be free, like, for real :D

[–] DaCrazyJamez@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

*Paid for with taxes, not free.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That goes without saying.

It's free for the end consumer and everyone knows that it is paid with taxes. So saying free is just easier.

[–] shinratdr@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

But the Libertarians always have to say it. Nevermind that anything free from a corporation is paid for though advertising, or selling your data, or folded into the item cost, or future purchases, so by this strict definition that “someone is paying for it” means literally nothing is ever free.

It has to be said EVERY TIME someone mentions that public services are offered at no charge.

[–] csolisr@communities.azkware.net 10 points 1 year ago

If I need to pay taxes anyway, at least I prefer to have the investment returned back to me in some way, and this seems like a nice way to do so.

[–] Patch@feddit.uk 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Jokes on you, I'm not an American so it really is free for me!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dbilitated@aussie.zone 32 points 1 year ago (6 children)

plus just means more I think, they're adding to their service so it's "plus"

just because that's usually a hook to get you to pay more doesn't mean that's now the definition of the word

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're selling our usage data to aliens to pay for server costs

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›