this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
181 points (99.5% liked)

Television

997 readers
617 users here now

Welcome to Television

This community is for discussion of anything related to television or streaming.

Other Communities


Other Television Communities

:

A community for discussion of anything related to Television via broadcast or streaming.

Rules:

  1. Be respectful and courteous to all members.

  2. Avoid offensive or discriminatory remarks.

  3. Avoid spamming or promoting unrelated products/services.

  4. Avoid personal attacks or engaging in heated arguments.

  5. Do not engage in any form of illegal activity or promote illegal content.

  6. Please mask any and all spoilers with spoiler tags. ****

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Will they return the design to what it was before the rebrand too? I want episodes in a grid, not in a line that I have to horizontal scroll. And I want the random episode button back (j/k don't need it since I ripped my Adventure Time blu-rays, get fucked Zaslav)

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

"Warner Bros. Discoverv CEO David Zaslav's 2024 Pay Rises to S51.9 Million"

Earning every penny. This is why we norms can't be CEOs.

https://www.thewrap.com/david-zaslav-2024-pay-warner-bros-discovery/

[–] oyo@lemm.ee 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Continuing the slow death of the HBO brand by tainting and conflating it with discovery garbage

[–] golli@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago

Agreed. Max wasn't a good naming choice, but taking out the HBO part to protect the brand value of it standing for prestige television was the right call. And honestly Max wasn't great, but imo not as bad as i first thought when they introduced it, just really bland. I guess going with something that includes the Warner brand in the name wasn't on the table after the merger?

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 22 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Haha after making their logo closer to HBO. Such boneheads to ever remove HBO from the name to begin with

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 27 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

The fact the HBO is a brand dating back decades, and they abandoned it for a generic Max was the true stupidity.

[–] filcuk@lemmy.zip 9 points 5 hours ago

They wanted to feel the success of the twitter rebrand first-hand

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

My thoughts exactly

[–] Psaldorn@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Corporate brain rot on full display.

Everyone knew it was asinine, and now they've finally confirmed it.

Everyone involved should be fired and bonuses clawed back if the board had a spine.

Or maybe it's just some BCG consultant bullshit where they deliberately tank a company to short the stock or whatever. Hard to believe it's real people making such awful decisions..

[–] MiraculousMM@hexbear.net 3 points 3 hours ago

I thought it was already called HBO Max lol

[–] dephyre@lemmy.world 62 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (5 children)
  • HBO Go
  • HBO Now
  • HBO Max
  • Max
  • HBO Max
[–] FuCensorship@lemmy.today 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

GO NOW MAX!...... Max...... MAAAX!

He was in fact gone

[–] dephyre@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

dun dun dun dun dun DUN DUN DUN DUN DUN!

[–] Shawdow194@fedia.io 36 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

2027: Go HBO

2029: HBO Maxnow

2033: Home Box Office: Max Streaming Service

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Wait, HBO stands for Home Box Office? They've had a perfect name for streaming this whole time! Lol

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Back in the days when cable/satellite was new and they were bringing you unedited movies from the theater, before they even were released on VHS often. Of course there weren’t thousands of viewers using this as a way to increase their VHS collection for one low monthly fee by recording the channel…

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

It's HBO-b'in time

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

And for a brief moment an idle Wednesday morning in 2028: "HBgod damn it l voice recognition turned on"

[–] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

2040: Still Not Netflix

[–] invertedspear@lemm.ee 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Go and now were separate products from Max. They required you to have a cable/satellite service with HVO add on in order to log in.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure we had HBO Now with no TV service for the last season or two of GoT

[–] greybeard@lemmy.one 1 points 2 hours ago

As I recall, Go was the add-on to TV service, and Now was the standalone. Although the names were kinda dumb, it was good that they had two different names.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

There was an HBO Nordic around the time of HBO Go

[–] realcaseyrollins@narwhal.city 2 points 6 hours ago

HBO Go Max Now

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 48 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Are we full circle yet? Can’t remember…

[–] Uli@sopuli.xyz 18 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Next year, they will start a loyalty program where they ship cardboard boxes to anyone who wants to ship things out of their home. This will coincide with their rebranding to "Home Box Office."

[–] gex@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

In a couple of years they'll transition their service to a 24/7 linear stream of HBO content delivered through a dedicated data collection (satellite or copper wire, depending on your location) directly to your TV

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 27 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

At this point they're just doing this for the free advertising.

On a related note, in Brazil HBO tried to argue that Max was actually a different company that HBO Max so it could raise prices of costumers that had already locked in contractual prices. Not sure how that ended.

[–] chase_what_matters@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago

Why would they do that specifically to people who make and supply costumes??

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 9 points 6 hours ago

Same app. New-ish name.

No this is not "new-ish", this is old.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 hours ago

I told them "Max" was a dumb name, but did they listen?

They did not.

[–] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Fucking god HBO.

[–] illi@lemm.ee 15 points 7 hours ago

Innovation, 2025 edition

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

The name isn’t the problem.

Example: in their app on Roku tv, some shows list their episodes left to right, while others right to left.

Sometimes I have a “continue watching” option at the top, while other times I have to sort through 12 categories of suggested shows before getting to it.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

I mean, Roku sucks both from a user and developer standpoint so it makes sense to me that it's less maintained

[–] harsh3466@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 hours ago
[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 8 points 7 hours ago
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I'd love to have all the money these companies spend doing these silly name changes.

This one probably isn't a big expense, but when Verison took over from the previous company they had to repaint hundreds of trucks and redo signs on dozens of buildings.

[–] cheers_queers@lemm.ee 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Tbf that was probably cheaper than buying all new right?

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 6 hours ago

Before they pulled the payphones out of the local terminal, it was like an archeological site. The phones' coin boxes would be inscribed with the name of the company that owned them. I remember Bell Telephone, Bell Atlantic, Nynex, and Verizon phones. Tehre were probably a few iterations I've forgotten.

Another tale I like is that they took giant steel sign off the top of the then Pan Am building and replaced it with Met Life. That's another change that cost someone a few bucks.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Can they partner with Apple TV Channels again, now? It was nice back then. Five years ago :sweat:

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Guess this makes sense. They've removed most of the discovery content from Max and now expecting customers to maintain two subscriptions.

[–] st3ph3n@midwest.social 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

lol. That garbage was why I canceled Max in the first place.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I know a lot of people did, but I was previously a discovery+ sub and happy to migrate from it. My partner got all her trashy reality shows she enjoys, I got HBO and Adult Swim shows for one price. I'll likely lose out on HBO now or just temporarily sub when content I want to watch drops. Sucks for me.

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 3 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I thought it was already HBO Max?

[–] simple@lemm.ee 6 points 6 hours ago

They changed it to Max despite everyone telling them it's a bad idea, and now they've finally realized it was a bad idea.

[–] st3ph3n@midwest.social 5 points 6 hours ago

It was. Then it became just 'Max' a couple of years ago.