If you're not going to use the features of Scale that Core not has, i'd suggest you'd pick Core. Perfomance wise it's better in almost all the basic Truenas tasks, untill you try to utilize the more advanced features/plugins.
this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)
Homelab
371 readers
3 users here now
Rules
- Be Civil.
- Post about your homelab, discussion of your homelab, questions you may have, or general discussion about transition your skill from the homelab to the workplace.
- No memes or potato images.
- We love detailed homelab builds, especially network diagrams!
- Report any posts that you feel should be brought to our attention.
- Please no shitposting or blogspam.
- No Referral Linking.
- Keep piracy discussion off of this community
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
After playing with Kubernetes on TrueNAS SCALE for a while, I also recommend against using it. It's incredibly unstable, doesn't support standard deployment functions (e.g. Helm) out of the box, and the slightest mistake with stopping/starting services will cause the Kube API to break. Much better to run a Docker swarm or spin your own k8s cluster with something like kubespray.
Just install truenas scale on bare metal. Then side install proxmox on it (since scale is just Debian). You can have zfs having direct access to the disks and have VMs, LXC or Containers running on it.