Photography

33 readers

1 users here now

A place to politely discuss the tools, technique and culture of photography.

This is not a good place to simply share cool photos/videos or promote your own work and projects, but rather a place to discuss photography as an art and post things that would be of interest to other photographers.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

communick@viewfinder.pro

rglullis

What's more useful 16-35mm or 24-70mm (alien.top)

submitted 2 years ago by TheSound0fSilence@alien.top to c/photography@viewfinder.pro

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I won an eBay listing for a 24-70mm f2.8 GM. However, the seller's photos showed a 16mm-35mm f2.8 GM.

I didn't think I'd win as my highest bid was $1k.

Turns out, I won and he then clarified his mistake and wants to know if I'd like the unopen (New) 16-35mm f2.8 GM.

I probably need the entire range but what would be the #1 focal length you'd use for traveling?

Also, is $1k for that lens worth passing on or is it a good deal?

all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] KidElder@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

I view as a dishonest sale and pass on it.

24-70mm any day for more useful.

[–] LongWalksAtSunrise@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

My favorite lens are in this order: 35mm, 20mm, and 50mm. It depends on what you like to shoot. I like wide angles with shallow depth of field so I use fast prime lenses. If you travel then consider the weight. Finally, see which one has less distortion.