Any plans to support the revised ruleset?
Dungeons and Dragons
A community for discussion of all things Dungeons and Dragons! This is the catch all community for anything relating to Dungeons and Dragons, though we encourage you to see out our Networked Communities listed below!
/c/DnD Network Communities
- Dungeons and Dragons - Art
- DM Academy
- Dungeons and Dragons - Homebrew
- Dungeons and Dragons - Memes and Comics
- Dungeons and Dragons - AI
- Dungeons and Dragons - Looking for Group
Other DnD and related Communities to follow*
- Tabletop Miniatures
- RPG @lemmy.ml
- TTRPGs @lemmy.blahaj.zone
- Battlemaps
- Map Making
- Fantasy e.g. books stories, etc.
- Worldbuilding @ lemmy.world
- Worldbuilding @ lemmy.ml
- OSR
- OSR @lemm.ee
- Clacksmith
- RPG greentext
- Tyranny of Dragons
- DnD @lemmy.ca
- DnD Memes@kbin.social
DnD/RPG Podcasts
*Please Follow the rules of these individual communities, not all of them are strictly DnD related, but may be of interest to DnD Fans
Rules (Subject to Change)
- Be a Decent Human Being
- Credit OC content (self or otherwise)
- Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article
Format: [Source Name] Article Title
- Posts must have something to do with Dungeons and Dragons
- No Piracy, this includes links to torrent sites, hosted content, streaming content, etc. Please see this post for details
- Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.
- No NSFW content
- Abide by the rules of lemmy.world
I’d give it six minutes before hasbro’d kick down your door. Only recommended for renters
There are multiple other sites that have printable 2024 spell cards.
Should all be covered by the open source license as far as I understand and I link to the license. Fingers crossed they stay chill...
They're not actually that bad, are they? WotC tried to go bonkers in the beginning of 2023 and about this kind of stuff. They tried to change their OGL rules but but the fans beat them into submission, to some extent at least. WotC released an SRD placing a lot of their stuff under Creative Commons CC-BY-4.0 licensing. I'm not a lawyer, but I think spell cards would be fine as long as they avoid the things (like Forgotten Realms) that are excluded from the SRD.
I'm sure someone more versed in the topic will correct me if I'm wrong.
It’s mostly the intended absence of safety that leads to jokes like mine. Hasbro stated that they’d prefer a closed system and that the trap can shut when they desire it. The dnd community at large, myself included, has made hasbro out to be the money-hungry monster it is. Often in gest, but with an underlying understanding that there can no longer be long term trust.
TLDR, you’re probably fine, but the hyperbole is there for a reason
Valid. They are after all trying to claw back the rights to The Deck of Many Things and Orb of Dragonkind by trying to copyright them despite explicitly including them in the SRD 5.1 under an irrevocable Creative Commons license, or were as of a few months ago.
I'm out of the loop.
Are we allowed to say Beholder now?
Hmm, I think that I would rather face a beholder while wearing nothing but a loincloth armed only with a rubber spatula than read through that whole thing to figure it out.
I have considered it, but have not found a dataset to use. If you know of one I would be very interrested.
Looks great. It looks like some of these card fill over to the second side. Is that just based on the length of the spell description?
Yeah, if it does not fit on one card, i add follow up card. When I was building it I was like it's find to have a "back" card. But some spells get pretty long.... I formatted it all manually by splitting the description.
Good idea. Sounds like a lot of work
Yeah, it did take a bit of manual work. Hope it can benefit others.
Thank you :D
Looks great! What languages / frameworks did you use for this?
Thank you. It’s written in Typescript using React and Nextjs. It’s a pretty simple solution kept the spells in a json file, so there is not even a database for the main logic.
Any reason half of my spells are missing?
- Green-Flame Blade
- Mind Sliver
- Sword Burst
- Armor of Agathys
- Silvery Barbs
- Shadow of Moil
...
Also Hexblade Subclass
Well looks like it's a mix of reasons.
Firstly, many of your spells seem to be from the revised e5 2024 edition, where as the website currently only supports the e5 legacy spells. Secondly, two of the spells you mention where apparently just missing from the source data set I used. I have added Mind Sliver and Armor of Agathys
Ah nice, thank you. This will be great for my next session, I'll just build the few missing myself
Looks like you are playing a mix of the 2024 e5 edition and Tasha's Cauldron of Everything, whitch might explain the discrepency.
Hexblade Subclass is not part of the base e5 Legacy rule book I used to add the subclasses.
The project is open source, so feel free to make a PR with additions or create an issue to request changes: https://github.com/adamlamaa/dnd-spells