this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2025
290 points (98.0% liked)

News

32724 readers
2597 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Damn right they're a safety issue.

I was crossing one the other week. Boom. Gay. Just like that. Had to get a divorce and everything.

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Sorry for your loss. I become gay but my partner became trans, so it still worked out.

[–] MaxPow3r11@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago

What's a real "safety issue" is this nazi fucking regime.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Lol I'm sure this is about safety and not a guy trying to feed a bunch of haters red meat so they don't look at the death rates in texas hospitals

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I wish my town had a gay cross walk, so then there would be more gay people. Rainbows make people gay and gay people throw great parties and have nice communities. I need that shit in my town.

[–] IndridCold@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Be the gay you need. Once you get the gay it will spread and make more people get gay. Gay the fuck out of the place. Gay that mother fucking town up!

[–] Grandslamdalf@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

This is just embarrassing.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (8 children)

If rainbow sidewalks were actually unsafe, the engineers would know it already (because that's their fucking job) and wouldn't need a goddamned politician to tell them.

That's 100% proof by itself (as if we needed any more) that Abbott is a bigot and a liar.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Fascists are anti intellectual after all.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 0 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

They technically are unsafe. They screw with Seeing Eye Dogs. That being said, it's just as easy to hang Pride Flags at cross walks.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

https://www.rnib.org.uk/news/multi-coloured-road-crossings-pose-a-threat-to-people-with-sight-loss-warn-charities/

RNIB Scotland Director, James Adams, said: “Traditional black and white pedestrian crossings offer high contrast, which is essential for people with low vision to detect and cross roads safely. Designs and colours which are not consistent with traditional designs could cause confusion to people with sight loss, and to guide dogs which are trained to stop at crossings.

You'll also have to train dogs to recognize both approaches because the starting color will be different.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

They technically are unsafe. They screw with Seeing Eye Dogs.

I think this might be true. Do you know of any published studies on this?

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

I'll see if I can find a study, but advocates for the blind have talked about it.

[–] elevenbones@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Oh the colorblind seeing eye dogs? 🤔

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] wavebeam@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

I don’t want to dispute this, because it’s just provably true, but I have never been able to figure out why my dog’s favorite color was red. It was definitely 100% his favorite color, even when there were balls that looked identical in every other way except were green, which should have appeared like pretty much the same color to him. And it wasn’t just a single favorite ball. He preferred red for several different toys that came in packs of multiple identical units except for color.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›