this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2025
1300 points (90.2% liked)

Science Memes

16895 readers
1721 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sepi@piefed.social 1 points 6 days ago

Mr Brainworms

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 247 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Tylenol is a brand. Acetominophen was created in 1878 (or 1852, depending on who you ask).

e: That doesn't make RFKJr not wrong and insane, in case it needed saying.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 76 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Over half of Americans read at a 6th-grade level or lower and our President speaks at a 4th-grade level. How many you suppose know Tylenol and acetaminophen are the same thing?

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Just wait till they hear what big pharma is doing with paracetamol

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 35 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Wasn’t ibuprofen what they were blaming? Or did they switch to acetaminophen?

Edit: just saw the Trump clip, now it’s acetaminophen’s fault, lmao. Funny how it’s something that’s actually safe to take for pain during pregnancy, because of course they can never pass up a chance at making women suffer

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

They don't care about women's suffering, but I think this is a case where it's incompetence rather than malice.

What's extra crazy about this is that one thing we do know, for certain, can be damaging to a fetus is for the mother to have a fever. Acetaminophen reduces fevers. This is yet another case of an anti-vaxx nutjob thinking the cure is worse than the disease.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] meowmeowbeanz@sopuli.xyz 159 points 1 week ago (5 children)

puts on logic glasses

Oh look, another brilliant mind discovered that autism was identified before Tylenol existed, so obviously Tylenol can't cause autism. That's like saying cancer existed before radiation therapy, therefore radiation can't cause cancer. Peak necessity/sufficiency confusion right here - apparently conditions can only have one cause and medical recognition equals temporal origin.

But hey, let's ignore that Swedish study of 2.5 million kids that found zero causal link when they actually controlled for confounding variables using sibling comparisons. Or those other high-quality studies that show the association completely disappears once you account for genetics and family environment. Who needs actual science when you have timeline gotchas?

Meanwhile pregnant women might avoid the safest pain reliever available because some politician decided to manufacture outrage for political points. But at least someone gets to feel intellectually superior about their logical fallacy meme.

🐱

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

Meanwhile pregnant women might avoid the safest pain reliever available

More importantly, the safest fever-reducer available. Fevers are actually known to be damaging to fetuses, unlike acetaminophen.

[–] rustydomino@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (6 children)

You’re not wrong. But my guess is that “autism predates Tylenol” is probably gonna convince more people than “large controlled study done by the Swiss”. People are generally really ignorant

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

Hmm, i don't like your tone, but you are correct. ASD has a heritability greater than 80% which is higher than blood pressure and the same as human height. It's a genetic disorder.

Also, when was it necessary to differentiate ASD from schizophrenia? The age of onset of schizophrenia is around 18-21 and autism is present practically from birth (apparent 1-3 years). I think OP is wrongly interpreting the Kraepelinian dichotomy which is about bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 91 points 1 week ago (14 children)

Paracetamol was first made in the 1800's though.

Or are they just blaming a certain brand?

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 68 points 1 week ago

Direct from Wikipedia

Paracetamol was first made in 1878 by Harmon Northrop Morse or possibly in 1852 by Charles Frédéric Gerhardt.

The left has misinformation too. Science is on our side; there’s no reason to propagate this shit.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 38 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

It's a brand thing, obviously.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] blackbrook@mander.xyz 73 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Listen I know the RFK claim is nonsense but that doesn't excuse faulty logic. This is like saying cancer existed before X so X can't be a carcinogen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 71 points 1 week ago (11 children)

Not to defend RFK, but this argument is dumb.

People from everywhere it doesn't natively grow developed cancer long before they had access to tobacco. That doesn't prove tobacco use doesn't cause cancer, it just means it isn't the only potential cause.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Also dumb because it wasn't until 1943 that we had the first diagnosis of autism. OP is just making shit up.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] YoiksAndAway@piefed.zip 50 points 1 week ago

Careful! Cancer was around before cigarettes or dioxin. Not that I don't think RFK is full of shit, but sometimes it's best to ignore bad arguments when there are so many good ones to be made.

[–] 58008@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There's a 100% correlation between a child coming into direct physical contact with their family doctor and that same child later being diagnosed with autism. Show me an example where this was not the case. Family doctors are sporing autismomes like a tickled mushroom and no one is talking about it.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 16 points 1 week ago

Not true! YOU just talked about it.

And now I am taking about it... holy shit, it's spreading!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Just because something already exists, doesn't mean it can't be also caused by something else. Like canser. It already exists. But smoking can cause it too.

Next to that, it's paracetamol. It predates the discovery/naming of autism. It's already proven not to be the cause by other studies. Of course these studies could have been wrong, but I highly doubt that.

So this statement is incorrect. Doesn't change the fact that I don't believe a word of either Trump or RFK. I still believe science and I still don't believe pseudoscience.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] omgitsaheadcrab@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Tylenol is just a paracetamol brand name in the US. TIL

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That settles it, then. Obviously, autism was caused by time travel.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 week ago (13 children)

There is some data to suggest there may be a link.

However. The data is very limited. Mt sinai did a meta of 46 studies and found a link (not necessarily causal). A Swedish population study of like 2.5 million children found no link. Etc.

The modest increase that could exist is unclear and confounded. Is it Tylenol or is something that the Tylenol is being taken for? Eg if the mom is having frequent headaches or fevers is the underlying condition impacting development and making it look like Tylenol does?

But why?

Two big answers:

Kenvue (Tylenol manufacturer) is not exactly a “pharmaceutical giant”. They’re a much easier target for rfk to go after with much less in terms of resources. They absolutely will sue though and appear to be preparing to do so though. But going after vaccines (his big target), especially stuff like Covid vaccines, means going after real pharmaceutical giants. Moderna, Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson, etc. deeeeeep pockets and serious legal teams. This may be a fight he feels he can “win” to start gaining momentum and precedent.

IMO the bigger reason is political capital. He has a large following of desperate parents that want an answer for why their child has autism or intellectual disability. I know a lot of people on here are like “autism is a superpower” and that’s great but these people are stuck in the disability mindset. It’s also important to remember that autism is a broad spectrum. Some of these parents have children that are nonverbal, that can’t toilet or shower independently, that get extremely violent when frustrated, that need 24/7 assistance and will never live independently. Of course some of them are just frustrated that their otherwise fine kid isn’t “normal” enough but that’s a whole other frustrating thing.

They’re desperate for answers. The reality of the situation is that there isn’t a simple answer. The overwhelming evidence suggests a combination of factors: genetics, environmental, social and behavioral. But this is unsatisfying. I’ve worked with people on this for years and when you say “it’s probably a combination of factors” they are never happy with that. They want something to blame. This is the political capital. He is giving them that. Basically everyone has taken Tylenol within the past year. Most pregnant women will take Tylenol at some point for discomfort, pain, fever, etc.

Now they will not only have the answer to “what did this”, they will have him as a person to hold up as the savior who gave them the answer. I saw the same thing happen when I started around 2010. Even though it was years after it happened people still attached to Wakefield and were so grateful he gave them the explanation that it was the MMR vaccine. They’d “protect their other children” as a result by not vaccinating them. Didn’t matter if you pointed out Wakefields proven financial links to an alternative MMR vaccine, the retraction of the paper, him getting his medical license revoked, etc. That’s how desperate they are for answers. FWIW Wakefield is still super rich and got married to literal supermodels so that’s why he doubled down and probably a major factor in why rfk is doing the same

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Paracetamol, what you lot call acetaminophen, was first synthesized in 1877(or maybe much earlier in 1852). It wasnt widely used until the 1950s. Tylenol is a brand name that means fuck all to any conversation.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

.... Tylenol is Acetaminophen, unless some atypical specialized formula. Just like Advil is typically just Ibuprofen.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Til autism was once understood as being the same as schizophrenia.

Quite interesting how the concept of neurodivergence is almost doing the opposite with respect to individuals who overlap on multiple neurological labels. Except it celebrates the individual uniqueness of their mind, needs, strenghts and challenges rather then generalising to find the one pill to sell to all.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Eh, I wouldn't immediately believe that. OP is playing fast and loose with their facts in this post. The first diagnosis of autism wasn't until 1943, so how did they differentiate it from schizophrenia in 1911?

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Did a little digging and apparently the name was coined in 1910-1911 as a symptom of schizophrenia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_autism

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] elbiter@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's no time or resources in the world to debunk all the bullshit this people generate. Every day, all the time...

[–] Michal@programming.dev 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

"Firehose of falsehoods" is the term, i believe.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] prime_number_314159@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I only buy generic brand medications, so my kids are at risk of generic brand autism. Is this going to be a signifier of a low income upbringing when they reach adulthood?

Should I switch to name brand Tylenol for their future?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Cool, maybe next they can find a cure for MAGA

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›