this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
465 points (99.2% liked)

News

36618 readers
2562 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A bombshell report from The New York Times suggests that despite her title, Attorney General Pam Bondi is hardly running the show at the Department of Justice.

According to the Times, Bondi “sees her role as that of a surrogate, a faithful executor and high-volume messenger, compelled to cede ground to empowered players in the West Wing.”

“The decisions are being made at the White House, and then they’re being pushed down to the Department of Justice, which is very, very atypical,” observed DOJ alum Elizabeth Oyer. “It feels like she is just performing a part. She is like an actor, in a way.”

all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Chozo@fedia.io 86 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well of course. Trump doesn't trust women, but he likes having them around as tokens to flaunt. I doubt any women under his admin are allowed any actual amount of power or control over their own departments.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Maybe Noem. She's proven herself to be a sociopath, and that's his kind of people.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Even she has that Pakled Homan to do the real dirty work. She just cosplays for photo ops.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 6 points 10 months ago

...she shot and killed her puppy because she didn't feel like training it. She's definitely a sociopath.

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 73 points 10 months ago

This is how you get past the problem of Senate confirmation hearings when the person you want to appoint is so horrible that the process could expose things like how they're less of a Nazi sympathizer and more of an actual Nazi.

Similarly, Trump's team has repeatedly denied that Elon Musk was the head of DOGE in order to reduce the amount of congressional oversight that he receives.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 43 points 10 months ago
[–] mriswith@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, this is why they've been spamming social media(including lemmy) with the whole "Kakistocracy" thing recently.

They really want you to think the idiots are in charge, that way you don't try to dig deeper as the idiots chop off everything they see and some parts they're told. Just look at the Librarian of Congress thing. People were making jokes about librarians, meanwhile she was basically in charge of defining DMCA and digital copyright.

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago

Am I surprised a Stasi looking pedophile is in charge? Nope.

Am I surprised a bottle blonde Barbie bobblehead is a token figurehead? Nope.

[–] Kurious84@eviltoast.org 20 points 10 months ago (3 children)

The guy even looks like a henchman. Wtf.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

He's 100% the image of the violent overseer that cracks his whip across the backs of slaves with a smug sickly sneer on his ugly face in a movie. The one that everyone cheers for when his victims get their justice against him, slashing him with his own whip a dozen times before choking him out with it. Let us hope he receives his deserved comeuppance in real life as well.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago

Stephen "PeeWee Himmler" Miller

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

hes also the guy that DYED his scalp to make it look like he has a youthful amount of hair.

[–] RagingSnarkasm@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

She's too busy delivering 747s from her "former" bosses to her "current" boss to be bothered with much else.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

OBVIOUSLY, she was the conduit for this entire deal. Qatar had already paid her a fortune for her lobbying services, she would have been the first phone call they made to set up the deal.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 18 points 10 months ago (2 children)

“It was clear from the start that Mr. Miller, who is not a lawyer, would exercise control inside the department, current and former Trump aides said,” observed the Gray Lady.

Who the fuck is Gray Lady?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 14 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Thanks. Seems like a pretty obscure reference to just include naked in the article like that.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

It's not obscure, it's an old, well-known nickname, you just hadn't heard it before.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] ssladam@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Eh. It's always been a part of discourse. If they instead said, "our view of the administration's workings don't even rise to the level of observing shadows projected on a cave wall, we are truly in the dark", I'm betting you would go right along with it, even though there are plenty of people that wouldn't get the reference.

This just happens to be one you didn't know ... And now you do.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 10 months ago

I think you're replying to the wrong comment lol

Unlike the person I replied to, I knew that the NYT is called The Gray Lady already, though admittedly I didn't know WHY, so I looked that up.

I'm 42 and would put good money on most other people familiar with the nickname being a generation or two older than me, making it a pretty niche reference to casually expect the wider readership to understand without having to stop reading to look it up..

[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 months ago

Mayor of Bowerstone

[–] forwhomthecattolls@sh.itjust.works 18 points 10 months ago

"bombshell!! Trump slammed by liberal party!!" bombshell my fucking nuts, when are y'all going to actually do something about it though? I'm so fucking tired of these stupid "bombshell" and "liberals slam" headlines while the media plays softball with this admin as if they aren't burning the nation to the ground.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And the Heritage Foundation controls Stephen Miller

[–] LMurch@thelemmy.club 5 points 10 months ago

They are running the Project 2025 playbook right? Makes sense that Heritage Foundation is the QB. We fucked up.

[–] modifier@lemmy.ca 11 points 10 months ago

I could read a similar report for almost any cabinet post, or more likely multiple cabinet posts, and I wouldn’t bat an eye. I would almost assume this is happening in most cases to some degree.

Most of these secretaries are picked for their willingness and ability to absorb what passes for tough questions in congressional hearings while the real power like Hobgoblin here make the decisions.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 5 points 10 months ago
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Duh? You don't think a Fox News host is actually running the DOD either right? Or Naomi DHS?

This has been transparent from the start.

[–] Uranus_Hz@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

Been transparent that this is how the GOP governs since they had an actor with dementia play “President” in the 80s.

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

All these Germans

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network -2 points 10 months ago

Blondi, bombshell. I like it.