What is so different between QBR and passer rating that Brock Purdy's stats can have THAT big of a gap?
NFL
A place for NFL news, game highlights and everything that excites you about American Football.
One game sample size truly is the only evidence we need…..
QBR hates Russ
You have too much time on your hands
QBR is worthless. Why do people give it so much attention? This just proves how stupid of a "stat" that it is.
QBR was effectively ESPN seeing what PFF does and saying “I want that” and assigning an unpaid intern to come up with the calculation.
It's literally just sample size. QBR isn't that great anyway...
ESPN once had a two INT Charlie Batch game as its best game under QBR. Then they went back and fixed their model.
We have to rescue sports from analytics
O’Boyle rules!
we're winning the fucking super bowl you pieces of shit
the math ain't mathing
Am I still wrong if I inexplicably think Tim Boyle is better than Josh Allen
Is it inexplicable if you have QBR stats to explain it?
Wait, what?
Isn’t QBR specifically designed to devalue certain plays (like Allen’s end of half INT)?
How did he end up with such a bad QBR?
Per QBR, Charlie Batch had the best game ever, when he threw for 186 yards and two interceptions.
This is why the only people who care about QBR are dak Prescott truthers
I don't really understand this one but I still think QBR is a great comprehensive stat. Smaller samples are more subject to weird stuff of course.
In this particular case, I think every Tim Boyle play was meaningless due to the team being down by multiple touchdowns, so his QBR stayed close to baseline?