this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2025
103 points (97.2% liked)

politics

26006 readers
2397 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Trump administration is considering a significant financial aid package for farmers, according to multiple sources familiar with the discussions. The package could include more than $10 billion in relief.

The White House is focusing on soybean farmers, since they've been hard hit by the Chinese boycott on American soybeans. Discussions about the package are still in early stages, one of the sources said.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 73 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The actual solution to all the problems caused by right wingers seems to always be socialism.

[–] bigfondue@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Fascism is sort of like socialism for the bourgeoisie only

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Oddly enough very correct.

[–] Pondis@lemmy.world 33 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Maybe the farmers should just sell their soy beans to the US manufacturers of Soy products instead /s

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 13 points 4 days ago

That is the irony. They can push for Americans to eat more soy products, but people can't come close to consuming as much soy as the livestock we feed it to. And with beef prices continuing to skyrocket, people can't afford to eat beef either. We should have been cutting subsidies for corn and soy and using that money to invest in farmers growing actual food for actual people. But that's harder to profit from so big daddy corporate ag made sure the gravy train kept rolling.

[–] zwerg@feddit.org 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Shut up and eat your soya steak!

[–] nymnympseudonym@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm sure American farmers will appreciate getting half as much as the Argentinians

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 11 points 4 days ago

The implementation of this will be delayed long enough for most of them to have to sell their land to Big Ag, THEN they'll distribute the money based on who owns those soybean farms (now).

[–] Sausagecat@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How much of that would actually go to small farmers and not just get eaten by giant corporations? I'd be willing to bet basically all of it and the only reason Trump is doing this is because those mega farm corps are lining his pocket for it.

[–] relativestranger@feddit.nl 3 points 4 days ago

and they can use the grift to buy-out the rest.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

From the book Catch 22:

His specialty was alfalfa, and he made a good thing out of not growing any. The government paid him well for every bushel of alfalfa he did not grow. The more alfalfa he did not grow, the more money the government gave him, and he spent every penny he didn't earn on new land to increase the amount of alfalfa he did not produce. Major Major's father worked without rest at not growing alfalfa. On long winter evenings he remained indoors and did not mend harness, and he sprang out of bed at the crack of noon every day just to make certain that the chores would not be done. He invested in land wisely and soon was not growing more alfalfa than any other man in the county. Neighbours sought him out for advice on all subjects, for he had made much money and was therefore wise. “As ye sow, so shall ye reap,” he counselled one and all, and everyone said “Amen.

[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago

Fuck that, they voted for it. Let them eat soybeans.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Can't wait for one of my coworkers to speak positively of this move so I can ask them why they're praising SOCIALISM

I mean, I think the world would be a better place if capitalism died and socialism were recognized as being far superior, but I can say with 100% certainty that THEY do NOT.

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

there will be some magical reason why the handout is justified for them.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 1 points 2 days ago

It's always "well the lazy democrats will take it so it's perfectly fine for one of us to take it so they can't have it" or some variation.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It's a $10 billion rebate.

[–] relativestranger@feddit.nl 13 points 4 days ago

can't be having the red-state farmers turning on them because of (the expected by everyone with more than three brain cells) policy failures.

they're just looking to buy continuing 'support' and mid-term votes.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

More like another $10 billion welfare check for the wealthy.

[–] Fontasia@feddit.nl 5 points 4 days ago

Since when in this administration did a discussion being in the early stages stop an announcement?

[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Something, something… waste, fraud and abuse.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 1 points 4 days ago

Quick plant some soybeans, in order to grab some loot.