zero_spelled_with_an_ecks

joined 1 year ago

Is this because the FTC does fuck all to curb them so people know it's useless?

[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Double sweet.

I used to love the books as a kid and got to experience them again thanks to some android apps. Never know there was something like this, though.

If this is Gowrong, I don't want to be Goright.

It's not the label that makes something a graph. Including tables and charts that are data but do not show a relationship into the things that support your conclusions is incorrect. You claimed to have a preponderance of evidence where what you had was one incorrectly interpreted graph. Do you understand why I called you out on that?

[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev -2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So one singular graph?

multiple graphs

Maybe you got some other things wrong, too.

[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev -2 points 1 week ago (4 children)

If you can't even count, I don't see a reason to listen to anything else you have to say on intelligent. There are two graphs in the paper you cited, the one that I've posted in another comment (figure 1) and a pie chart of prostitution regimes in appendix C. The former shows some places have the substitution effect overshadow the scale effect and it some places the opposite occurs. The latter is a pie chart that doesn't have a dependent variable.

[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev -2 points 1 week ago (6 children)

No, we've been over this, it does not show a direct increase. Average is the word they used. If you keep repeating the same wrong thing, it doesn't suddenly become correct.

[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev -3 points 1 week ago (8 children)

If we're using your source, you should be for legalizing prostitution in some places such as the USA because it reduces trafficking. Tell me again, which of us has the agenda?

[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev -2 points 1 week ago (10 children)

No, it doesn't make it ok because somebody else does it or that the blame should be on the party that did it first. That's an argument a five year old might think is clever; nobody here thinks it is. You have an opportunity to learn here. Will you take it or will you continue to blame others for your poor behavior?

[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev -2 points 1 week ago (12 children)

They already said it's derogatory. It's like if somebody called you on idiot. The denotation would be that your intelligence is lacking. The connotation would be that you're a lesser person for it and cause issues for those around you. In the same way, whore and prostitute have to some denotation but different connotations with the former having the negative connotation. Is that simple enough for you to understand now?

 

I'm not talking about the consumption of animals here, to be clear. What I'm talking about is spending days and a bunch of money planning to kill something, doing the killing, and skinning/eviscerating what was killed, and often displaying the stuffed corpse. Hunters and fishers refuse to admit they're obsessed with taking pleasure in killing something.

Miss me with the "tradition" stuff, it's just peer pressure from the dead and a fallacious argument. Don't tell me it's to eat, like I said, I'm not talking about the consumption here, so please prove to me you are literate by not bringing up that point. And don't tell me you're respectful to the animals you kill; I don't believe the planning, stalking, and killing is a good way to show respect.

 

My tools serve me, not the other way around. It's not worth the time and effort to wash by hand or sharpen on a whetstone. I don't need an expensive knife to cook at home. A pull through sharpener and honing steel are adequate. Get the right material and you don't have to worry about the metal in the dishwasher.

view more: next ›