this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
774 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37705 readers
91 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RobotToaster@infosec.pub 91 points 1 year ago (1 children)

About damn time, they should never have disabled it in the first place.

[–] happyhippo@feddit.it 55 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Let's just appreciate the fact that basically no other browser has this.

With chrome/ium you can't even block ads.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] sunflower_scribe@beehaw.org 56 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Now, if only iOS would allow true Safari alternatives. 🥲

[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 59 points 1 year ago (5 children)

They'll soon be forced to allow sideloading, in the EU at least. Should open the doors for proper alternative browsers.

[–] TheEntity@kbin.social 55 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I loathe the very fact they made people call it "sideloading". It's just installing on your own terms, like it used to be the norm.

[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, it's a carry over from its early days in how it used to work. You needed to install things via USB debugger. Generally that's all sideloading ever meant, transferring information from one device to another using a generally "local" method (SD card, USB, etc). Now sideloading, on Android at least (as it retains its original meaning elsewhere), just means not from the official repository.

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago (11 children)

I just activated Windows 10 on a laptop I bought from ebay, and I was reminded that Microsoft too wants people to view its official store as the default way to obtain software.

One of my goals for this weekend is to set up a dual boot for Linux Mint, which I've never done before. I'm fully aware of its limitations, but I'm getting so tired of all this crap.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GenEcon@lemm.ee 48 points 1 year ago (13 children)

I use FF on android for a couple months now. Solid browser and sync to desktol and add blocker are nice.

BUT: their page reloading is far too aggressive. You can't buy anything online, since once 2FA is required and you need to open your bank app, confirm, and switch back, the page reloads and the 2FA didn't get through. Tickets and such are the only reason I have still chrome installed.

[–] dsmk@lemmy.zip 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Hmm, I'm not experiencing that. Could Android (well, the flavour used by your phone) be killing background apps too aggressively or something like that?

Edit: could also be a RAM thing. I have 12GB.

[–] middlemuddle@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

I'm not experiencing that issue either and I have half the amount of RAM that you do. I've noticed an unnecessary autorefresh only after closing out of the browser for a long time, never in the middle of switching between apps. But, that does sound like annoying behavior.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] radix@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

This annoyed me too. I use Firefox Nightly with accessibility.blockautorefresh set in about:config, and it helps.

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1204335

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

why it was restricted in the first place?

[–] sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because there were enough incompatibilities to make it a hassle. But when they were sorting out the Web Manifest v3, they designed it with desktop and mobile in mind, so new extensions won't have problems.

[–] bankimu@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It makes less sense since extensions actually ran on Android, e.g. via Nightly and creating your own list of exceptions. Also if you downgrade and install in an old Fennec version, extension will continue to function if you then update to the latest.

I think the move was an attempt to create a walled garden. But for whatever reason, they have now decided against it. Thank goodness.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ItsTom87@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe they couldn't guarantee that the mobile version could run well with all of them? That's what I've always assumed.

[–] twistedtxb@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

For those who don't know yet: Firefox Nightly for Android let you install any extension you desire.

You just need to create a custom collection on the web site and link your ID in nightly.

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

You can also just use the collections of other users

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] suny@beehaw.org 20 points 1 year ago

great, now waiting for them to finally fix the supremely janky tab behavior.

[–] MoodyRaincloud@feddit.nl 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Permission to shout hurrah in an annoyingly loud voice sir!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bankimu@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My goodness that's awesome. I never understood why they locked it down in the first place about a year ago. What changed?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gabriele97@lemmy.g97.top 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nice. What I need now is the ability to group tabs together

[–] berg@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have you tried sidebery? When I found tree layout for tabs to be a thing I haven't looked back.

[–] gabriele97@lemmy.g97.top 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thank you! I am going to install it right now on my desktop PC. I was referring to the android version btw 😂

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 9up999@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Installed firefox yesterday. Nothing really changed or improved. Uninstalled firefox.

[–] FaeDrifter@midwest.social 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's 3 clicks to install AdBlock on Firefox mobile and that alone instantly makes it superior to Chrome.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ublock origin is better I believe.

[–] FaeDrifter@midwest.social 8 points 1 year ago

Ublock origin is actually #1 on top of the list and the one I have installed, I was using "adblock" as a generic term.

As far as I can tell, chrome mobile does not support ublock origin like firefox mobile does.

[–] randint@lemm.ee 29 points 1 year ago (14 children)

What is the main reason you (presumably) use Chrome over Firefox? People here might be able to help you solve the problem.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 22 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Literally was just telling my partner how much better browsing is since switching to Firefox on android. The ability to install extensions period is a huge upgrade, but also there are several available that are fantastic and not features available on chrome. Not sure what you mean about needing extensions to match chrome features. In fact, none of the extensions I've installed are features present in chrome. Plus I can block ads and trackers, activate dark mode everywhere, and use YouTube for audio with my screen off. I am kicking myself for being lazy. On top of giving Google personal data for no reason, I've had a worse browsing experience for years.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ExLisper@linux.community 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's funny how some people are willing to use weird android mods that can't run half of the apps to protect their privacy while others can't even wait 0.01s longer for a page to load.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] nx2@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago
[–] LaggyKar@programming.dev 9 points 1 year ago

It's about damn time

[–] transistor@lemdro.id 8 points 1 year ago

This is great.

[–] iloverocks@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

For every one who want to test it out you can use iceraven browser a Firefox fork that supports way more extensions than stock Firefox mobile https://github.com/fork-maintainers/iceraven-browser

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago (10 children)

God I miss the old Firefox for Android :(

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›