this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
231 points (99.1% liked)

News

29289 readers
3631 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

It is high time to actively suspend the White House. That right is older than your country!

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 51 points 1 day ago (3 children)

If we ever get back power from these Nazis they need to spend the rest of their lives in a dark hole.

[–] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 2 points 33 minutes ago

You take power back. They're not going to just give it.

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 29 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Or, hear me out, we bring back firing squads for treasonous traitors.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 21 points 23 hours ago (6 children)

If Trump somehow loses the next election they need to throw the entire book at him, then write a new book and throw that at him as well. We also need to add a few more amendments to the constitution to prevent this shit from happening again. Maybe eliminate political parties? Not sure exactly how to fix this but it's blatantly broken right now.

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

What are you talking about? He got SCOTUS to say everything he does as president is legal, remember? He’ll never do time for anything.

[–] mjhelto@lemm.ee 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Ok, so hear me out, if he doesn't care about the rule of law, why should we?

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Because it’s what makes us better than him.

Criminals don’t care about the rule of law. Does that mean we civilians should just execute shoplifters in the streets without trial or due process?

[–] tal@lemmy.today 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

then write a new book and throw that at him as well.

No, the Constitution prohibits ex post facto laws. A law you are punished for must be on the books before the crime you commit that it prohibits is committed.

The federal government is prohibited from doing so:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_One_of_the_United_States_Constitution#Section_9:_Limits_on_Federal_power

No Bill of attainder or Ex post facto law shall be passed.

And state governments:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_One_of_the_United_States_Constitution#Section_10:_Limits_on_the_States

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 25 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

He lost this election. They just used every single method possible to squeak out the smallest of possible wins.

https://sdvoice.info/trump-lost-vote-suppression-won-here-are-the-numbers/

https://youtu.be/UgIay64Obcs

https://youtu.be/t-yr-Mgkhm0

https://electiontruthalliance.org/eta

First and last links are the data. The middle links are for us stupid people that need to be told how to read the data in the last link.

[–] LogicalFallacy@lemm.ee 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks for telling me to use the middle links

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Now do the three shells, am I right? ;-)

[–] LogicalFallacy@lemm.ee 2 points 13 hours ago

Thanks a lot you shit-brained, fuck-faced, ball breaking, duck fucking pain in the ass

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 19 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Executive orders have to go. This is just ridiculous at this point how they are being used.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Some limits on pardoning would be great too.

[–] mrnarwall@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

He is ineligible for the next one. Don't ever forget that

[–] BBQuicktime@thelemmy.club 4 points 10 hours ago

You know damn good and well he's going to try to get a third/permanent term. Supreme Court basically gave him free reign to do whatever he wants now, so at this point I'm rooting for the Mickey D's to finally finish the job.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

The problem is who's going to stop him? He already said he's planning to run for a third term. Track record isn't looking great, he seems to have figured out that if he just does things and ignores the law nobody stops him.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 17 hours ago

Maybe eliminate political parties?

So, direct government like the Swiss ? (Ie it's totally possible)

[–] jwt@programming.dev 4 points 16 hours ago
[–] Tower@lemm.ee 13 points 20 hours ago

Steve Vladeck has a great substack article explaining this. The paid version goes into a more detail, but even the free portion gives a great explainer about just how fucking wrong Steven Miller is.

https://www.stevevladeck.com/p/148-suspending-habeas-corpus

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks BBC for auto-fucking-playing the video and not allowing me to pause or mute it.

At the very least you can mute the tab