this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
442 points (95.9% liked)

Greentext

6258 readers
1800 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 20 points 11 hours ago

Wokeness is what keeps them in the air, which is why they're falling out of it now

[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 27 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

This person's grasp of physics is like halfway there. Like one more module and they'd calm the fuck down.

[–] ne0n@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

‘flying for no reason’

‘ignoring gravity’

‘somehow joints don’t break’

Halfway might be overstating it

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

"A little knowledge" has never been more dangerous.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 25 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I think large planes "look" like they can't work because their "relative speed" is really low


that is, their speed relative to their length. We're used to seeing birds cover tens of lengths per second, whereas a large airliner covers ~1ish per second at takeoff.

Or not, but this always seemed like a plausible explanation as to why planes look impossible. (Though given that hovering birds don't look funny, maybe this is a silly observation...).

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 hours ago

Though given that hovering birds don't look funny, maybe this is a silly observation...

Birds flying against the wind and staying in the same spot as a result do look kinda weird though. Especially if you are not aware/don't notice there is mstrong winds

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 13 hours ago

That's a really thoughtful take, I'm glad you shared. I think it has merit. I think proximity is a factor too. The public rarely gets up close to a jet, but I can attest from personal experience they seem much faster when you're closer during takeoff and landing.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 17 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

My faith in humanity is so low that I 100% believe there are planes are not real truthers that's out there.

[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Well, I mean, those flat earth idiots clearly have never flown, so I wouldn't be surprised if their digging down attitude would include planes. They already think the moon landing is fake, don't they?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 2 hours ago

Actually that's something I don't understand, they think the moon is a sphere about 100 miles across about 1000 miles above the flat Earth. Why couldn't humans have flown that short distance?

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 52 points 21 hours ago

Be human.

Have billions of tons of atmosphere directly above you

Don't explode

Make it make sense

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 35 points 20 hours ago

i remember when i thought these jokes were funny. now i know tons of people actually think like this and it's depressing rather than funny.

[–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 47 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

It's not pressure under the wings, it's fucking Bernoulli sucking on top of them.

(So, yes, sure, it is gay, but it's not fake.)

[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Actually, I studied aviation in university. It's literally just magic.

[–] Salamand@lemmy.today 3 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

But then how can they fly upside down?

[–] Rin@lemm.ee 1 points 23 minutes ago

A fighter jet is basically a fancy dart, and darts dgaf about gravity

[–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 7 hours ago

Flaps. (As in, the hinged bits at the back edge of the wings, that essentially change the shape of the wing as required, not by flapping the wings; that'd be an ornithopter, as in Dune, not a plane.)

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 4 points 14 hours ago

Because air doesn't give a fuck about gravity

[–] redhorsejacket@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When you nut, but Bernoulli keep sucking...

"goofy plane"

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago

I'm 100% convinced this was never a battle of airframes and manufacturers and simply was down to: "No, sir/ma'am, I will not fly the derpy plane into combat. Can't do it. YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND THE REST OF THE PILOTS WILL LAUGH AT ME"

[–] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 154 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This perfectly encapsulates how anti vaxxers and others think. "Ive thought it through and it cantnbebright". Its incredible how we can have access to vast amounts of information and yet live in an age of gleeful ignorance.

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 66 points 1 day ago (3 children)

>Town of 100 people
>Everyone has $50
>Everyone stores Money In Town Bank
>Total bank balance of everyone: $5000
>Bank lends $1000 to a farmer to buy new equipment
>Merchant who sold the equipment deposits $1000 into bank.
>There is now $6000 total deposited in the bank
>1000 just came out of thin air
Money is fake and gay

[–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I remember this classic philosophical quandary of our time, but in a different form.

Classic.

[–] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 6 points 4 hours ago
  1. A and B add 20 to Box. Both have -20 balance.
  2. A sells Box to B for 30. A has 10 balance and B has -50.
  3. A walks away with 10 Profit
  4. B takes cash out of box (40). Made 10 Loss.
[–] pm_me_your_thoughts@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

debt: am I am joke to you?

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 3 points 15 hours ago

Balance:

Each of 98 Townspeople: $50

The Merchant: $1050

The Farmer: -$950

So, the 98 towns people and the merchant all wants to withdraw.

???

Now you have a riot outside of a bank.

Congrats, you destroyed a Town with #Banking 🫠

Or alternatively.

The Banker just gaslight the town to mob-lynch the Farmer the good ol' capitalism way.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago

Future economists are going to make so much fun of us for thinking $1000 was created here.

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Next time you see a plane imaging two hooks in the middle of the wings, a crane lifting up the plane with these two hooks and shaking it.

This give you a good approximation of what the forces in the plane are, and once you picture that you might think that there is no way the plane can hold up in this situation. Yet it does.

It's more like putting the plane in a bowl of jello and then shaking the bowl.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 90 points 1 day ago (22 children)

Also weird how giant steel tankers float on the ocean. Especially when they're weighed down by all that cargo. It's practically unbelievable. I throw a tiny rock in the ocean, and it sinks...but not those giant steel boats? /s

[–] tja@sh.itjust.works 51 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No, ocean water can't sink steel boats

[–] lostme@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

It's a well known fact that steel weighs the same as feathers

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 47 points 1 day ago

The funniest thing is that the aerospace engineers who made this possible are just as much hopeless dysfunctional wrecks as the rest of us.

[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 12 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

...fake and gay

Hey now. Let's not blame gay people for the common-sense-defying demon-wizard sorcery that engineers get up to when someone threatens to take away their calculators and caffeine.

[–] Gustephan@lemmy.world 21 points 21 hours ago

Bruh some of the earliest planes were literally called biplanes. The gay has been complicit in aviation demon magic since the very beginning.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 2 points 15 hours ago

G.I.N.A.S.F.S.

[–] Aliktren@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Glue, is how the wings stay on, really good glue

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 35 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Well I must admit, when the plane is resting on the ground, the wings droop down a lot. Then when airborne it's the other way around, the wings curve upwards as the fuselage hangs from them. In my mind nothing that big made of metal should be able to flex that much.

But since I'm not a conspiracy theorist, I have learned about material science, airplane design and engineering. And I have found out that it does indeed flex that much. It also isn't that thick, since it's only a skeleton wrapped with a very thin layer of metal. In fact if it didn't flex as much, it would be weaker and not stronger.

So the thing I really learnt is never to trust intuition when it comes to things like this.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 29 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I remember a quote from an A380 pilot saying the plane doesn't look like it should be able to fly.

Even the people that fly them know they don't look like a flying object.

load more comments (5 replies)

Don't forget about the screens they put in the windows

load more comments
view more: next ›