this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
86 points (96.7% liked)

Ask Lemmy

32953 readers
2250 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

None. I believe everything. Especially the contradictory parts. It's one of the powers granted to me by my true nature, revealed through the one true Slackmaster, J.R. "Bob" Dobbs.

When a lot of people who have nothing to do with each other say the same thing.

When people who dedicate their life to this one thing say the same.

When I can come to the same conclusion based on the reasoning behind it

When it is repeatable.

Then I going to accept it as a fact otherwise it is just something someone has said.

[–] remon@ani.social 2 points 1 week ago

At least 400 kilobyte.

[–] hogmomma@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If we're talking about things that are easily quantifiable, not very much at all.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What would you classify as easily quantifiable?

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Things that don't very much over time, like your height.

[–] hogmomma@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I don't know, like measurements of something. Quantities of something. Distance, speed, volume.

yeah that makes sense, like a math proof

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I read proper peer reviewed research. I'm usually not a specialist on the subject, so I am unable to properly process any data available.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Depends how interesting or important or complex the thing is. If you tell me that your foot is 25cm long, I'll believe you without question. If you tell me it's 52cm, then you're going to have a hard time convincing me (unless you've already convinced me that you're a talking kangaroo).

This is why it's much more important to be skeptical of people's views on political issues too, because the situations are always complex, and important to different people in different ways.

I'll colloquially use the word "fact" for extremely well supported claims, but in my head the only actual "facts" are mathematical derivations. Evidence supports the veracity of a claim, and a claim with a lot of evidence gets a tentative place in my world model, but any of those claims can be refuted by sufficient counter-evidence

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

At least 4.

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Like with questions posted in a forum: at least, having little more to read than just its title ;)

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (5 children)

What elaboration do you require from the title to allow you to answer the question fully?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] the_grass_trainer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Depending on the fact I should be able to find sources for it on .ORG and .GOV sites.

If i just find random blog posts, or facebook groups in the search results I take it with a grain of salt.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Logical proof, is it reasonable and do peers agree. That could be a tiny amount of data or a large amount of data. It is specific to the "something".

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›