this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
346 points (93.5% liked)

Technology

82799 readers
6243 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gressen@lemm.ee 268 points 10 months ago (3 children)

The printer company is called Procolored.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 93 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Also it’s for a UV printer, not an inkjet or laser printer, with the cheapest option on their website being $1900 and the average being around $6000. So, not a regular printer you would buy off the shelf. It’s still bad of course, but only so many people even could be impacted by it.

[–] HiTekRedNek@lemm.ee 28 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Except you don't need to have bought one to be affected by it. Maybe your employer bought one, and infected a computer you use at work.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 10 months ago

That’s possible, but they aren’t really typical office printers either, it’s for specialized art printing. Again it’s definitely bad, this just isn’t typical office equipment.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's almost worse. Because then you'll be more inclined to trust them.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 10 months ago

Yeah, I would expect a printer I paid 6k for to not have malware!

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

I'd have guessed HP

[–] underline960@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[–] ouch@lemmy.world 146 points 10 months ago

Can you please add the company name in the title? If you want to keep original title, you can do it like this:

This printer company [Procolored]

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 93 points 10 months ago (3 children)
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 27 points 10 months ago

In that case it wouldn’t be news.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 months ago

Btw, germany has a law about "Computersabotage". Wondering why HP & co still can make your paid (computer) hardware not working anymore?

[–] HyperfocusSurfer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 10 months ago

Good to see there are still viruses in the wild, I was beginning to think those kinda became some ancient forgotten form of art. [I mean proper viruses, not malware in general]

[–] baggins@lemmy.ca 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The fact they're still trying to blame "Chinese language" after presumably being provided with receipts?

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think they meant they were using malware detection tools that would often flag it because of the Chinese language issue and just assumed that's what was up when it flagged it this time.

Kinda like the boy who cried wolf, they ignored it when there really was a wolf.

[–] baggins@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You're telling me there are malware detection tools that hit on the Chinese language? Like anything from China is malicious?

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I'm just saying that's how I interpreted that bit. They thought it was a false positive because of that. For all I know, the earlier ones might have also been real malware or maybe it was all made up.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Looks like the printer company did not have antivirus on their systems.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

It was a false positive.

Edit: I can't believe this needed a /s

[–] muusemuuse@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

No this is an example where sarcasm and stupidity can't be distinguished via text alone.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Would have thought it was an obvious play on the headline, but I accept that sheer stupidity does exist.

[–] NotAnotherLemmyUser@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish 2 points 10 months ago

Mobile wikipedia on computers looks nice

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 months ago

Yeah unfortunately

[–] keegomatic@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

No, it’s obvious to anyone with a brain. If the commenter seriously thought it might have been a false positive when they read the original comment, they never would have relayed their thought the way they did in their reply, and it is so clearly a reference to the content of the post that to analyze it even that deeply is overkill. To anyone reading this who is a native English speaker: if you think that comment needs a “/s”, you need to work on your reading comprehension. Read things more carefully.

[–] serenissi@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Why would anyone use the software? Aren't modern printers plug and play?

[–] Chewget@lemm.ee 21 points 10 months ago

Plug and auto install drivers and play

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

This is not a typical home or office printer, very specialized.