this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
266 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

59635 readers
3688 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Judge: Amazon “cannot claim shock” that bathroom spycams were used as advertised | A West Virginia judge largely denied Amazon's motion to dismiss lawsuit::A West Virginia judge largely denied Amazon's motion to dismiss lawsuit.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phx@lemmy.ca 77 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Honestly, people have been ringing warning bells for a while regarding how Amazon facilitates illegal behavior, including:

  • Products like this whose purpose is obviously got illegal purposes and even described as such

  • Counterfeit/knockoff goods

  • Unsafe and/or not adhering to legal regulations in the country which they are being sold (sometimes often faking the certification logos)

As somebody who has dealt with the latter two, I hope this lawsuit puts on enough hurt and/or spawns similar suits so that Amazon cleans their shit up. It's enough advantage that they don't need to stock local stores without them being able to constantly thumb their nose at the regulations actual B&M stores need to adhere to

[–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 62 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes. I'm quite tired of hearing "it's not our fault that toys full of lead were sold on our storefront and stored, fulfilled, and shipped from our warehouse in boxes bearing our logo! When we said that we 'recommend' the product, we meant, like, algorithmically, not for realsies. We had nothing to do with these products! It's all XGZDoo, a company we kicked off the store. And now would you like to buy any products from XGZDee, our latest new seller?".

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 12 points 11 months ago

Pretending to be just a middle man does help these marketplaces, delivery and taxi apps. Wonder if they could be as profitable if they couldn't make these claims. It seems being in a legal gray zone is their business model and iirc Amazon's delivery is subcontracted to third parties on a paper too.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 25 points 11 months ago (1 children)

my favourite is negative ion "health" products, that actually do produce negative ions, because they are laced with radioactive thorium...

[–] Sanyanov@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Funnily enough, the amount of such ions is miniscule.

So is radiation, though.

[–] Pirasp@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Even relatively small amounts of radiation can be problematic when in prolonged direct skin contact. The worst are the ones, that just have thorium oxide powder sprinkled on them tho. Only slightly radioactive, sure, but when ingested that can quickly cause serious harm!

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 10 points 11 months ago

Yep, health/beauty products, jewellery, and childrens toys are a big concern. A lot of people think they're all the same and just buy the cheapest one

and then there's stuff used for food prep...

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

I used Amazon to get a chemical that was illegal in Canada, but not America, and was sold on Amazon.ca, but delivered from the States.

That was a glorious day.

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Reminds me of when I got an Instagram ad for an oil filter that was literally just a suppressor. Not even "ooh it's not really a suppressor it's just a solvent trap" nah it was a full length baffled suppressor.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

was it listed at a price similar to an oil filter?

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

It was like $70. And they definitely weren't serialized. It was an ad for some random Amazon seller. Then a month later I got the same ad, but for Temu instead.

I definitely didn't click on it though. I didn't feel like ending up on a list.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 17 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The plaintiff—a former Brazilian foreign exchange student then living in West Virginia—argued that Amazon had inspected the camera three times and its safety team had failed to prevent allegedly severe, foreseeable harms still affecting her today.

An amended complaint included a photo from Amazon's product listing that showed bathroom towels hanging on hooks that disguised the hidden camera.

To the contrary, Chambers wrote that "if proven," the plaintiff's physical harms are considered "severe" because "emotional trauma inflicted during a child’s 'tender years' has an 'indelible effect' from which 'they may never recover.'"

The plaintiff hopes a jury will decide that Amazon "had wanton, conscious, reckless, and outrageous indifference to the health, safety, and welfare of children."

She has also alleged that Amazon "conspired" with the spy cam seller to "market and distribute a defective product both knew was intended and used for illegal and criminal purposes."

Tech legal expert Eric Goldman wrote that a victory for the plaintiff could be considered "a dangerous ruling for the spy cam industry and for Amazon," because "the court’s analysis could indicate that all surreptitious hook cameras are categorically illegal to sell."


The original article contains 816 words, the summary contains 188 words. Saved 77%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 11 points 11 months ago