this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

NFL

111 readers
2 users here now

A place for NFL news, game highlights and everything that excites you about American Football.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
communick@nfl.community
rglullis
1
Which team would be worse off by losing a specific player. (alien.top)
submitted 2 years ago by 2022survivor@alien.top to c/nfl@nfl.community
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Settle a Thanksgiving question for me folks. Which team will be worse off. Miami losing Hill or 49ers losing CMC.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chocolateskittlez@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Besides every team and their QB. Its the Browns and Myles Garrett.

[–] Categothic@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

I am just so glad Myles Garrett plays for the Cleveland browns

[–] space_raccoon_@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Browns without Myles Garrett

[–] Genetalia69@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

This current Chiefs roster without Mahomes would not be pretty.

[–] DerMeisterMC@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

I think it would be beautiful and would love to see that. Non-injury absence of course.

[–] devastitis@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Chiefs could be 0-10 without Mahomes. Never seen so many dropped passes before, even from Kelce.

[–] reno2mahesendejo@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

I'm surprised the defense has looked so strong (especially against the Eagles) without Nick Bolton. He seems like the non-Mahomes MVP of that team at times

[–] Ihateredditalot88@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Yep. Bills without Allen too.

[–] albundy66@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Texans losing CJ Stroud

[–] Toomuchlychee_@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Jets losing Aaron Rodgers

[–] devastitis@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

It’s so funny seeing how many primetime games the Jets play, and being reminded each time that Rodgers only lasted four plays.

[–] itsgucci060@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Miami

[–] AutomateAway@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Broncos losing Justin Simmons would pretty much put a huge hamper on their resurgence

[–] Alevnitsuj@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Dolphins losing Hill. They only got one other guy that’s a REAL threat at WR.

9ers have shown they can get away with throwing whoever out there in the run game and do well. Maybe not as well as with CMC. But good enough to still win games WAD.

[–] Thighs4Guys@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I know he’s not even that great, but if we lost Sam and Jacoby played, we’d be 1-11 right now

[–] devastitis@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Which would be better than them winning meaningless games for a team that clearly needs to rebuild.

[–] reno2mahesendejo@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Anytime Lane Johnson goes down, the Eagles change dramatically. The run game stutters, and the passing game loses all of its pop as Hurts (or whoever) can't rely on the protection holding up (or being able to get out of the pocket cleanly). It's blatant at times just how wide of a gap there is between him and Driscoll, or really any other right tackle in the league.

[–] Agingerstolemysoull@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

This is a dumb question, every team with any player of a starting caliber

[–] Meadows14@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Miami losing Hill would be catastrophic.

We've seen the 49ers perform at a high level without CMC before, we haven't seen Tua be a top-level QB for sustained periods without Hill.

[–] Bipedal-Moose@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

San Francisco was a top 10, perhaps borderline top 5 offense already when they had no McCaffrey and it was Jimmy G, Aiyuk, Samuel, Kittle, and Williams leading the offense.

Miami was nowhere close to what they are now without Hill. The answer is definitely Hill.