this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2025
167 points (91.1% liked)

Books

6730 readers
39 users here now

A community for all things related to Books.

Rules

  1. Be Nice. No personal attacks or hate speech.
  2. No spam. All posts should be related to books.
  3. No self promotion.

Official Bingo Posts:

Related Communities

Community icon by IconsBox (from freepik.com)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Wrapped up the first book after much struggle. Am I crazy for finding it extremely poorly written? Writing aside, the characters suck, the motivations suck, and the scenario building feels like it was tossed together by a 12 year old. I don't get the hype. Everything is paper thin. The fictional science aspect is the most compelling part but as a cohesive whole it fails to land.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sagan_Wept@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The three body problem is the ONLY SciFi series to repeatedly blow my mind. I read a lot of scifi, it's always the same stuff.

[–] Lazhward@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I read a lot of scifi, it's always the same stuff.

As someone who enjoys sci-fi this sounds like a very odd statement from someone who reads a lot of it. I wouldn't say I've read that much sci-fi but I could quite easily name some books that could hardly be any more different. Sci-fi seems incredibly diverse to me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 months ago (4 children)

It happens sometimes.

I really enjoyed the movie Arrival, so I picked up the story collection it’s based on. My, what a load of genre fiction in the worst possible meaning of the word.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I tried to read the book but good God it was so bad and so boring it took me months to get about halfway, then the show came out and I was like 'yes! Maybe this will give me motivation!' and I couldn't be bothered to finish that either.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

exact same here. I've even tried reading it like three times

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Getting6409@piefed.ee 4 points 2 months ago

I definitely found many, maybe even most of the characters bordering on comically corny. But i hadn't read anything like it regarding the core stories and concepts, and those got the hooks in me. Maybe for a bit i was holding my nose to keep moving through the story, but at some point i just didnt care and had to read all three books, and in the end they're still a dear favorite. If the underlying story isn't doing it for you, you're only crazy if you force yourself to keep reading it.

[–] JokeDeity@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

Haven't read it, but the show was interesting enough for me to watch the entire season.

[–] MisterCurtis@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Yeah. I struggled with the cringy romance sections. Very much a freshman entry. But the series as a whole does work well. The Dark Forest is huge improvement. it also had a different translator and has a different structure that I feel works better than the first.

[–] PlasticExistence@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I understand this community is about books, but I’m curious if anyone here who read this book also watched the Netflix series?

If so, do you hold a different opinion of the show?

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The Netflix series felt very different then the book. I found the mystery aspect in the first part of the book the most interesting, but the show completely skipped it. So the show wasn't bad but I was still disappointed.

[–] PlasticExistence@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah I can understand that. I liked Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings movies a lot, but there were some big differences between them and the books that I wished had been different. Tom Bombadil, for instance.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I liked the Chinese tv adaptation, didn't read the book, and won't watch the American version. I think the series was good largely because of the actors, not so much the plot.

[–] mr_satan@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Now that you mention it, yes. The characters are quite 2 dimensional and unlikeable (not all, but definitely important to mention).

That being said I thoroughly enjoyed the books and didn't stop too much on the characters. Under unlikeable, flat, awkward characters there was an interesting premise and good thinking to be had: living in a society that has no private thoughts; dark forest theory, life in a society after the end.
So what I did was take a big sip of suspension of disbelief and enjoyed the ride. The interest to see the conclusion of the story was enough to coast through all three of the books.

Also, I read those just before the hype. I first heard of the first book a few years before from an Adam Savage podcast and the premise stuck to me. So after reading the Witcher I wanted something sci-fi'ish and this hit the spot.

[–] UnrepentantAlgebra@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I agree that the underlying ideas were interesting, but the books had so much padding. So much of the story was just "but wait, it gets worse" that I found it hard to get through at times. I feel like the books could have been half as long and still conveyed the same interesting concepts without losing much.

[–] truthfultemporarily@feddit.org 2 points 2 months ago

I believe its the authors first book. It gets significantly better.

[–] MaddestMax@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I was very happy to stumble upon this post. I’ve been struggling through The Dark Forest for what feels like forever. I’m usually a pretty voracious reader, but this series is like quicksand to me. It’s really really boring. I just keep hoping it will get interesting. It threatens to…and then starts sucking again. I never DNF books, but I’m so SO tempted here. Glad there are others out there!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›