this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
67 points (100.0% liked)

Free and Open Source Software

20321 readers
231 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ranandtoldthat@beehaw.org 1 points 10 hours ago

Sounds like there's enough here to start a fork.

[–] irotsoma@piefed.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

More evidence that although I love the idea of the MIT license, it is not good when large corporate interests and their money get involved. It's too easy for the code to get scooped up and relicensed or just hidden away. Copyleft licensed projects are the only ones I'll work on anymore.

[–] erock@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 day ago

IP and copyright are both tools used to control individuals, not corporations. We are seeing the reality in realtime with LLMs disregarding them wholesale.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

My 20 year dislike of RoR is finally justified, regardless of me not seeing this coming.

[–] theangriestbird@beehaw.org 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean sure, it was a bit buggy, but holding a 20 year grudge on Risk of Rain seems excessive. Especially considering it came out only 12 years ago.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 18 hours ago

Also, Gearbox only got involved like last year

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 6 points 1 day ago

Same. I didn't use RoR before it was cool.

(Honestly I just didn't like the syntax of Ruby and there were tons of great alternatives already by the time I was looking)

[–] artiman@piefed.social 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 7 points 1 day ago

I believe not going with that hed will get you executed in an unfortunate press accident.

Like running a sports hed of "Niagara Loses."

[–] Novocirab@feddit.org 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In general, is it worth to make an account to read on this website?

[–] theangriestbird@beehaw.org 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

in general, yes. 404 is a reader-funded tech news site, staffed by a bunch of experienced, professional tech journalists. That said, I don't blame people for asking for an archive link.

[–] Novocirab@feddit.org 3 points 20 hours ago

That sounds good, thank you.

[–] Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

I am honestly happy that i jumped off the Ruby ship about ten years ago. Rails was both a blessing and a curse of a beautiful language.

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Let's hope that a mastodon rewrite is coming.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's already alternative implementations, with somewhat different featuresets:

Having said that, frankly, I doubt that the Ruby ecosystem will fall apart from this. There's too many non-volunteers whose wage depends on Ruby to keep going...

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 2 points 1 day ago

So far we only have a desire to be on mastodon or gotosocial (if we ever figure out how to run our own server).

We are aware that there is other microblogging software on fedi, but we are happy on mastodon for now, as the people we want to be around are explicitly on servers running mastodon.

We can hope mastodon will do a rewrite, but yes, even if not we sadly agree. Still they should very much consider it, if only as a matter of principal.

[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)