this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2025
122 points (95.5% liked)

Progressive Politics

2846 readers
860 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump has filled his administration with sycophantic loyalists instead of highly competent and experienced people. Anyone else worried about this? Why did Republicans in congress confirm them?

top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] breecher@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago

He would never appoint anyone who wasn't a sycophant, and a qualified person would never be a Trump-sycophant. He also likes to feel like the smartest person in the room, which means that there really have to be some incredibly stupid people in that room.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 hours ago

Why did Democrats confirm them?

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

He likes sycophants. That's the most important thing for him.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago

They are very much qualified. But their qualification is not related to whatever position they have.

Their sole qualification is that Trump considers them loyal to him.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

It’s disturbing, but I’m much more concerned with the CIA assets being installed at every level of government. They are a much more dangerous and more long-term threat.

[–] Xande@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

They have no problem pulling down his diapers and with kissing his shit covered ass... I guess.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No one else wants to work with him.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 19 hours ago

And he hates having people questioning him, especially when smarter than trump

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 75 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't be so glib. That's almost 1,000 pages of finely detailed plans, hardly digestible in an evening.

[–] Bongles@lemmy.zip 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 5 points 13 hours ago

Wow thats am amazing resource

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

It's almost like a qualified and effective government isn't his priority.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Serious answer: Because they're sycophants. People call Trump all kinds of names, but the only thing that truly matters is that he's the poster boy for Narcissistic Personality Disorder. I invite you all to have a read and get your head around the subject. It explains every single thing about Trump. (Aside from the obvious dementia that's set in the past 4 years or so.)

To Trump's mind, anyone who says he's a great man, is automatically smart and qualified. He had a few great picks first time around, but they crossed him one way or the other and were suddenly dumb and unqualified.

If you've never been around a hardcore narcissist, the idea of such a person is truly hard to comprehend. Everyone throws that word around willy nilly, but it's a diagnosis, with meaning and criteria. For example, people often point out his lies. Obvious, right? But in his mind, he can't lie. His brain will rearrange contrary facts to mean that someone else was wrong. Back to your question, he requires unquestioning sycophants to satisfy his "never wrong" mentality. Anyone calling him out causes brief cognitive dissonance, and that's poison to most of us, really hurts, but it's shear hell for a narcissist. For a minute anyway. :)

As to the confirmations, plenty of Republican lawmakers tanked their careers by so much as seeming to go against Trump, in even the smallest ways. They now have two choices: Ride the tiger they created and hope they can still have some influence, or, defy him and have no influence.

I can expand on that all night long, but that's the bones of the story.

[–] vala@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

This is probably the most reasonable non-consipiracy based explanation.

[–] Wazowski@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

Standard dictator bullshit, fucking obviously.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 10 points 1 day ago

Because sycophancy is the only quality he requires.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why did Republicans in congress confirm them?

A better question is...why did so many Democrats confirm them, as well?

[–] TBi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As the saying goes "Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake". Better these idiots than anyone competent who could cause real damage intentionally.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

That’s a great way of looking at it. I’m not sure if it was that or simple cowardice, but I like your interpretation.

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

Gee, I dunno.... maybe corruption?

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Uh it was on purpose. You’re rightly concerned about the first point (their competence) with less focus on the second (their ability to lock his nuts). His priorities were the opposite.

And that is why you, my dear internet stranger, have already proven yourself to be a better Presidential candidate than the asshat we got.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm not sure why this is so hard to get across everywhere on the internet...

THE.

CRUELTY.

IS.

THE.

POINT.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Because he is the smartest and best, and he wants it to stay that way

[–] liverbe@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Republicans believe that government doesn't work and they are intent on proving that it doesn't. 🤔

[–] 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 1 day ago

The same reason foreign policy is currently dependent on his personal relationship with foreign leaders. The show's all about him in his mind.

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

Because, for them, burning it down is the point.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Because they want a christofascist state, and rhats part of the plan to remake the country in that image.

[–] harsh3466@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

The answer is in the question. They're sycophants.

And yes. Lots of us are worried about this.

[–] shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] liverbe@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

TIL thanks!

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Because he's a moron and only likes people who suck up to his greasy ass. They're all using him, knowing how he operates. You could probably get anything you wanted out of him by just treating him like royalty. Shit, get a lefty who can stomach through it, and we might be able to get him to step the fuck down. It would be way too hard not to assault the bastard, tho...

[–] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It matters if the boss is an idiot but if most people in an organisation are competent it can limp forward. Probably won't achieve much of lasting value. These type of populist regimes tend to evaporate as quickly as they arrived.

[–] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

Anyone with a billimetre of brain power would not work for such a brainless ignorant fuck like rump.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The more the government sucks, the less people will rely on it, or expect it to function well. A weak, hobbled government is great for the rich and powerful, but not so great for you and me.

Donakd only cares about loyalty. Actual competence and intelligence can be a liability.

[–] OneSpectra@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not a good idea having incompetent cult members in positions of power.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 1 points 1 day ago

No it is not. Additionally, placing loyalty above ability is a sign of both narcissism and insecurity.

[–] rhvg@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

The first generation is always incompetent as the founders of a new regime want to reward the backers and have loyalists to take up the power. The next generations might get better. You have the same in the Soviet Union and China; the first generation of bureaucrats were soldiers having no idea how to govern, but their successors learned fast and ruled more effectively.

I don’t like Trump, and I hope their regime ends ASAP, but the truth is if it continues, it might get better at governing over time. JD Vance or Don Jr. will have a better grasp of the system and suppress their political enemies more effectively. We might hate them more, but will be even more powerless to fight back than today.

[–] danielsan256@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

Internet Explorer is that you?

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

You know why.