this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
122 points (98.4% liked)

News

36618 readers
2856 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Investor confidence in China’s troubled property sector has been rocked again this week by reports that one of the country’s largest private building conglomerates missed interest payments on two bonds.

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jackolantern@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Damn so many tankies on this thread

[–] tal@kbin.social 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I have to say that of all things in China for Marxist-Lenninists to be defending, the Chinese urban real estate sector of 2023 seems like a pretty odd choice.

[–] teft@startrek.website 10 points 2 years ago

Read up on the concept of "face" in asian cultures. China doesn't like it when they appear weak or stupid. In any arena.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] teft@startrek.website 13 points 2 years ago

Happens anytime you mention anything bad and china. The apologists and downvoters come out and play. Same thing used to happen on reddit.

[–] greyfrog@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

That's pretty rude. I'm all for critism where it is due but seems like in any article about China rather than discussing the article we use the article to prove our preconceived notion is truth.

Same as I don't automatically believe any article I read about UK/US/Europe.

[–] teft@startrek.website 21 points 2 years ago (10 children)

Building ghosts cities to hold 30 million people and then not filling them. Who would have thought that’s not a valid strategy for property management?

[–] TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] just_browsing@reddthat.com 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Some are, but not all. The point here is building entire towns or entire new city sectors in one fell swoop instead of planning them out and building them in stages so plans can be adjusted as needs inevitably change is a bad idea. It's things like this that have directly led to the current property market crisis.

Of course if buildings are already there it makes sense to use them, but they might have been able to put something better suited or more economically viable there if they had staggered the construction.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

"Oh no, it's the consequences of my misgovernment."

[–] jumperalex@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

They are right on the cusp of the 2nd step of fucking around ...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They have a tightly controlled economy. The government will do whatever it takes to keep a default from spinning out of control.

[–] jumperalex@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

yeah there are certain things they can't do, like magically create population they don't have. even the BEST predictions, based on China's own reporting (which is suspected to be very inflated) say they are in for a very harsh reality demographically speaking.

https://www.salon.com/2023/07/30/chinas-great-leap-backward-so-much-for-the-next-dominant-superpower/

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/china-population-drop_n_63c69f7be4b0cbfd55f616e2

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2023/08/03/china-will-become-less-populous-more-productive-and-more-pricey

So yes they might be able to handle this current situation, maybe, but they are in for a very rough time of it and they have very few options.

[–] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Shrinking population +people buying as many apartments as they could as it was viewed as the only "good" investment (their stock market is a complete joke, filled with scam companies with fake numbers run like ponzi scheme). The real estate market there is due for a wild correction. The housing market in America has been manipulated by greed but at least there arent as many empty apartment buildings. Here people are least rent out their real estate and become slumlords.....