this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
69 points (82.9% liked)

PC Gaming

8505 readers
843 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ecksell@lemmy.one 76 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I hope I dont need to upgrade my Sound Blaster audio card!

[–] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Still rocking my SoundBlaster X-fi Titanium Fatal1ty edition. It’s not necessary, but I have it and it still works, so I may as well use it.

[–] HidingCat@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Wow, that's gotta be like, 15 years old by now? Creative stopped using the Fatal1ty branding around 2010, I think!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ares35@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

that would be awesome.

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The AWE32 was the best sound card ever change my mind.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] simple@lemm.ee 41 points 11 months ago (9 children)

I'm a bit baffled that some people still use HDDs considering how cheap SSDs have gotten. You can get a 2TB M.2 for around $100. If you've got the specs for new games, there's no excuse.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

I'm baffled that some people update their hardware before it stops working.

But then I just keep playing old games that run on my system, so I'm probably not the target demographic.

[–] FMT99@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

I mean I play pretty much exclusively old and 2D games. If you asked me to give up my SSD or my GPU, the GPU would be the first to go.

[–] zaph@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

I've seen too many people spend more money keeping a system alive than they would have spent upgrading to modern hardware and I refuse to be like them.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Well what do you mean by "stops working?" Like, literally the hardware no longer functions, or would you also consider hardware that just doesn't run the newest stuff as well as older stuff?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rasensprenger@feddit.de 16 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I can get a 10TB HDD for under 250€, and there are some technical advantages. For example, if you have an ssd lying around unpowered, it will lose data much quicker than magnetic storage

[–] the_q@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (3 children)

You run programs or operating systems off that 10 TB HDD?

[–] ThunderingJerboa@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I have a 6TB one and yes mostly for single player games since loading screens typically aren't that big of a deal. OS always goes on your best drive and you know you can have multiple drives in a singular pc since you are sort of implying you can only have 1 drive.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] paultimate14@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

The PS4 has an HDD, and only partway through its life upgraded from SATA2 to SATA3 even.

Personally, I've got my boot drive, plus a 2TB SATA3 SSD for games that benefit from it's plus a 12TB HDD for the vast majority of games that don't need it (or to temporarily store games- it's faster to move them between drives than re-doenload them). So if I was planning on playing this games hearing this from the devs would let me know I need to free up some SSD space.

[–] HidingCat@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

Some games do load quite fast on the HDD, I keep those there. Most games do go to the SSD first.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] paultimate14@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Games keep getting bigger and bigger. This game is expected to be about 100GB, and that's not uncommon for modern AAA games. The CoD games have been over 200GB for a while now. Previous FF games have been similar size. RDR2 was 120GB.

I would expect most people playing FF16 on PC to have a small SSD drive with their OS, key programs, and maybe a couple of games, then a HDD for bulk storage.

I'm not interested in the FF series, but if I was this message from the devs means "clear up some space on your SSD". Which can sometimes be an inconvenience.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago

It’s because the upgrade for this console generation was an SSD

[–] Centillionaire@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

It is an inconvenience. AAA games will alway try to push hardware, and SSDs just happen to be one of the things that can do that.

[–] ares35@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

i don't play 'new' games, i don't have the hardware for them. most my gear is older salvaged stuff that didn't cost me anything to get. between constant rent increases and the cost of groceries these days, i simply can't afford to upgrade unless i get lucky and salvage something useful.

[–] zhenbo_endle@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago

I’m a bit baffled that some people still use HDDs considering how cheap SSDs have gotten. You can get a 2TB M.2 for around $100. If you’ve got the specs for new games, there’s no excuse.

I don't know why you got some downvotes. Buying an SSD to store the latest games is much more cheaper than buying a GPU. If one already has a powerful GPU, I don't know why they consider an SSD "not affordable"

[–] Chobbes@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

If you’re just buying a terabyte or two of storage there’s absolutely no reason to buy spinning rust at this point. If you want many terabytes of storage 12tb+ hard drives are going to be a fair bit cheaper than SSDs currently. SSDs have been rapidly dropping in price and increasing in capacity, though, so hopefully it just gets more and more cost effective to have a bunch of storage with SSDs.

[–] x4740N@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

SSD's with more than a 500gb-1tb start to get way more expensive than hard drives

[–] ono@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

It's simple: My SSD can only fit so many 100-300 GB games, while I already have hard drives with plenty of free space.

(Also, running Linux means that an SSD doesn't help game performance much anyway, outside of initial loading time.)

You can get a 2TB M.2 for around $100.

More like $150-200 if you want a good one.

If you’ve got the specs for new games, there’s no excuse.

What a very privileged perspective. I don't have much money, but most new games are playable on my existing hardware if I tune the graphics settings. I would rather spend what money have on things like food and heat. (Or if the basics are covered, then maybe a newish game.)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

If you needed one terabyte, SSDs have been affordable for a while.

If you needed ten, nope. Not until recently.

If you need a hundred, to-day, still no.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago (5 children)

In 2023/4 you should not be running a hdd in your gaming machine anyway, SSDs are so affordable now

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] theKalash@feddit.ch 18 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I probably also need at least a dual core CPU.

[–] CJOtheReal@ani.social 3 points 11 months ago

Same with GPU...

[–] TwoCubed@feddit.de 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So what? I accidentally installed Baldur's Gate 3 on a hard disk and it was unplayable, because the assets took ages to load. Transferred everything over to an NVMe drive and it's butter smooth. Just don't put anything that requires interaction on a hard disk and get with the times and plop in an SSD. Best bang for your buck in terms of an upgrade with a massively noticable effect.

[–] Sarmyth@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 11 months ago

Too true. Upgrading to NVMe was the most noticeable speed boost I've experienced all at once in my history of building my own rigs. It's was like black magic. Wouldn't shut up about it to all my friends for a month.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 13 points 11 months ago

ITT: people bragging about the 32 GB they paid $700 for so Oblivion would load faster.

If you dropped five grand on a PC a decade ago, yeah, of course you've used SSDs exclusively. Each gigabyte only cost two bucks! Meanwhile, on hard disks: ten cents.

If you built a PC three years ago, SSDs were finally approaching that ten-cent figure... while HDDs were pushing two cents per gigabyte.

The gap is closing. The low end for SSDs is trivially affordable, now. Key word: now. There's no reason not to have your OS on SSD, now. And the capacity of spinning plates can only be pushed so far within a 3.5" module. There will be a point where there's no reason to buy new disks. But if I want another dozen terabytes for network storage, like hell I'm gonna pony up for neon-spangled M.2 drives. $200 versus $600... how badly do I need those milliseconds?

this is nothing new... fuck game journalism

[–] CJOtheReal@ani.social 7 points 11 months ago

Don't fucking dare me! My fucking magnetic tape drive does the job just fine!

[–] satans_crackpipe@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Are you telling me I should stop gaming using a raid10 set made from 8x500GB HDDs?

[–] Willy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I haven’t had an HDD since around 2004, maybe 2002. Sure I cant keep tons of big games installed, but decent internet makes that not really an issue.

[–] GarytheSnail@programming.dev 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What were you storing your stuff on?

The first reasonable sized consumer ssds I remember were the original ocz line. What was it like onyx or agility? And that wasnt until almost 2010 ish.

2002 seems suuuuper early.

[–] srecko@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] GarytheSnail@programming.dev 3 points 11 months ago

I haven’t had an FDD since around 1950, maybe 1970. Sure I cant keep tons of short songs installed, but decent radio makes that not really an issue.

[–] Chobbes@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That’s super early to have adopted SSDs solely, no?

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

Yeah it is, and Windows didn’t get TRIM support for SSDs until Windows 7 in 2009.

The MacBook Air didn’t even get SSDs until 2008, and I believe it was the first mass-produced consumer computer with an SSD. Linux also got support around that time.

I’m skeptical unless OP’s dad worked somewhere that had enterprise drives to discard… and allowed drives to disappear.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›