this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

NBA - Main

14 readers
5 users here now

Game analysis, highlights and everything else that is happening in the NBA.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

After thr Man City ref controversy today, i wondered why the nba doesn't implement an "advantage" rule.

The NBA wanted to discourage fastbreak fouls with a take foul, but that still stops the fastbreak. Instead the refs should play advantage until the fastbreak is hindered by the foul and asses the take oul anyway after.

Also the goaltending rules can be a bit harsh for the defense, the backboard goaltending call should be erased, most of the time you don't know if it even has a chance to go in.

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] reigntall@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago
[–] lukaintomyeyes@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

They should do out of bounds plays like in Spain so it keeps the flow instead of stopping and handing the ball to the ref.

[–] TubbzMcGee@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Drones handling jump balls, refs fuck them up over half the time.

[–] abcdef-G@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Or just get rid of jump balls altogether. We got way less jump balls in Europe and it is so much better

[–] dotorb@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Asshats would bring their own drones and laser pointers

[–] loco_mixer@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

no backboard goaltending lol are you serious?

[–] 666uptheirons@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (5 children)

I want substitutions to be done on the fly like hockey, instead of during a stoppage in play. It would create mismatches and make the game even faster.

[–] dotorb@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Those stoppages are for selling ads

[–] Perfect-Ad9637@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

This has never occurred to me but I love it. Would be absolute chaos and so fun.

[–] EGarrett@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

How do they handle that though? Would that mean teams would have 6 guys on the court when one runs in and the other is running off? Or do they have to tag out like wrestling?

[–] FeminismIsTheBestIsm@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

In sports that allow this, the teammate on that court usually has to get outside before the substituting teammate can go in. So for a few milliseconds you would have 4 players on the court, but never 6.

[–] cagemyelephant_@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

That would be chaos

[–] TeTrodoToxin4@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Let’s also add the penalty box for techs and flagrants.

[–] fediverser@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

This post is an automated archive from a submission made on /r/nba, powered by Fediverser software running on alien.top. Responses to this submission will not be seen by the original author until they claim ownership of their alien.top account. Please consider reaching out to them let them know about this post and help them migrate to Lemmy.

Lemmy users: you are still very much encouraged to participate in the discussion. There are still many other subscribers on !nba@nba.space that can benefit from your contribution and join in the conversation.

Reddit users: you can also join the fediverse right away by getting by visiting https://portal.alien.top. If you are looking for a Reddit alternative made for and by an independent community, check out Fediverser.

[–] Large-Yak-243@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think your idea is great on the surface but a huge part of the last seconds of a game involves stopping play with fouls.

[–] EdwEd1@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

There are no fast breaks at the end of games anyways

[–] dotorb@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

IST should be quarters won instead of point differential. You dont need teams running up the score for no reason.

[–] EGarrett@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
  1. You can re-sign players that you acquired on draft night for any amount of money, but if it's above the max, it only counts as a max contract on your cap. If the player is traded, their salary reduces to the max. This means that a superstar player gets a bonus for staying with their original team, but loses the bonus if they get moved. You can't make them lose the bonus only if they request a trade, because then players would be encouraged to sandbag without formally requesting.
  2. Add an Ironman Award for the player who plays the most minutes in the regular season.
  3. Switch the other statistical awards, like the scoring title, to total points instead of points-per-game.
  4. Pay players per game that they actually play, prorated to 70 games so they can make above their original salary if they play more than that. Give them injury insurance that kicks in if they are unable to play more than 50 for legit medical reasons and compensates them to that amount.
  5. Make penalties for flopping, flagrant fouling, accrued technical fouls etc cumulative throughout the player's career. So dirty players can either stop or be out of the league completely within a few seasons.
  6. Let the Euroleague champions, the #1 NCAA Team, a group of streetball players who win a national tournament, or the WNBA champions (gender equality / entertainment) play against each other and have the top two play against the top two NBA teams left in the Semi-Finals In-Season Tournament Final. With the same cash award available to them ($500,000 per player) if they beat the NBA teams and win the Finals.
  7. Make the worst team in the NBA have lesser odds of getting the #1 pick then the second, third and fourth worst teams. That would be the end of tanking.
[–] rpdm@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

i really like all of those. the last one is great. never seen that from all the pundits trying to avoid tanking. seems so obvious once i read it. still helps bad teams, but at least gives them something to "try" for. nice list!

[–] EdwEd1@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It would still promote the 10th worst team to throw their remaining 10 games to improve draft odds which is the bulk of tanking's problems

[–] rpdm@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

i get that side, but seeing the bottom 3 teams scrambling to not be last is amusing to me. it's like not getting picked last in a pick-up game. breathing that sigh of relief being picked 2nd to last is nice. or so i've been told...

[–] RenaissanceHumanist@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think defense would be more interesting if you got the ball back after blocking a shot out of bounds.

To count, the offensive player must be in a shooting motion when blocked (so that passes can't just be swatted out of bounds to gain possesion).

[–] Op3rat0rr@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

This is a rule I’m actually a fan of. I don’t think it would actually happen because it would drastically change the game I think

[–] superlazerX@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

enforce the flop foul

[–] PaperMoon-@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You don't lose a challenge if you win it

[–] Meyr3356@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

That change already has been instituted.

[–] lukewarmblankets@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

A foul is a single shot for one point if missed and no shots if it's a make, and then the team that was fouled gets to inbound at the halfcourt.

[–] nice_kitchen@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Elam ending standard in all NBA games.

No live ball timeouts.

Remove the charging call.

No more fouling out. Players can get 6+ fouls and stay in the game.

Live inbounds like the Spanish league. You don't have to give the ball to the ref after out-of-bounds calls, just throw in immediately.

[–] caandjr@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

One timeout per half, 5 sec free throws

[–] jslee0034@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Tried watching nba with my girlfriend, we both agreed that there’s too many free throws. No more foul baiting bullshit. (Watched suns warriors where they shot like 76 free throws combined) it was hard for even me to watch but can’t imagine a casual fan watching it.