How is AI not buried under piles of lawsuits?
this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
474 points (95.2% liked)
Technology
73792 readers
3473 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Because its not a legal entity. And when it becomes one... well lets just hope it never becomes one.
Musk offered to father her children. This was probably done deliberately.
Musk offered to father her children
What an insane thing to have happened
Yes, but Musk makes inappropriate offers to impregnate women regularly, so this isn't surprising.
Worth noting he has to pay these women lifetime contracts to father his children, many of these women were ex employees at his companies.
Cool motive. Still gross.
Actually, not cool motive. The man is a eugenics supporter and is trying to fill the world with his genes.
load more comments
(1 replies)
The difference between impregnating and being the father figure. He's such a piece of shit.
I appreciate Grok for being the platonic ideal AI system. Not like these others that get little guardrails and tweaks added every time a news article hits about some inevitable fucked up output it can produce. Just pure unrefined donkey shit. 🤌
Grok has guardrails, it's just they're there for different reasons.
Oh it's refined donkey shit alright, it has guardrails just like any commercial LLM.
load more comments
(5 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
The image generator will also make photorealistic pictures of children upon request, but thankfully refuses to animate them inappropriately, despite the “spicy” option still being available. You can still select it, but in all my tests, it just added generic movement.
So it does know theres a line to cross somewhere…
Reminder that Elon Musk told people on Reddit, that he will set the Age of Consent to 14 on Mars, if not lower.
Isn't that a bit too high? 14 Mars years are about 28 Earth years.
...
Not that I think Elon knows that.
You really don't think there's a 'freedom' version being mailed to the Epstein mailing list?
load more comments
(1 replies)
There’s definitely models that have no problem with that yeah
Gross.
Sometime make it do this to Trump so that we can summon a lawsuit ouroboros
You may not have noticed there was a nude AI deepfake of Trump that's been viewed tens of millions of times, aired on Comedy Central.
That’s satire though.
Under any reasonable court (big caveat for American courts right now) that’s free speech.
load more comments
(21 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(5 replies)
I wonder if grok could make some distasteful Elon deepfakes.
everyday I thank myself for being too shut-in to post pictures of myself online
load more comments
(27 replies)
https://archive.is/QTpGe because its either pay walled or needs an account
load more comments
(2 replies)
Swift could easily get a lawsuit set up against them and most likely win, if AI nudes start getting made and sent out by average people. If she did, she's already won the court of public perception or whatever it's called ( drawing a blank ) because of how popular she is. I guarantee if she told people not to use grok or ex-twitter, a large of the swifties on the platform would run faster than Usain Bolt to delete their accounts.
Swift could easily get a lawsuit set up against them and most likely win
How would that work? If someone drew a photorealistic painting of pretty much the same, under what legal claim could Swift "most likely win"?
Many jurisdictions have started banning nonconsensual intimate imagery, including the US (in several states as well as federally under the TAKE IT DOWN Act).
load more comments
(5 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
At what point do these artists (read labels) start suing for defamation (read loss of profits).
That picture is uncanny.
So everyone is naked and without job. What would be next AI revelation ?
view more: next ›