Dark business. Why are the Brits so happy to just sit back and let this happen.
this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
201 points (98.6% liked)
Privacy
39869 readers
651 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
am british. its infuriating. a mass of the uninformed voting against the self interest for over a decade at this point.
“Torys fucking the country? Better vote for them again!”
Because we're becoming increasingly like the US, where half of the country (or at least those who actually turn out to vote) are hellbent on voting for a party that doesn't give a single shit about their needs, just as long as they drivel out some racist shit now and again.
As @breadsmasher said, “Torys fucking the country? Better vote for them again!”
Hopefully Reform split the brainless idiot vote in cause chaos.
Thing is: I really, really, really do want voting reform but... I don't think I can bring myself to support Nigel Fárage.
They still have their monarchy
The recent article about kids getting arrested for words and it's positive reception should give you a hint.
Most of the country are change hating small c conservatives who genuinely believe the state knows best and is totally trustworthy. They get their news from the Daily Mail or The Sun because Britain is the best country ever. Its the mindset that ensures we still have a class system, a monarchy and brexit.
The good news: Police are wearing body cams that they can't turn off.
The bad news: It's because the cameras are using constant facial recognition to tag everyone.
Where is the footage stored? As I am conscious it often goes missing in the US for problematic cases.
How are they tagging everyone though? Where's this database they're comparing against?
If this is like any other government project it won't work, it will cost 10 million pounds, and is developed by a company that previously specialized in the manufacture of plastic cutlery.
10 million pounds
Hahahaha. Gonna need a few more zeros there, bud.
specialized in the manufacture of plastic cutlery
But no actual experience in the manufacture of plastic cutlery.
The Met are already using it - just not (yet) on bodycams.
The company behind it, who supply the data are called Facewatch. I'm not going to link to their site but they're the ones supplying the tech and db. They did it by scraping social media sites as well as government documents and the plan is to add the UK Passport db data soon.
Where's this database they're comparing against?
Microsoft has had facial tagging and tracking software in the wild for at least a decade. It can also accurately estimate your age, race, gender, and even your mood. I'm guessing they'll probably be using that database overlaid with a criminal wanted list.
Yo, Britonians: Shits on fire. Do something.
Context from the article.
Each of the forces using the K-series cameras told i and Liberty Investigates that they do not, and never have, used the LFR function
Yes, it's cklearly something that we need to keep an eye on.
Sure they haven't. 🤦♂️
I commend your optimism/open mind, I've just seen the abuse by anyone in a position of authority too many times.
And I mean any authority, middle management at companies, etc. Many people struggle to resist using whatever power they have (myself included).
I think enabling the functionality would require too much back-office and vendor integration to make it a feasible lie. Too many people would know about it - and the risks from lying and saying 'not enabled' are too great.
If they had been enabled - and found out - the recommended lie would be "we are currently undertaking a small-scale trial of the technology to assess it's effectveness. We will be report on the results early next year as part of a wider public consultation into it's wider deployment". (Why yes, I have worked in public sector comms).
Or it means they're not using that specific function, but are still gathering data and training the AI or something.
Where can I buy one of these cameras?
Rishi Sunak, 10 Downing St London UK
He also had some oil drilling licenses for sale.
Rishi Sunak, 10 Downing St London UK
I was being serious ;)
Ah...
GCHQ Cheltenham, Hubble Rd, Cheltenham, GL51 0EX
Seriously, you're full of shit.
The second "Cheltenham" isn't nessecary, just the street address and postcode is fine.
Am I full of shit for putting down GCHQ, or for copy-pasting their address and not realising they'd added a second "Cheltenham" to it for no reason?
How terrible China is in mass surveillance. After all, this is a dictatorship in China and Russia and surveillance of everyone.