this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2025
312 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26793 readers
3398 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the second week of the U.S. government shutdown, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention notified some 1,300 employees they would be laid off — then rescinded hundreds of those notices within hours, a person familiar with the matter said.

The Trump administration is set to lay off entire offices and hundreds of CDC workers as part of mass job cuts during the federal shutdown, four sources told Reuters on Saturday.

A crowd-sourced list from CDC employees, reviewed by Reuters, suggested several units, including the entire Washington office, were targeted for termination. Two sources within the CDC and two at other health agencies confirmed the list’s validity.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 84 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

They are trying to strongarm Democrats to capitulate and leave millions of Americans without affordable (as of the prices already weren't high) insurance.

The problem is that they were firing people left and right when the government was open.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 57 points 2 months ago

The Trump administration is like a wife beater.

They’re going to beat ya when you make them mad, and if you try to walk on egg shells and keep them happy, they’re going to beat ya then too.

[–] Sibshops@lemmy.myserv.one 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think the Republicans want to shut down the government. The Republicans haven't added anything to the bill that the democrats asked for. It isn't like it's a suprise that they don't have any Democrat votes.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 22 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Republicans don't believe in government as a concept. They should not be allowed to be anywhere near power.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 4 points 2 months ago

The GOP only believe in cruelty, nothing else.

[–] moody@lemmings.world 2 points 2 months ago

Of course they do. They believe in Republican government. Any government that doesn't advance their goals, though...

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (3 children)

It’s not only Democrats, there’s a surprising number of Republicans who publicly disagreed with Trump’s cuts. Marjorie Taylor Greene is louder than I would have expected in taking the Democrats side on the issue.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 months ago

This has settled, in my mind at least, who is the more awful person between her and Boebert. Not saying either of them are great but they were running neck and neck for biggest piece of trash in Congress. Between this and the Boebert handjob, I think it's settled.

That being said, I feel like Boebert has been uncharacteristically quiet of late.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 months ago

I think she is just afraid of her voters, looks like Georgia is heavily affected by this.

For example interview with Senator Warnock:

https://youtu.be/W-eLrT_3ZUs

Greene also supposedly is for releasing Epstein file, but when there was a vote to add amendment to another bill she voted against it.

I think she is just acting in front of her base.

BTW regarding the funding bill she actually said she is in favor of the nuclear option, meaning remove the 60 vote requirement, pass the funding bill and then maybe make some adjustments benefiting her state.

Republicans don't want to do it, because:

  1. If tables turn they no longer will be able to sneak their things with a threat of shutdown
  2. At that point the effects will be 100% on them
[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 months ago

I feel dirty that I’m agreeing with things she’s saying. But hey, I’m not gonna argue for now.

[–] tea@lemmy.today 5 points 2 months ago

I think they are fucking up their blame game. They can say "radical leftists are shutting down the government for political purposes" on .gov websites all they want, but they are owning the shutdown if they continue to try to use it to do political stunts like mass firings as retaliation. They lose the blame game if they keep this up.

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think you meant strong-arm.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago