this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2025
134 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

54368 readers
1620 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A beuatiful, little gigabit router. Runs great with OpenWrt and can do gigabit throughput with SQM.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] yaroto98@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Is there a 2.5 gigabit version?

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I don't think so, not by DFRobot at least. That said, I think 2.5G is only useful for >1G internet connections. On the LAN side, the switch is what matters for LAN throughput.

[–] yaroto98@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Yep, you're right. I'm watching my ISP upgrade their cable to docsis 4.0 which will allow for 2g down 1g up. Instead of the garbage 1g down 40mbps up I have now. That upload speed is chaffing.

But I'm looking for a new toy like this because my current router is only 1g.

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm watching my fiber provider going bankrupt a month before finally patching us online.

I have 3TB of data, I can't back that up with 40 Mbps and occasional 10 min outages!

[–] yaroto98@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It took me 3 weeks to backup my 2TB of data.

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

over which protocol and settings? idk if borg can use file parts of previous but cancelled/broken upload attempts

[–] motruck@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

Borg resumes where failed backups left off so if you keep running it until it completes it'll dedupe what is already there and eventually finish leaving you with just incremental backups.

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Lol dont complain to much. You could be like me were i only have 1 option and although they just now released fiber earlier this year, im not paying the price for it. I've been stuck on 200mbps down and 30mbps up for years now and I'm paying as much if not more than people a few towns over that get 1gb. Also my ISP has no plan that allows over that upload speed no matter what plan you pick.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I have 4mbps down, 3 up. But I only pay $10/mo.

$50/mo for 1gbps symmetrical :p

[–] chaospatterns@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Unless you're running VLANs, in which case the inter VLAN is normally handled by the router. I also expose my home lab services over BGP so all my traffic hits the router then comes back to my lab services.

[–] Creat@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 month ago

Or if you have separated your devices into subnets/VLANs. Which becomes more important as your get more hardware that you don't really trust.

[–] dukatos@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

NanoPI R5S.

[–] YerbaYerba@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've used this for several years as my home router. I find sqm limits the throughput 10% but I disable it for the ingress anyway. Super reliable so far.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're supposed to set SQM lower than the WAN throughput. I think you're right that by default it limits it by about 10%. There was some study over a decade ago on this that showed 20-25% limit is best for maximizing responsiveness under load. It's not possible to effectively schedule packets if there's no headroom.

[–] YerbaYerba@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

I did go back and test and I don't see the bandwidth limited around 750mbits. I upgraded openwrt since I originally setup QoS. Now I can get my full connection speed if I set the limit artificially high.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

I have a few Pi 4 + UE300 routers in operation that work just as well but this is a nice alternative if you have a CM4 lying around.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It there a reason you went for a CM4? When I priced it out it didn't make sense

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Got the module some years ago when there were massive shortages. I found a couple CM4s and bought them at the time.

What are you comparing it to?