News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
With my (admittedly limited) understanding of the topic, extracting the water from ocean water is a relatively simple process.
The problem is what do you do with the brine afterwards. The process featured in the article makes it harder for the brine to clog the system, which is admittedly an important step. But you can’t put the brine back into the ocean without risking killing local wildlife.
And I’m not under the impression that there are any practical uses for brine, at least not at that scale.
Would it be posible to salinate the waste water that goes back to the ocean from treatment plants?
I think the problem is that it's too salinated and needs to be put back into the ocean slowly over a wide area.
Maybe have ocean voyaging ships (e.g. container ships) do controlled release of brine through their journey?
Though probably no way of achieving this via current economic and legal systems. Even if attempted today, ships would probably be incentivized to dump the entire payload the moment they cross into internal waters.
I've always wondered why we can't contain the brine and pack it into abandoned salt mines for long-term storage. It would probably inspire some maintenance on abandoned salt mines and prevent cave-ins.
Clump it into a big ball and send to space!
Big box with pipe pointing up in the middle that exits the box through the bottom to reach a collection tank
Fill with salt water without going past the pipe opening
Add transparent lid with a slope towards the middle so the water condenses and drops in the pipe
Go do whatever you want all day, you've got a passive drinking water creator and nothing to clog since solids just accumulate at the bottom and can be scooped out as needed.
Scooped out and put where?
Most of it is salt, I know many places where they would gladly buy it for winter road maintenance.
Bet Nestle shuts this shit down somehow…
Edit: damn I can’t spell for shit
Small question (perhaps dumb on my part as I haven't slept yet), do these desalination system remove other chemicals such as PFAS, arsenic, lead? I think I read that they use nanofiltration membranes to remove almost everything. How about molecules that are smaller than water (H₂O)? Do they get filtered?
Depends if they also evaporate.
Most molecules aren't smaller than water, however filters that are small enough to only let water through clog pretty quickly. That said, most heavy metals and salts won't evaporate in a decent still (which is good, because atoms and ions are often smaller than water). I'm not sure about PFAS and microplastics, but I expect they don't evaporate.
Yeah, no. It won't be cheaper than tap water. The amount of energy required for desalination, clogging or no, is an additional cost on top of what you need to do to get water drinkable with non salinated water. So no matter the energy source, this cost has to be factored in and that will automatically make it more expensive. No free lunches in physics.
You are ignoring that saltwater is available in many, many more places than freshwater. Building a local efficient desalination plant can absolutely be more cost-efficient than transporting freshwater for hundreds of kilometres. Don't simplify so much you lose all perspective.
I am not ignoring that, it is also vastly more contaminated than fresh water with microplastics and all the other grabage shipping companies and countries have been dumping into it for the better part of a century now.
I'm not saying it is impossible to do or not a potentially sensible option in certain places, I am saying it is not going to be cheaper than tap water anywhere.
This system uses a variant of distillation to desalination the water. This means that a good part of the filtration and purification process required to make most fresh water potable would no longer be necessary, so it could be cheaper than regular tap water, especially in places where the starting water just isn't that great to begin with. It also is solar powered and looks like it could be pretty scalable, so it may be a viable option.
I’m not saying it is impossible to do or not a potentially sensible option in certain places, I am saying it is not going to be cheaper than tap water anywhere.
How does this work? If it's a sensible option in certain places (those without access to tap water), how can tap water be cheaper? Why wouldn't everybody just bring tap water to those places as well if it was cheaper?
It might still be more expensive but more resilient to other external factors such as embargoes, wars, whatever might influence delivery of other water sources. Cost isn't the only factor to decide what technology or solution should be implemented.
It is usually the driving factor in our global economy.
I don't see how your point makes sense - transport can easily make tap water more expensive than salt water, but you're acting like it's literally impossible for transportation costs to be higher than desalination costs. Why?
It won’t be cheaper than tap water.
Wait a few years.
My presumption is that the desalinated water might be cheaper than tap, but would still require further processing to be considered potable, which would raise the price on par or above conventionally sourced tap water. I imagine there’s a lot of costal areas though with ready access to saltwater and minimal access to freshwater where it’s worthwhile.
Truly the most reposted link in lemmy history
Cheaper than tap but at a 500% markup for CoNvEnIeNcE! You know that if it's cheap, the large black scarf buckets (c*pitalists) will come in and force the prices to go up until nobody can afford it.
Something like this, I'd bet! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ejvvou7d-kg
That guy was annoying as hell.
With the 2fps photo transitions and verbally saying “thirsty af” I had to quit
It is the same thing.
Yet somehow makes me less interested than the article.