this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2025
330 points (98.0% liked)

PC Gaming

11792 readers
867 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

Incredible that they got over 1 million signatures, and this shooting target gets just as much of a say.

[–] hunnybubny@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] waterproof@sh.itjust.works 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Ironically, I think Ubisoft has a good example of a multiplayer game with a good end-of-life despite not reaching its sales expectations with BattleCore Arena, where the last update allowed P2P play after the servers went down. Meaning that the game wasn't totally killed off, even if it was thought as yet another service game, which is always appreciated.

That said, given the lack of marketing that was done around the game, it was perhaps a "not too expensive game that could maybe work on a fluke", where Ubisoft's lack of attention potentially left the devs quite free with their game. Devs who thankfully respected their players and made good end-of-life decisions.

[–] dafta@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 4 hours ago

The whole reason Stop Killing Games exists is because of Ubisoft, because they killed off The Crew.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 19 hours ago

Why tf should anyone play the games if the CEO looks like some old rich white greedy parasite? Fuck him and Ubisoft. I was already boycotting their cookie cutter, external launcher, account needed, crashing, microtransaction bullshit enshitification anyways.

[–] nthavoc@lemmy.today 19 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Greedy old man attempting to persuade other ignorant old men in whatever body of government that somehow videos games are finite and expire when we clearly have original Pacman and Pong arcade cabinets still in existence and completely functional. That whole "we can only provide service for so long" is a bullshit argument. I hope the EU puts him and other assholes like him in their place. "Woe is me" dev excuses are getting really old.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Your unwarranted sexism here is weird, gross, and unnecessary. The EU parliament is not perfectly 50/50 but it’s not that far off.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Imagine speaking up for a parasite 🤡

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The EU parliament is a parasite?

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 38 minutes ago

Full of them, yes, useless regime whores working on 🔛 half of the owner class

May luigi bless all of them

[–] nthavoc@lemmy.today -1 points 3 hours ago

Cool. Wasn't ripping on women or anything. You do you!

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It's fair to say they can't support games forever. But in that case make games that don't need support forever or provide the software to run the games for free after some time.

[–] nthavoc@lemmy.today 4 points 8 hours ago

I agree. I don't expect companies to perpetually support these games. When they feel like no more money is to be made, then they should release it from lock down or release the server software and let someone else host it. Used to be a time where mod tools and dedicated servers were released with the game and whole new games were made. Counter Strike and Team Fortress are examples of this.

[–] rustyfish@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago

Guillemot told shareholders that Ubisoft works hard to ensure games stay playable, saying the company offers “a lot of support” and services to keep games accessible “24/7.” However, he stated that “support can’t last forever.”

Ah, the same BS again and again.

Little real life hack:

  • Someone says that.

  • Say: That’s not what it’s about.

  • Leave them standing and refuse to talk to them like they refuse to understand or act like they don’t understand what SKG is about.

Think about it. They either don’t understand it but still expect to be taken seriously or they actively try to hurt the movement and don’t argue in good faith. So why bother?

[–] ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And then we kill Ubisoft. Murder by no purchases.

[–] Nevrome@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We wish but they'll never go away. Die hard fans and whales are going to buy the games no matter what plus all the microtransactions included.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 19 hours ago

Just make a trend of making fun of losers that play Ubisoft games.

[–] ugo@feddit.it 30 points 1 day ago

Wait what? Ubisoft “customers should get used to not owning games” ubisoft? That ubisoft? Color me shocked.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 42 points 1 day ago

I don't care what this guy has to say. I'm not even going to click on that link because it'll just make me angry. Fuck off, Yves. Get your own house in order.

[–] kubica@fedia.io 85 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Finally seeing them complaining, it was weird that they were so quiet.

[–] jjagaimo@sh.itjust.works 56 points 1 day ago

Thry didnt want to give it attention, but now that its gained some traction and may cause something to actually happen, its a problem for them

[–] donuts@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You call that complaining? It was a bunch of vague non-answers meant to not really directly answer any of the shareholder questions

[–] fckreddit@lemmy.ml 100 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh, I am not surprised about that. Ubisoft were never really known for respecting their customers.

[–] VitabytesDev@feddit.nl 2 points 2 hours ago

Username checks out

[–] Gork@sopuli.xyz 65 points 1 day ago (4 children)

During the last sale recently I was looking for an open world racing sim. Ended up getting Forza Horizons 5 over Ubisoft's The Crew 2 because they killed off and removed my copy of The Crew from my library, so they can get fucked.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Idk if Microsoft Studios is the better choice here lol

[–] drcobaltjedi@programming.dev 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

All the old delisted forza horizon games are still playable. Can't say that about the crew.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 6 points 1 day ago

Sure but Microsoft are active participants in genocide

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] 0xtero@beehaw.org 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

He should probably concentrate making games people want to play instead. Ubisoft is down the drain.

The Stop Killing Games demands are not hard to meet, unless you’re a greedy little shitgoblin.

[–] Isoprenoid@programming.dev 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

https://www.google.com/finance/quote/UBI:EPA?window=5Y

You're right, they aren't doing so well looking at this 5 year window.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's about stock market tho, a entirely different kind of game.

[–] accideath@feddit.org 2 points 11 hours ago

Yea but if people aren’t buying your games because they’re shit, shareholders aren’t gonna be happy about it. And Ubisoft hasn’t made a breakout hit in a while. Their normal is „tolerable if you get it on sale, if you don’t care about the franchise“, and even shareholders notice that.

[–] masterbaexunn@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wasn't their driving game a big factor in the campaign in the first place? Guy's out of touch to say the least

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 47 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The ceo is a massive clown!

[–] RedSnt@feddit.dk 45 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah, Ubisoft almost went bankrupt not that long ago. It was only with a $1.3 billion dollar infusion by Tencent they survived. Leadership barely know that the point of the company is to make games.

[–] arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Truly so shocked. Anyway, pretty obvious since the biggest reason these companies refuse to even release the server component (as opposed to making the game playable offline) is that they can then either "remaster" the game and release it again in like a decade or just release it again with maybe a couple features added and call it v2.0.

[–] whelk@retrolemmy.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"And now, available for a limited time from within the Disney vault!"

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They were really selling VHS cassettes as the definitive format you would keep and treasure for the rest of your life.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 1 hour ago

Yeah and now I own them all. I did not pay for a single one as VHS is treated as trash most of the time. Don't play them just have them sitting in a closet due to their stupid giant plastic boxes that become brittle and crunchy when exposed to sunlight (kinda like the corporate ghouls that made them).

[–] ren@reddthat.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nintendo is doing exactly that (pulling games from stores, letting them die). Now that they have more invasive DRM in their latest console, they might even take a more active approach like Ubisoft wegen it comes to live service games. Let's just "sunset" Mario kart world live service and brick it in a couple of years?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago

Goat fights back against banning-goats-from-gardener-jobs.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

He's so old. No wonder Ubisoft is so close to bankrupcy.

load more comments
view more: next ›