this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2025
244 points (98.4% liked)

movies

2260 readers
888 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 143 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (6 children)

As an Indigenous Canadian, I think the whole Avatar series is sickening

An invading colonizing force of foreign people invading a native people ... but the natives are incapable of helping themselves so they need a white saviour to lead them in the fight against their oppressors

It's basically cultural appropriation masked as a space opera

The worst part of it is how wealthy European people are still able in the most imaginative ways possible are able to monetize the misery and memory of oppressed people. Not only did they destroy entire cultures, they spend a good part of their time making money off of that memory and history.

The only thing I enjoy about the films is the AI, CGI and special effects ... beyond that, the writing is just another continuation of white people fantasizing about what it would be like to be a heroic Indigenous person who wins over colonizers ... a fantasy that has never been allowed to exist in reality.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 79 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

As opposed to the other Avatar, which explicitly features Inuit and mesoamerican cultures resisting literal fascist, genocidal regimes. And deconstructs the “chosen one” trope while they’re at it. And (as of now) uses culturally appropriate VAs.

[–] argarath@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Which avatar? The only one I can think of is the last air bender but I don't know how they deconstruct the chosen one trope

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 33 points 2 weeks ago

I would say one of the key points is that Aang gets constant support from everyone around him. Like any individual, he’s nearly powerless without that support. Most other “chosen one” stories I’ve seen, the character is saving everyone else.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Sort of. Per TVTropes:

He deconstructs the Kid Hero. Each Avatar is supposed to learn of their identity at the age of sixteen, which is the age of maturity in the World of Avatar. However, when the leaders of the Air Nomads sensed that a war was brewing, they made the decision to reveal Aang as the Avatar four years early so he could finish mastering his airbending and start mastering the other three elements to nip the threat in the bud. This decision might have made things even worse for everybody involved at the time because it forced a huge responsibility onto Aang that the 12-year-old wasn't ready for, and alienated him from his pre-series friends who were themselves too young to know how to treat him post-revelation. After overhearing he was to be separated from Gyatso, his guardian and the only one left who treated Aang as the kid he was and as an actual person, he ran away, and then got trapped in a storm that forced the Avatar State to freeze Aang and Appa inside an iceberg for a hundred years in order to save both of their lives. He subsequently blamed himself for the genocide of his people and the subsequent century of war because he wasn't there, even after he's told he would've been too inexperienced to make a difference back then and that his running away then is probably the only reason there's hope for the surviving world now. His childish personality and cheerfulness is sometimes an act to try avoiding the burdens placed on him which proves to be a problem several times when he has to face a problem head on to solve it (like learning Earth-bending or spending almost the whole series avoiding the problem his morals might conflict with what he'll have to do to actually defeat the Big Bad).

They were going somewhere with the pacifism too, though ran out of time.


Korra straight up deconstructs it, which is more what I meant. She was born to fight, she basically never got to be a child/regular human, but being a 'Chosen One' doesn't fix anything. She's targeted and hated by the antagonists for being such a singular figure of authority, and beat up to a pulp over it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 34 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

My favorite movie about an Indigenous person taking on an invading and/or colonizing force is Prey. No white savior there.

Prey was fucking awesome

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 weeks ago

Good shit there for sure.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jhuskindle@lemmy.world 33 points 2 weeks ago

It's a white saviour rehash. Classic movie trope in the USA and yes it is incredibly insulting.

[–] Ilandar@lemmy.today 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I completely agree with you. Cameron always gets so triggered whenever he's faced with this criticism as well, like all rich white American liberals. He doesn't even try to hide these views because he's so incredibly clueless:

In an interview with The Guardian in 2010, Cameron said the Lakota Sioux Nation was a "hopeless" and "dead-end society".

The interview was prompted by Cameron's visit to the Xingu tribe, located in the Amazon, who were fighting against the development of the Belo Monte hydroelectric dam.

During his time there he witnessed cultural ceremonies.

"I felt like I was 130 years back in time, watching what the Lakota Sioux might have been saying at a point when they were being pushed and they were being killed and they were being asked to displace," he said.

He noted that 'this was the driving force' in creating Avatar.

"I couldn't help but think that if [the Lakota Sioux] had had a time-window and they could see the future… and they could see their kids committing suicide at the highest suicide rate in the nation... because they were hopeless and they were a dead-end society – which is what is happening now – they would have fought a lot harder." Source

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

If the natives are outgunned and technologically outclassed, how are they to prevail without help from "the inside"? Otherwise it's just a depressing plot about the natives getting overrun.

the natives are incapable of helping themselves

I'm having trouble thinking of a time when the natives were able to help themselves against colonizers. OTOH, guerilla warfare has worked pretty damned well in the last century.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm having trouble thinking of a time when the natives were able to help themselves against colonizers.

Well, there's Ethiopia, and uh... it's a pretty short list.

(I'd also give an honorable mention to Haiti, although the oppressed people in that case were imported African slaves, not natives. By the time of the Haitian Revolution, the indigenous Taíno had long since been pretty much wiped out.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DoPeopleLookHere@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Why is "it's realistic" the line your drawing on a space colonization movie?

Your entire premise of "the natives are out gunned" is dripping with white colonization. Why are they always out gunned? Why not show them capable and holding their own and are helped out by "insiders".

Its a fantasy story, and there's tons of ways to do it without relying on the racist "natives are primitives" narrative.

[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago

Why is “it’s realistic” the line your drawing on a space colonization movie?

There have to be some kind of rules or else there's no tension. It must be realistic within the rules of the story.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 8 points 1 week ago

There's a reason it's commonly known as "dances with smurfs"

He thinks he's worldbuilding. It's fucking Propaganda

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 47 points 2 weeks ago

To close open threads you'd first need a plot, James.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 46 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

no on cares about the plot of avatar, and we're still surprised people bother seeing it.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

People watch Avatar because of the bleeding edge CG. It's not a unique story. It never has been. It's Pocahontas. It's Dances with Wolves. It's Fern Gully. It's A Man Called Horse.

Theyre all similar stories. Foreign heroes saving the "savage" local population that can't defend themselves from the technology, while learning about them along the way.

The story isn't why people go to watch Avatar.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

tbf, when I actually watched movies I never cared about the plot before hand anyways. I'm there to experience it while it's playing, not learn about it beforehand, see trailers, hear what the movie is about then go watch it. it just ruins the movies

now since I can't get away from the world spoiling movies constantly, even in commericals about them.. and corporations just remaking stuff and having zero creativity, I completely stopped watching all movies/tv shows.

haven't seen a movie since like 2020 I'd say. no plans to even see another. nothing is interesting.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I agree with you about the standard Hollywood trailer giving away the plot but...

haven't seen a movie since like 2020 I'd say. no plans to even see another. nothing is interesting.

This is the same ignorance as saying "they don't make good music nowadays" because you exclusively listen to top 40 radio while commuting.

Tons of great and interesting movies have come out since 2020. You can absolutely choose not to watch any of them but change "nothing is interesting" to "I am not informed"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's the movie equivalent of a roller coaster ride, so people see it because it's fun

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 37 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

These movies have threads?

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The first doesn't really (and the thread they "re-opened" to connect the sequel is pretty bad), but the second one does leave a couple things open.

In general, the second one does improve a bit on the criticisms of the first movie. Not enough to make it great or special IMO, but at least it's a bit better.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Lol seriously! Found out today that someone I'm loosely related to's husband was a big fan boy of this "universe(?)", right after I made a captain planet joke about them. I didn't say anything, but I was just thinking "there's been two movies and some mediocre games¿" Just like tilting my head sideways, mouth agape and all.

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 30 points 2 weeks ago

These marketing campaigns are getting a bit extreme (and simultaneously really whiney)

movie trailer voice "See Avatar: Fire and Ash in theaters now, or else! "

" ...or else James Cameron is gonna be really sad, you guys, and he's gonna quit and just make a book, you guys. You guys!"

[–] neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 2 weeks ago

Don't threaten me with a good time.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

He says, as if he's not responsible for three out of four of the top grossing movies of all time...

The movies may be bland as all fuck, but the man knows how to put arses on cinema seats.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Not mine. The Avatar crap was too boring to even watch at home.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] aislopmukbang@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I realize I am a minority but I don't think they were bad movies, not anything groundbreaking special effects aside, but not bad

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 weeks ago

The water one had a dogshit story. How often did one of Jakes braindead children get themselves caught? 4? 5?

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 13 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Why does he have to keep making sequels to it? Like, I know Avatar was the highest grossing box office movie at the time it came out, but at the same time it's hardly spoken of. Nobody's quoting it. I haven't seen memes of it since around its release. What even happened to get it those ticket sales? It doesn't seem to actually be a popular film and yet... It is?

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Eh, I don't mind if they make a couple more. I can take or leave the story, but the environments are well-produced and happen to result in interesting papers on rendering them. It's cool to have some much work and effort put into a natural alien environment. I can't really remember another movie in the last decades that goes this far.

Thinking about it, I'd really prefer if they made fictional documentaries instead...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

First well made 3D movie(as in the one that required a special glass to see) i guess? I too can't figure out the popularity of it.

Edit: now i remember a bit more, it's basically that. it released at the time when 3d cinema is still a fresh, exciting new thing, and Avatar came out and did the 3d justice, so everyone is excited to experience this and every recommendation is basically "best experience it in 3d". I remember when it released in bluray, people basically said it lost the charm because it isn't in 3d. But i guess it's still a competently made movie because the second one made as much money as the first one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SmokeyDope@piefed.social 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The only reason the first one was any good was because they copied the homework of Unreal. All world building after the first has been shit and people only watched the first because of 3d which was a massive flex at the time.

Tap for spoilerontributed by Rúben Alvim (1) on 18.07.2004.

One of director James Cameron's pet projects after Titanic was an epic sci-fi extravaganza called Avatar, much hyped in Hollywood circles at the time and poised to redefine the notion of a truly alien world on the big screen.

The project fell apart some years ago, but the scriptment (a hybrid between a script and a treatment ) by James Cameron still exists. Interestingly, you can find quite a few similarities between it and Unreal:


Both feature a basic plot premise where, by virtue of circumstances mostly beyond his control, a reluctant hero becomes the saviour of the native race of an alien planet forced to mine their land for ore of utmost importance to an invading race coming from the skies. In both cases the saviour is seen by the natives as someone who also came from the skies and is thus initially met with some alarm or distrust only to be later hailed as a pseudo-messiah.


The native race is called "Na'vi" in Avatar and "Nali" in Unreal. The physical description of the Na'vi by Cameron can be visualised as basically a cross between the Nalis' tall, lean, slender bodies and the IceSkaarjs' blueish skin colour patterns, facial features, ponytail-like dreadlocks and caudal appendages.


The Nali in Unreal worship goddess Vandora. The home planet of the Na'vi in Avatar (which the Na'vi worship as a goddess entity) is named Pandora.


In Avatar, one of the most dazzling alien settings described is a huge set of sky mountains, "like floating islands among the clouds". One of the most memorable vistas in Unreal is Na Pali, thousands of miles up in the cloudy sky amidst a host of floating mountains. The main sky mountain range in Avatar is called "Hallelujah Mountains". The main Unreal level set in Na Pali is called "Na Pali Haven". Both include beautiful visual references to waterfalls streaming down the cliffs and dissolving into the clouds below.


The Earth ship in Avatar is called "ISV-Prometheus". One of the levels in Unreal takes place in the wreck of a Terran ship called "ISV-Kran". Even more striking, in the expansion pack Return to Na Pali, the crashed ship the player is asked to salvage is called "Prometheus".


One of the deadly examples of local fauna in Unreal is the Manta, essentially a flying manta-ray. In Avatar, one of the most lethal aerial creatures is the Bansheeray, basically a flying manta-ray. The expansion Return to Na Pali even features a Giant Manta, while in Avatar one of the most formidable predators is a giant Bansheeray, which Cameron dubbed "Great Leonopteryx".


In the two stories (especially Return to Na Pali, on Unreal's end), a plot point arises from the fact the precious ore behind the invasion of the planet ("tarydium" in Unreal, "unobtanium" in Avatar) causes problems in the scanners.


Unreal was in development for several years before its release in 1998. The Avatar scriptment was probably finished as early as 1996-97. Bearing all the above in mind the temptation to start wondering about further suspicious parallels may be quite strong, but in spite of these similarities both titles have few else in common and many aspects actually veer off in wildly different directions. Even so, the coinciding factors can make for an interesting minutia comparison.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] drsilverworm@midwest.social 12 points 1 week ago

I wish other shows would do this TBH. I was really getting into The OA and it seemed like the show had a lot more to say when it was canceled before the final sseason. I'd take a book to wrap up the story line.

[–] Bonus@piefed.social 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] dmention7@midwest.social 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, we had Forest Avatar and Ocean Avatar. Now we have Fire Avatar, which still leaves room for Earth Avatar and Wind Avatar before they have to go fight the space cats.

Each one will have the same story, but still get stretched to 4 hours.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 11 points 1 week ago

Hire George RR Martin to finish it.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 9 points 1 week ago

Don't threaten me with a good time

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

I like them. I think they're fun times, and anything I even kind of enjoy I'm really upset if it never gets resolved or ends in some way.

Like Jupiter's Legacy on Netflix. Sure it had questionable acting and effects, and maybe the story wasn't super well-written, but it had me invested and I was wanting to see what happened next.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Disney keeps trying with Star Wars, failure after failure...so, why not? Avatar is a much better IP, at this point.

[–] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago

An absolutely blasphemous statement, and yet I can find no lies here.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

If they do make it, then they get to feature the not airbenders for Avatar 4.

And then the Not Avatar will come to save the world in Avatar 5.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago

The first few days of the opening are already sold out at my nearest theatre, so I don't think he's going to have a problem.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Maybe it's just me and my eyes are just shit (probably) but I saw the trailer in a theater recently and I feel like the visual effects haven't really advanced since the first one. Maybe that's intentional to keep a familiar visual identity across the franchise, maybe it's just a case of familiarity breeding contempt, but the first was supposed to be kind of a technical marvel, however now it fails to leave any impression or stand out and do anything new or special, in terms of visuals.

[–] Ilandar@lemmy.today 15 points 2 weeks ago

I think that's more of a reflection of the non-linear technological leaps rather than effort/creativity on the part of the filmmakers. No modern CGI films really wow me in the same way the big features from the 2000s did.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Oh, perfect. Bye.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 7 points 2 weeks ago

James Cameron needs to hire actual good story writers. He made an incredible world filled with potential, but he cannot write a story to save his life. It's the most generic shit ever filled with plot holes, humans invading? Drop all that.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

Those films are weird in that I enjoy them while I'm sitting there, but the moment it finishes I couldn't name or describe a single one of the characters in it or any details of the plot.

It's because they messed up a fundamental principle of character design - we can tell real human faces apart because our brains are highly tuned to it, but with cartoons and CGI faces you need to really exaggerate differences to get them to stick in the mind. The Avatar team tried to go for some notion of realism instead, and tripped over their own feet with a lineup who are virtually indistinguishable from each other.

[–] schwim@piefed.zip 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If he doesn't make a movie people want to watch, what makes him think he can write a book people will want to read?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›