this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2025
79 points (98.8% liked)

Gaming

3760 readers
120 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:


If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Stillwater@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Then we won't be playing it

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 11 points 1 month ago

Yup, easy way to get me to put away my wallet

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 22 points 1 month ago

I don't buy EA games anyway lol

[–] suzucappo@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I very much believe there are some underhanded deals going on with these gaming companies and Microsoft to intentionally not allow them to function on Linux at release or sabatoge (looking at you EA WRC) games after they have been released in an attempt to force people back onto Windows.

[–] lorty@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do you really think Microsoft has to make any deals like that when they have 97% market share?

[–] suzucappo@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

No, but I think they do it anyway as a preemptive tactic to reduce the share of users on Linux as much as possible.

Every time there is a small wave of users that transition to Linux it means less market share for Microsoft. The more users that get on Linux and have a pleasant experience and things just work means a better reputation and word of mouth spreading between people which translates into a greater potential for even more people to make the switch.

Things like this start slow but once they start to gain traction it can turn into a much bigger problem for Microsoft and they know that. So it would essentially be them trying to "nip it in the bud" before it becomes something that they are too far behind on to get control of.

[–] belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org 15 points 1 month ago

And it will remain unsupported from my wallet as well

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago

Looks like the wallet stays in the pocket.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Irrelevant. The only relevant bit of info is that it’s an EA game which automatically is a no-go.

[–] recklessengagement@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Why the hell does a skating game need kernel-level anticheat

[–] ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago

Remember cheat codes?

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why do linux games not support anti-cheat?

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It depends on the anti cheat. Many anti cheats for Windows require kernel level access. That doesn't fly on Linux. But again, it depends on which one, some work just fine on Linux.

[–] shadowedcross@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Also, the same anti-cheat can work with one game, and not the other, because it's up to the publisher/developer to enable Linux support for anti-cheat that can work with Linux. For example, one of the most well known solutions, EAC, has a bunch of games that don't work, and actually a bunch that do as well.

[–] CptBread@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But IIRC the ones that allow Linux is basically crippling the anti cheat on the system. Apex Legends used to allow Linux but then stopped when too many cheaters started playing on Linux because it was easier to cheat there.

[–] Tanoh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Eh, you could make your own kernel module and require it being enabled for Linux as well. It would be a major undertaking though, and since the linux share is very small still it just isn't worth it.

[–] lorty@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Devs don't want the work to support it because linux is a very small part of the market.